Can Animal Welfare Serve as a Climate Adaptation Tool? The EU Law Barriers to Integrated Regulation
Abstract
Climate change poses severe risks to livestock systems through increased thermal stress, disease pressure, and extreme weather events. Empirical evidence demonstrates that measures improving animal welfare, such as enhanced ventilation, appropriate stocking densities, and environmental monitoring, simultaneously strengthen climate resilience. This article examines why EU legal frameworks do not systematically recognize this welfare-climate nexus. It demonstrates that the separation between animal welfare law and environmental law is not merely accidental but reflects the asymmetrical design of horizontal integration clauses in EU primary law. Animal welfare regulation developed as an ethically oriented regime aimed at protecting individual animals, establishing minimum husbandry standards without reference to environmental resilience. Environmental law, by contrast, evolved to protect ecosystems and natural resources through a holistic, system-oriented approach. Climate adaptation frameworks, situated within environmental law and grounded in Article 11 TFEU, do not systematically incorporate individual animal welfare, which remains governed by the more limited integration clause in Article 13 TFEU. The consequences extend beyond conceptual inconsistency. Regulatory practice does not systematically integrate welfare measures into climate adaptation planning,even where such integration would enhance both animal welfare and environmental resilience. This produces a coordination deficyt that is partly shaped by the asymmetrical structure of EU primary law, rather than by policy choice or implementation deficits alone. The article argues that addressing climate risks in livestock systems requires moving beyond the current separation of regulatory frameworks. Without rethinking the relationship between animal welfare and environmental integration, climate adaptation frameworks will continue to overlook welfare-based measures that function as effective tools of resilience.
Keywords:
animal welfare, climate adaptation, intensive livestock production, IED, EIAAI use statement:
I declare that I have used the AI tool ChatGPT (OpenAI) solely as a supportive instrument for language editing, structural organization, and stylistic refinement of the academic text. I also used AI to assist with citation formatting, all of which wereReferences
Adams, Nina, Ariane Sans, Karen-Emilie Trier Kreutzfeldt, Maria Alejandra Arias Escobar, Frank Willem Oudshoorn, Nathalie Bolduc, Pierre-Marie Aubert, and Laurence Graham Smith. “Assessing the Impacts of EU Agricultural Policies on the Sustainability of the Livestock Sector: A Review of the Recent Literature.” Agriculture and Human Values 42, no. 1 (2025): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10595-y.
Campbell, Ian J. “Animal Welfare and Environmental Ethics: It’s Complicated.” Ethics & the Environment 23, no. 1 (2018): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.23.1.04.
De Prekel, Lotte, Dominiek Maes, Alice van den Broeke, Bart Ampe, and Marijke Aluwe. “Evaluation of a Heating Protocol and Stocking Density Impact on Heatstressed Fattening Pigs.” Animal 18, no. 6 (2024): 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101172.
Farm Animal Welfare Committee. “Sustainable Agriculture and Farm Animal Welfare.” London, 2016. Accessed February 12, 2026. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f9365ed-915d74e33f747f/Advice_about_sustainable_agriculture_and_farm_animal_welfare_-_final_2016.pdf.
Guyomard, Herve, Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, Vincent Chatellier, Luc Delaby, Cecile Detang-Dessendre, Jean Louis Peyraud, and Vincent Requillart. “Review: Why and How to Regulate Animal Production and Consumption: The Case of the European Union.” Animal 15 (2021): 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100283.
Jordan, Andrew, and Lenschow, Andrea. “Environmental Policy Integration: A State of the Art Review.” Environmental Policy and Governance 20, no. 3 (2010): 147–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539.
Karageorgou, Vasiliki. “The Environmental Integration Principle in EU Law: Normative Content and Functions also in Light of New Developments, such as the European Green Deal.” European Papers 8, no. 1 (2023): 159–89. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/645.
Lafferty, William M., and Eivind Hovden. “Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework.” Environmental Politics 12, no. 3 (2003): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308254.
Martinez, Jose, and Cara von Nolting. “Review: ‘Animal Welfare’ – A European Concept.” Animal 17 (2023): 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100839.
Morgado, Joana N., Fabio G. Santeramo, Emilia Lamonaca, Maria G. Ciliberti, and Mariangela Caroprese.“Meta‐Analysis and Systematic Literature Review of Climate Change Effects on Livestock Welfare.” EFSA Journal 20, no. suppl. 1 (2022): e200413. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200413.
Munoz-Ulecia, Enrique, Alberto Bernues, Isabel Casasus, Ana M. Olaizola, Sandra Lobon, and Daniel Martin-Collado. “Drivers of Change in Mountain Agriculture: A Thirty-Year Analysis of Trajectories of Evolution of Cattle Farming Systems in the Spanish Pyrenees.” Agricultural Systems 186 (2020): 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102983.
Nowag, Julian. “The Environmental Integration Obligation of Article 11 TFEU.” In Environmental Integration in Competition and Free-Movement Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753803.003.0002.
Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia. “The Horizontal Clauses of Arts 8–13 TFEU Through the Lens of the Court of Justice.” European Papers 7, no. 3 (2022): 1357–80. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/618.
Roman, Antonio Albaladejo. “EU Feed Autonomy: Closing the Gaps in European Food Security.” European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, European Parliament. February 7, 2023. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2023)739328.
Ryland, Diane. “Taking Stock of Art. 13 TFEU in EU Agriculture: Reading Art. 13 as a Whole.” European Papers 8, no. 1 (2023): 191–219. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/646.
Schauberger, Gunther, Christian Mikovits, Werner Zollitsch, Stefan J. Hortenhuber, Johannes Baumgartner, Knut Niebuhr, Martin Piringer et al. “Global Warming Impact on Confined Livestock
in Buildings: Efficacy of Adaptation Measures to Reduce Heat Stress for Growing-Fattening Pigs.” Climatic Change 156, no. 4 (2019): 567–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02525-3.
Schauberger, Gunther, Isabel Hennig-Pauka, Werner Zollitsch, Stefan J. Hortenhuber, Johannes Baumgartner, Knut Niebuhr, Martin Piringer et al. “Efficacy of Adaptation Measures to Alleviate Heat Stress in Confined Livestock Buildings in Temperate Climate Zones.” Biosystems Engineering 200 (2020): 157–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.09.010.
Scherllin-Pirscher, Barbara, Christian Mikovits, Kathrin Baumann-Stanzer, Martin Piringer, and Gunther Schauberger. “Are Adaptation Measures Used to Alleviate Heat Stress Appropriate to Reduce Ammonia Emissions?.” Atmosphere 13, no. 11 (2022): 1786. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111786.
Skuce, Philip J., Eric R. Morgan, Jan van Dijk, and Malcolm Mitchell. “Animal Health Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Beating the Heat and Parasites in a Warming Europe.” Animal 7, no. s2 (2013): 333–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175173111300075x.
Slavik, Jan. “IED 2.0 – Chovy drůbeže a prasat.” Presentation at the XXV Meeting of the BAT Information Exchange Forum, Prague, November 28, 2024. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://mpo.gov.cz/assets/cz/prumysl/ippc-integrovana-prevence-a-omezovani-znecisteni/aktuality/2024/12/2_IED-2-0-a-chov-hospodarskych-zvirat.pdf
Sowery, Katy. “Sentient Beings and Tradable Products: The Curious Constitutional Status of Animals Under Union Law.” Common Market Law Review 55, no. 1 (2018): 55–99. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2018003.
Terluin, Ida, and David Verhoog. Distribution of CAP Pillar 1 Payments to Farmers in the EU. Wageningen Economic Research Report no. 2018–039b. Wageningen: Wageningen Economic Research, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18174/444994.
Thornton, Philip, Gerald Nelson, Dianne Mayberry, and Mario Herrero. “Impacts of Heat Stress on Global Cattle Production During the 21st Century: A Modelling Study.” The Lancet Planetary Health 6, no. 3 (2022): e192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00002-x.
Vapnek, Jessica, and Kai Purnhagen. “Animal Welfare in EU Law: Scope and Purpose of Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.” European Law Review 49, no. 2 (2024): 188–99.
Verniers, Elien. “Bringing Animal Welfare under the Umbrella of Sustainable Development: A Legal Analysis.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 30, no. 3 (2021): 349–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12414.
Vomačka, Vojtěch. “Animal Welfare Before the Court of Justice of the European Union.” ERA Forum 20, no. 4 (2019): 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00588-4.
Vomačka, Vojtěch. “The EU Charter as a Catalyst for Environmental Action: Spotlighting Articles 37 and 47.” In Human Rights and Environmental Protection from a Central and Eastern European Perspective, edited by Aniko Raisz and Enikő Krajnyak, 277–308. Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing, 2026.
Wawrzyniak, Daniel. “Review: Animal Husbandry and Sustainable Agriculture: Is Animal Welfare (Only) an Issue of Sustainability of Agricultural Production or a Separate Issue on Its Own?.” Animal 17 (2023): 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100880.
Zarba, Carla, Biagio Pecorino, and Gioacchino Pappalardo. “Animal Welfare in the Common Agricultural Policy Evolution.” Rivista di Economia Agraria 78, no. 2 (2023): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14423.
Zdrahalova, Lucie. “Legal Pathways for Climate Adaptation in Intensive Livestock Farming.” Paper presented at the European Environmental Law Forum, Ghent, 2025.
Masaryk University in Brno https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4629-345X
