The Solar Month in 1 En. 72:8–32
Henryk Drawnel
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4425-315X
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the literary structure of 1 En. 72:8–32, particularly its formulaic clauses used to express the monthly movement of the sun in its gates. One can distinguish two types of such schematic clauses, each describing a different phenomenon related to the movement of the sun within a 364-day year. The first type relates to the rising and setting of the sun in its gates and its nightly return to the east. The other concerns the changing duration of day and night based on the early form of Babylonian schematic astronomy. The focus is on the first type of the schematic clauses. Additionally, an interpretation of 1 En. 72:33–34, in which the ancient redactor comments on the relationship between the motion of the sun and the duration of day and night as two topics with recourse to two sets of formulaic clauses (vv. 8–32), has been included. Finally, this paper reflects on how these two sets were combined into one unit.
Keywords:
astronomy of 1 Enoch 72, the 364-day year, literary structure of 1 En. 72:8–32, movement of the sun, Enūma Anu Enlil XIV Table CReferences
Albani, M., Astronomie und Schöpfungsglaube . Untersuchungen zum astronomischen Henochbuch (Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 68; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener 1994).
Albani, M. – Glessmer, U., “Un instrument de mesures astronomiques à Qumrân,” Revue Biblique 104 (1997) 88–115.
Al-Rawi, F.N.H. – George, A.R., “Enūma Anu Enlil XIV and Other Early Astronomical Tables,” Archiv für Orientforschung 38/39 (1991/1992) 52–73.
Ben-Dov, J. – Horowitz, W., “The 364-Day Year in Mesopotamia and Qumran,” Meghillot 1 (2003) 3–26 (Hebrew).
Ben-Dov, J., Head of All Years: Astronomy and Calendars at Qumran in their Ancient Context (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 78; Leiden: Brill 2008).
Cook, E.M., Dictionary of Qumran Aramaic (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 2015).
Dillmann, A., Das Buch Henoch (Leipzig: Vogel 1853).
Dillmann, A., Lexicon linguae aethiopicae cum indice latino (Leipzig: Weigel 1865; reprint New York: Ungar 1955).
Drawnel, H., “Moon Computation in the Aramaic Astronomical Book,” Revue de Qumrân 23/1 (2007) 3–41.
Drawnel, H., The Aramaic Astronomical Book (4Q208–4Q211) from Qumran: Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).
Drawnel, H., “Early Babylonian Astronomy and the Duration of the Nychthemeron in 1 En. 72:8–32,” Revue de Qumran 36/2 (2024) 231–247.
Drawnel, H., “The Literary Structure and Schematic Clauses in 1 En. 72:8–32,” Dead Sea Discoveries 32/1 (2025) 45–74, https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-bja10056.
Drawnel, H., “Time Intervals in 1 En. 72:8–32,” Biblical Annals 15/4 (2025) 671–88, https://doi.org/ 10.31743/ ba.17380.
Fincke, J.C. – Horowitz, W. – Ratzon, E., “BM 76829: A Small Astronomical Fragment with Important Implications for the Late Babylonian Astronomy and the Astronomical Book of Enoch,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 75/2 (2021) 349–368.
Hackl, J. – Oelsner, J., “The Descendants of the Sîn-lēqi-unnīnī during the Late Achaemenid and Early Hellenistic Periods – A Family of Priests, Scribes and Scholars and Their Archival and Learned Texts,” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 8/1–2 (2021) 39–71.
Horowitz, W., “The 360 and 364 Day Year in Ancient Mesopotamia,” Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 24/1 (1996) 35–44.
Horowitz, W., “The 364 Day Year in Mesopotamia, Again,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 2 (1998) 49–51.
Hunger, H. – Steele, J., The Babylonian Astronomical Compendium MUL.APIN (Scientific Writings from the Ancient and Medieval World; London – New York: Routledge 2019).
Koch, J., “AO 6478, MUL.APIN und das 364 Tage-Jahr,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 4 (1996) 97–99.
Koch, J., “Kannte man in Mesopotamien das 364 Tage-Jahr wirklich seit dem 7. Jahrhundert v. Chr.?,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 4 (1997) 109–112.
Koch, J., “Ein für allemal: Das antike Mesopotamien kannte kein 364 Tage-Jahr,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 4 (1998) 112–114.
Lambert, W.G., Babylonian Wisdom Literature (Oxford: Clarendon 1960).
Leslau, W., Comparative Dictionary of Ge‘ez (Classical Ethiopic): Ge‘ez-English / English-Ge‘ez with an Index of the Semitic Roots (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 2006).
Milik, J.T., The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4: With the Collaboration of Matthew Black (Oxford: Clarendon 1976).
Muraoka, T., A Grammar of Qumran Aramaic (Ancient Near Eastern Studies 38; Leuven: Peeters 2011).
Neugebauer, O., “Notes on Ethiopic Astronomy,” Orientalia 33 (1964) 49–71.
Neugebauer, O., “Appendix A. The ‘Astronomical’ Chapters of the Ethiopic Book of Enoch (72–82): With Additional Notes on the Aramaic Fragments by Matthew Black,” M. Black, The Book of Enoch or I Enoch: A New English Edition with Commentary and Textual Notes (Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigraphica 7; Leiden: Brill 1985) 386–419.
Ratzon, E., “The Gates Cosmology of the Astronomical Book of Enoch,” Dead Sea Discoveries 22/1 (2015) 93–111, https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-12341336.
Sachs, A.J. – Hunger, H., Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. I. Diaries from 652 B.C. to 262 B.C. ( Denkschriften der philosopisch-historische Klasse 195; Wien: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1988).
Schellenberg, A., “‘And God Separated the Light from the Darkness’ (Gen 1,4): On the Role of Borders in the Priestly Texts of the Pentateuch,” Borders: Terminologies, Ideologies, and Performances (ed. A. Weissenrieder) (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 1/366; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2016) 23–41.
Steele, J., “Babylonian Astronomy and Enoch: Some Comments from the Perspective of the History of Babylonian Astronomy,” The Aramaic Books of Enoch and Related Literature from Qumran: Proceedings of the International Online Conference Organized by the Center for the Study of Second Temple Judaism of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, in Cooperation with Enoch Seminar, 20–22 October 2020 (ed. H. Drawnel) (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 216; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2024) 108–137.
Tavardon, P., “Un complexe scientifique à Qumrân: Le disque de pierre, les clepsydres et les mišmarot,”
Hokhmat Sopher: Mélanges offerts au Professeur Émile Puech en l’honneur de son quatre-vingtième anniversaire (eds. J.-S. Rey – M. Staszak) (Études Bibliques NS 88; Leuven: Peeters 2021) 283–324.
VanderKam, J.C., Enoch and the Growth of an Apocalyptic Tradition (Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 16; Washington, DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America 1984).
VanderKam, J.C., “1 Enoch 72–82: The Book of the Luminaries,” 1 Enoch 2: A Critical Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch, Chapters 37–82 (eds. G.W.E. Nickelsburg – J.C. VanderKam) (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2012) 333–569.
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4425-315X
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher. - The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
- The Publisher may sublicense the work.
- Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).
