Jesus and the Paralytics. Memorializing Miracles in the Greco-Roman World of the Gospels

Anthony Giambrone

École biblique et archéologique française de Jérusalem, Israel , Israel


Abstract

This study explores the Greco-Roman memorialization of healings through material culture as a point of comparison for the Gospels’ miracle traditions.  Special attention is given to the ex-votos left at healing shrines and especially the Iamata inscriptions connected with the Asclepius cult.  This corpus of evidence brings into focus a series of dynamics that help illuminate the stories of Jesus’ two healings of a paralytic (John 5:1-15; Mark 2:1-10).  The comparisons help clarify both the common memorializing supports that informed and sustained the memory of Jesus transmitted in the Gospels, as well as the distinctive relationship of the Christian cult to certain specific places where memories of Jesus where preserved.

Keywords:

ex-votos, Asclepius, miracles, healing shrines, Iamata, paralytics, Bethesda, Peter’s house

Alison D., Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010).

Bauckham R., Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids: Eerdmands, 2006).

Bettini M., Looking at Ourselves Backwards: Modern Recourses to the Ancient World, History of Religions 41 (2002) 197–212.

Byrskog S., Story as History – History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History (WUNT 123; Tübingen; Mohr Siebeck, 2000).

Colazilli A., Reproducing Human Limbs: Prosthesis, Amulets, and Votives Objects in Ancient Egypt, Res Antiquitatis 2012 (3) 147-174.

Comella A., Il deposito votivo presso l’Ara della Regina (Materiali del Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Tarquinia 4: Rome, 1982).

Dillon M. P. J., The Didactic Nature of the Epidaurian Iamata, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 101 (1994) 239-260.

Dormeyer D., Wundergeschichten in der hellenistischen Medizin und Geschichtsschreibung: Eine religionsgeschichtliche Annäherung, Hermeneutik der frühchristlichen Wundererzählungen (WUNT 339; eds. B. Kollmann, R. Zimmermann; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014) 127-151.

Dunn J. D. G., Christianity in the Making: Volume I, Jesus Remembered (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003).

Duprez A., Jésus et les dieux guérissuers a propos de Jean, v (CRB 12; Paris: Gabalda, 1970).

E. Orlin, Augustan Reconstruction and Roman Memory, Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity (ed. K. Galinsky; Oxford: University Press, 2016) 115-144.

Edelstein E. J. and Edelstein L., Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1998).

Fant C., Reddish M., Lost Treasures of the Bible: Understanding the Bible through Archeological Artifacts in World Museums (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008).

Gatier P.-L., et al., Greek Inscriptions in the Jordan Museum, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 58 (2017) 343–344.

Gatier P.-L., Inscriptions du 1er siècle a Gérasa, Syria 79 (2002) 277–281.

Gibson S., The Pool of Bethesda in Jerusalem and Jewish Purification Practices of the Second Temple Period, Proche-Orient Chrétien 55 (2005) 270-293.

Graham E.-J., Mobility Impairment in the Sanctuaries of Early Roman Italy, Disability in Antiquity (ed. C. Laes; London: Routledge, 2017) 248-266.

Graham, “Sanctuaries of Early Roman Italy,” 248–66.

Kirk A., Memory and the Jesus Tradition (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2018).

Lang M., Cure and Cult in Ancient Corinth: A Guide to the Asclepieion (Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1977).

Le Donne A., The Historiographical Jesus: Memory, Typology, and the Son of David (Waco, Tex; Baylor University, 2009).

LiDonnici L. R., The Epidaurian Miracle Inscriptions: Text, Translation and Commentary (Texts and Translations Greco-Roman Religion Series 11; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995).

Lohse E., Jesu Worte über den Sabbat, Judentum, Urchristentum, Kirche (BZNW 26; ed. W. Eltester; Berlin: Töpelmann, 1960) 79–89.

MacMullen R., The Epigraphic Habit in the Roman Empire, American Journal of Philology 103 (1982) 233-246.

Magness J., Sweet Memory: Archeological Evidence of Jesus in Jerusalem, Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity (ed. K. Galinsky; Oxford: University Press, 2016), 324-343.

Meier J. P., A Marginal Jew, Volume 2: Mentor, Message, and Miracles (ABRL; New York: Doubleday, 1994)

Olmo Lete G. del, Les inscriptions puniques votives : suggestions d’inteprétation, Studies in Ugaritic linguistics: Selected Papers (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2017) 451-456.

Renberg G. H., Public and Private Places of Worship in the Cult of Asclepius at Rome, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 51/52 (2006/2007) 87-172.

Rodriguez R., Structuring Early Christian Memory (JSNTSup 407; London: T & T Clark, 2010).

Social Memory and Social Identity in the Study of Early Judaism and Early Christianity, (ed. S. Byrskog, R. Hakola, J. M. Jokiranta), (NTOA116; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2016).

Thompson R., Healing at the Pool of Bethesda: A Challenge to Asclepius? Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017) 66-68.

Download

Published
2020-05-17


Giambrone, A. (2020). Jesus and the Paralytics. Memorializing Miracles in the Greco-Roman World of the Gospels. The Biblical Annals, 10(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.9681

Anthony Giambrone  anthony.giambrone@opeast.org
École biblique et archéologique française de Jérusalem, Israel



License

  1. Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
    a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
    b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
    c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
    d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher.
  2. The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
  3. The Publisher may sublicense the work.
  4. Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).