Historyczny szkic dyskusji na temat Kebod Jahweh
Juliusz Stanisław Synowiec
Abstract
Quaestio: „Quid significat kebod Jahveh?” multorum commovet animos exegetarum, qui diversas et non raro contrarias eius solutiones proponunt. A. von Gall etenim existimat in libris Veteris Testamenti kebod Jahveh significare aliquid visibile (tempestatem , figuram luminosam Dei apparentis), dum J. Abrahams vocabulum istud nomen abstractum dicit (potentia Dei), B. Stein vero ascribit ei significationem Dei invisibilis Eiusque qualitatum . Multi opinantur, quod kebod Jahveh simul concreta (tempestas, luminosa Dei apparentis figura, species ignis in nube inter theophaniam visibilis) et abstracta (potentia Dei) gaudeat significatione (W. Caspari, J. Morgenstern, H. Kittel, G. von Rad, K. Neuhaus et St. Łach). Diversimode vocabulum nostrum in scriptis ante et post Exilium compositis explicatur. Alteri enim duce A . von Gall tenent ante Exilium kebod Jahveh tem pestatem significasse (W. Caspari, G. von Rad, E. Dąbrowski), alteri autem putant realitatem , quae ante templi Salomonis ruinam et post eius reaedificationem usque ad annum 485 hoc vocabulo designabatur, nihil aliud fuisse nisi radios solis orientis, qui — ut aiunt — inter solemnem ritum Novi Anni in sanctuarium Hierosolymitanum immittebantur (C. V. L. Charlier, K. Vollers, H. G. May, H. Riesenfeld et praesertim J. Morgenstern). Secundum quosdam (A. von Gall, W. Caspari, J. Morgenstern, H. Kittel, G. von Rad, K. Neuhaus) Ezechiel vocabulo kebod Jahveh designavit luminosam figuram Dei, quam in suis visionibus contemplabatur, secundum alios non solum figuram Dei, sed etiam tem pestatem eius apparitioni concomitantem et cherubim solium Jahveh portantes (J. Knabenbauer, J. Herrmann, E. Dąbrowski). Sunt quoque qui censeant, quod Ezechiel lectores suos expresse certiores faciat figuram a se contemplatam non fuisse kebod Jahveh (= Jahveh) sed im aginem Dei invisibilis (B. Stein). In scriptis sacerdotalibus Pentateuchi (P) alii vocant kebod Jahveh figuram luminosam Dei apparentis (A. von Gall), alii quandam speciem lucis forma carentem (H. K ittel, G. von Rad, J. Morgenstern), alii denique ipsum Jahveh, cuius praesentia inter theophanias specie lucis indicaretur (B. Stein). Cum autem differentes istae opiniones a contem poraneis scientificis suadeantur, definitiva solutio quaestionis kebod Jahveh nondum exsistere videtur.Keywords:
Ezekiel, Kebod Jahweh, exegetes' opinionsSynowiec, J. S. (2017). Historyczny szkic dyskusji na temat Kebod Jahweh. The Biblical Annals, 15(1), 33–45. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/ba/article/view/2652
Juliusz Stanisław Synowiec
biblical.annals@gmail.com
License
- Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher. - The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
- The Publisher may sublicense the work.
- Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).
