The Emergence of Sustainable Animal Protection in European Law – Conceptual Foundations, Doctrinal Limits, and Comparative Governance Patterns
Anita Paulovics
University of Miskolc , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-1425-0842
Szilvia Vetter
University of Veterinary Medicine in Budapest , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9992-0808
Dóra Koska Hedvig
University of Veterinary Medicine in Budapest , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-4214-8496
Abstract
This article examines Sustainable Animal Protection (SAP) as an emerging analytical and governance framework in European law: a shift from sectoral welfare standards and conversation-oriented fauna protection toward an integrated legal architecture that linkt Treaty-based sustainability commitments to animal-welfare requirements and operationalizes tchem through blended instruments. It argues that EU law is progressively linking animal welfare with environmental integration, official controls, traceability requirements, and institutional capacity, while maintaining important doctrinal distinctions between the protection of animals as sentient individual beings and conservation regimes concerned with species, habitats, and biodiversity. Methodologically, the article combines doctrinal analysis of EU primary and secondary law with a focused comparative governance typology and a Hungarian case study. The comparative dimension identifies several regulatory patterns among Member States, including market-based approaches, civil-society certification schemes, statutory labeling models, mixed forms of informational governance, and coordinated public-funding frameworks. The article concludes that sustainable animal protection should be understood primarily as a governance-design challenge. Its durability depends not only on the articulation of substantive welfare standards, but also on enforceable control mechanisms, stable financing structures, periodic review, and transparent coordination among public authorities, expert institutions, and civil-society actors.
Keywords:
sustainable animal protection, EU law, animal welfare, governance, animal welfare lawReferences
Bergmann, Iris M. “Interspecies Sustainability to Ensure Animal Protection: Lessons from the Thoroughbred Racing Industry.” Sustainability 11, no. 19 (2019): 5539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195539.
Beter Leven Keurmerk Zakelijk. “Glossary BLLF.” Accessed November 14, 2025. https://beterleven.dierenbescherming.nl/zakelijk/en/what-is-the-better-life-label/glossary-bllf/.
BGA Zrt. “Megjelent az Igazságügyi Minisztérium által biztosított forrásból a 2026. évi ‘Az állatvédő szervezetek támogatása’ című pályázati kiírás” [“The 2026 Call for Proposals ‘Support for Animal Protection Organizations,’ Financed from Resources Provided by the Ministry of Justice, Has Been Published”]. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://bgazrt.hu/megjelent-az-igazsagugyi-miniszterium-altal-biztositott-forrasbol-a-2026-eviaz-allatvedo-szervezetek-tamogatasa-cimu-palyazati-kiiras/.
Contalbrigo, Laura, Simona Normando, Emma Bassan, and Franco Mutinelli. “The Welfare of Dogs and Cats in the European Union: A Gap Analysis of the Current Legal Framework.” Animals 14, no. 17 (2024): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172571.
Danish Veterinary, Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Agency. “The Governmental Animal Welfare Label.” Accessed February 25, 2026. https://en.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/animals/animal-welfare/the-governmental-animal-welfare-label.
Étiquette Bien-Etre Animal. “Étiquetage Informatif Sur Le Bien-Etre Animal.” Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.etiquettebienetreanimal.fr.
FAO, UNEP, WHO, and WOAH. One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022–2026). Working Together for the Health of Humans, Animals, Plants and the Environment. Rome, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2289en.
Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity. “The State Animal Husbandry Label.” Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.tierhaltungskennzeichnung.de/en/information-for-consumers/.
Government of Hungary. “Megalakult a Nemzeti Állatvédelmi Tanács” [“The National Animal Protection Council Was Established”]. Kormany.hu, April 13, 2021. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://kormany.hu/hirek/megalakult-a-nemzeti-allatvedelmi-tanacs.
György, Fekete Sándor. “Az állatkísérletek 3R-je a XXI. századi tudományos eredmények tükrében.” Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja 143, no. 8 (2021): 465–78.
Koska Hedvig, Dóra. “Állami támogatások hatása az állatvédelmi intézményrendszerekre.” Acta Animalia Hungarica 1, no. 1 (2025): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.65063/AAH.2025.1.90.
Marko, Dimitrijević. “Theoretical Aspects of Biodiversity Protection in European Monetary Legislation.” Review of European and Comparative Law 63, no. 4 (2025): 105–26. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.18757.
Mełgieś, Katarzyna K. “The Evolution of One Health Concept – A European Perspective.” Review of European and Comparative Law 57, no. 2 (2024): 7–29. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.17467.
Morelli, John. “Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals.” Journal of Environmental Sustainability 1, no. 1 (2011): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002.
Offor, Iyan. “Animal Welfare, Bilateral Trade Agreements, and Sustainable Development Goal Two.”The UK Journal of Animal Law 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–6. https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/12069/1/ALAW%20Publication%20A%207%20Jun%202019.pdf .
Paulovics, Anita, and Szilvia Vetter. “Sustainable Animal Welfare: A 21st Century Imperative and Transnational Legal Considerations, with Emphasis on Hungary.” European Integration Studies 21, no. 1 (2025): 389–405. https://doi.org/10.46941/2025.se1.19.
Śpelić, Ivana, and Alka Mihelić-Bogdanić. “EU Environmental Protection in Regard to Sustainable Development: Myth or Reality?.” Standards 4, no. 4 (2024): 176–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/standards4040010 .
Tarazona, Ariel, M., Maria C. Ceballos, and Donald M. Broom. “Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology.” Animals 10, no. 1 (2019): 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010043.
Vetter, Szilvia. “Az állatkínzás büntetőjogi tényállásának szigorítása Magyarországon az elmúlt évtizedek kriminológiai és pszichológiai kutatásainak tükrében.” Ügyészek Lapja 30, no. 3 (2023): 17–28. https://ugyeszeklapja.hu/?p=4216.
Vetter, Szilvia. “The Regulation of Animal Cruelty in Relation to Economic And Social Indicators.” PhD diss., Szent István University, 2020. https://real-phd.mtak.hu/1714/3/vetter_szilvia_thesis.pdf.
Vinnari, Eija, and Markus Vinnari. “Making the Invisibles Visible: Including Animals in Sustainability (and) Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 82 (2022): 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102324.
University of Miskolc https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1425-0842
University of Veterinary Medicine in Budapest https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4214-8496
