The New Law on Civil Confiscation in the Republic of North Macedonia
Nina Madjovska Naumovska
University Goce Delchev-Stip , North Macedoniahttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-5185-8859
Abstract
Confiscation, as a criminal law measure, plays a significant role within the legal framework of the Republic of North Macedonia, although it does not represent a novelty in the national legislation. The 2004 legal reforms formally introduced confiscation as a mechanism aimed not at punishment but at restoring legal equity by depriving individuals of assets unlawfully acquired through criminal activity. The legal framework distinguishes between in rem confiscation regulated under civil law and in personam confiscation applied within the scope of criminal law. The adoption of the Law on Confiscation of Property in Civil Proceedings introduced the possibility of confiscating property without a final criminal conviction, thereby broadening the state’s capacity to target assets reasonably suspected of illicit origin. This development raises important questions as to procedural safeguards and legal certainty, particularly in relation to the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. The paper examines the normative and procedural aspects of both forms of confiscation, their implementation in practice, and the underlying reasons for their limited application in judicial proceedings.
Keywords:
confiscation, civil procedure, criminal procedure, legal uncertainty, procedural safeguardsReferences
Anagnostopoulos, Ilias and Alexandros Tsagkalidis. “Confiscation of Unexplained Wealth: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?.” Chambers and Partners, July 2024. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://chambers.com/legal-trends/eu-asset-recovery-directive-unexplained-wealth-confiscation.
Ashtalkoska-Baloska, Tatiana. “Extended Confiscation in Criminal Law – Comparative Aspects and Problems in Its Application.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 26, no. 1–2 (2019): 1–14. http://www.maclc.mk/Upload/Documents/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Astalkovska%20Tatjana_%D0%9B%D0%95%D0%9A.doc.pdf.
Avramovski, Darko, and Natali Petrovska. “Confiscation of Property in Corruption-Related Court Proceedings.” Coalition “All for Fair Trials,” Skopje, November 2019. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://all4fairtrials.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/38-PBPK-2019.pdf.
Van Ballegooij, Wouter. “Protecting the EU’s Financial Interests through Criminal Law: The Implementation of the ‘PIF Directive’.” eucrim, no. 3 (2021): 177–81. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2021-022.
Boucht, Johan. “Non-Conviction Based Confiscation and the Second Aspect of the Presumption of Innocence under Article 6(2) ECHR.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 16, no. 4 (2025): 426–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251384137.
European Commission. North Macedonia 2024 Report. Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2024) 693 final. Brussels, October 30, 2024. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/north-macedonia-report-2024.
Gruevska Drakulevski, Aleksandra, and Aleksandra Deanoska Trendafilova. “Confiscation of Property and Pecuniary Benefit in Criminal Proceedings versus Confiscation of Property in Civil Proceedings in Macedonian Law.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 31, no. 1–2 (2024): 1–19. http://www.maclc.mk/Upload/Documents/Gruevska,%20Deanoska(3).pdf.
Kalajdziev, Gordan. “Black Days for the Constitutional Order: Analysis of the Proposed Amendments to the Law on Restrictions.” Macedonian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 31, no. 1–2 (2024): 1–12.
Simőes, Rita. “Non-Conviction Based Confiscation.” Quick Guide 42, Basel Institute of Governance, 2025. Accessed February 26, 2026. https://baselgovernance.org/sites/default/files/2025-10/251016%20QG42-Non-conviction%20based%20confiscation.pdf.
Simonato, Michele. “Confiscation and Fundamental Rights across Criminal and Non-Criminal Domains.” ERA Forum 18, no. 3 (2017): 365–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0485-0.
State Attorney’s Office of the Republic of North Macedonia. Annual Work Report for 2024. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://dprsm.gov.mk/wp/2023/12/.
State Statistical Office of the Republic of North Macedonia. MAKSTAT Database. “Judiciary/Accused and Convicted Perpetrators of Criminal Offences/Convicted Adult Persons by Groups of Criminal Offences and Total Imposed Security Measures, Imposed Confiscation of Property and Seized Objects, by Years.” Accessed February 17, 2026. https://makstat.stat.gov.mk/PXWeb/pxweb/mk/MakStat/MakStat__Sudstvo__ObvinetiOsudeniStoriteli/326_SK2_Mk_T16_ml.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=46ee0f64-2992-4b45-a2d9-cb4e5f7ec5ef.
Trinchera, Tommaso. “Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation under Italian Law: Legal Nature and Constitutional Rules.” Política Criminal 20, no. 39 (2025): 306–33. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992025000100306.
Wahl, Thomas. “New Directive on Asset Recovery and Confiscation.” eucrim, no. 1 (2024). https://eucrim.eu/news/new-directive-on-asset-recovery-and-confiscation/.
University Goce Delchev-Stip https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5185-8859
