Legal Certainty in Substantive Law as a Condition for Effective Civil Proceedings : The Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
Hanna Churpita
National Academy of Internal Affairs , Ukrainehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-347X
Nataliia Bilianska
State Tax University , Ukrainehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-5500
Iryna Borovska
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv , Ukrainehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-0391
Bohdan Kyrdan
National Academy of Internal Affairs , Ukrainehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-9930
Nelia Savchyn
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University , Ukrainehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-7373
Abstract
Historically, the effectiveness of civil proceedings has been analyzed mainly through procedural guarantees; the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, however, increasingly shows that the quality of substantive regulation also affects the practical effectiveness of judicial protection. Under conditions of normative instability and broad judicial discretion, legal certainty acquires systemic importance for the foreseeability of the law and for public trust in the justice system. Although the principle of legal certainty is well developed in the rule-of-law literature, its structural role as a precondition for effective civil adjudication remains insufficiently explored. This study seeks to demonstrate the fundamental significance of legal certainty in substantive law as a structural condition of civil proceedings, and to develop an account of the quality of substantive regulation as a precondition for the effective enjoyment of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Convention. It applies the dogmatic and comparative methods, together with a structured interpretative analysis of case-law, and examines 180 judicial decisions: 120 judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (2000–2024) and 60 judgments of the highest courts of Poland, France, and Germany, supplemented by civil codes and statutes. The analysis shows that foreseeability, consistency of judicial practice, protection of legitimate expectations, legal stability, and the finality of judicial decisions operate as interdependent indicators of the normative quality of substantive law within the civil limb of Article 6, and that vagueness or internal inconsistency in substantive norms may render formally correct proceedings ineffective as a means of protecting rights.
Keywords:
Article 6 of the Convention, Civil proceedings, European Court of Human Rights, legal certainty, rule of lawsubstantive lawReferences
Andrusiv, Ulyana B. “Essence of the Principle of Legality in the Case-Law of the ECHR.” Visegrad Journal on Human Rights 5, no. 2 (2019): 1–15.
Balashov, Anatolii N., Andrii M. Lyseiuk, Ivan I. Bashta, Anastasiia D. Shtelmashenko, and Andrii V. Mykoliuk. “Risks of Social Communications of Public Administrative Bodies with Regard to Manifestations of Corruption.” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 9, no. 6 (2020): 239–51. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0128.
Buchan, Russel, Daniel Franchini, and Nicholas Tsagourias, eds. The Changing Character of International Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Cameron, Iain. The European Court of Human Rights and Rule of Law Backsliding. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2023.
Cammack, Mark. “Legal Certainty in the Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Critique and Friendly Suggestion.” In Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia, edited by Melissa Crouch, 275–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870681.003.0014.
Cavaliere, Paolo. “The Truth in Fake News: How Disinformation Laws Are Reframing the Concepts of Truth and Accuracy on Digital Platforms.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 3, no. 4 (2022): 481–523. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10044.
Cousins, Mel. “Legitimate Expectation and Social Security Law under the European Convention of Human Rights.” European Journal of Social Security 23, no. 1 (2021): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262720961792.
Dalla Corte, Lorenzo. “A Critical Comment on Proportionality in the Mass Surveillance Jurisprudence of the CJEU and the ECtHR.” In Data Retention in Europe and Beyond: Law and Policy in the Aftermath of an Invalidated Directive, edited by Eleni Kosta and Irene Kamara, 45–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191998980.003.0005.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Study on the Functioning of Judicial Systems in the EU Member States: 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
European Commission. EU Justice Scoreboard 2024. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
European Commission. EU Justice Scoreboard 2025. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2025.
Finnerty, Joseph. “Confronting Authoritarian Practices through Procedural-Based Review: The Case of the Polish Rule of Law Crisis.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 7, no. 1–2 (2026): 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10150.
Garcia Blesa, Juan J. “The Cultural Dimensions of Legal Certainty: A Study on the Use of Intercultural Knowledge in European Law-Application.” European Papers – A Journal on Law and Integration 10, no. 2 (2025): 405–34. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/838.
Hansen, Alexandra E. Facts before the European Court of Human Rights. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748933229.
Ivaniv, Andrii R. “Precedent Nature of the European Court of Human Rights Decisions and Their Place in the Domestic Legal System.” Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law 89, no. 1 (2025): 60–69. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.1.8.
Karnaukh, Bohdan P. “Limitation Period in Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights.” Problems of Legality, no. 134 (2016): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.134.71276.
Kostruba, Anatoliy V. “Law Enforcement as a Form of Realization of Right: Phenomenological Analysis Experience (Civilized Aspect).” Revista de Derecho Civil 5, no. 1 (2018): 177–90.
Kostruba, Anatoliy V. “Right Deprivation in the Legal Regulation Mechanism of Civil Property Relations: Comparative Analysis of International Legislation.” Asia Life Sciences Supp22 (2) (2020): 143–56.
Leloup, Mathieu. “Not Just a Simple Civil Servant: The Right of Access to a Court of Judges in the Recent Case Law of the ECtHR.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 4, no. 1 (2022): 23–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10055.
Lupo, Nicola, and Giovanni Piccirilli. “European Court of Human Rights and the Quality of Legislation: Shifting to a Substantial Concept of ‘Law’?.” Jurisprudence 6, no. 2 (2012): 229–42. https://doi.org/10.5235/175214612803596668.
Oliinyk, Olena S., Roman M. Shestopalov, Volodymyr O. Zarosylo, Mykhaylo I. Stankovic, and Sergii G. Golubitsky. “Economic Security through Criminal Policies: A Comparative Study of Western and European Approaches.” Revista Científica General José María Córdova 20, no. 38 (2022): 265–85. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.899.
Ostapenko, Hanna. “The Role of Legal Certainty Principle in Provision of Access to Justice in Ukraine in Wartime.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 6, no. 3 (2023): a000306. https://doi.org/10.33327/ AJEE-18-6.3-a000306.
Panov, Mykola I. “The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Quality Problems of the Criminal Legislation of Ukraine.” Problems of Legality 128 (2015): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.128.52082.
Parlement Francais. Code civil des Français. Version consolidée au 27 février 2026. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/.
Petechyl, Nadiia M. “Realization of the Principle of the Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.” Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law 5, no. 86 (2024): 331–35. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.86.5.48.
Pilkov, Kostiantyn. “Reopening Cases Following Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Room for a European Consensus?.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 16, no. 4 (2022): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000415.
Shcherbanyuk, Oksana, Vіtalii Gordieiev, and Laura Bzova. “Legal Nature of the Principle of Legal Certainty as a Component Element of the Rule of Law.” Tribuna Juridică 13, no. 1 (2023): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/1.02.
Sicilianos, Linos-Alexandre. The Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights: The Independence of the Judiciary. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2020.
van der Sloot, Bart. “The Strasbourg-Effect: Wieder and Guarnieri and the Extra-Territorial Effect of the European Convention on Human Rights.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 6, no. 3 (2025): 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10130.
Susi, Mart. “On Foreseeability and Non-Foreseeability.” In The Non-Coherence Theory of Digital Human Rights, 196–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009407717.020.
Tashian, Roman I., Yuliia S. Tavolzhanska, Oleksii V. Tavolzhanskyi, Serhii V. Grynchak, and Nataliia V. Smetanina. “Scientific Doctrine as a Source of Law in International Law and Legal Systems of the World.” Revista Jurídica Portucalense (Special Issue) (2023): 232–52. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne)2023.ic-12.
Truu, Mario. “The European Court of Human Rights and the Principle of Foreseeability (Lex Certa and Stricta): How to Determine Whether an Offence Is Clearly Defined in Criminal Law.” Juridica International 31 (2022): 98–110. https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.07.
Venice Commission. Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions and Reports. CDL-PI(2025)003. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2025.
Wibye, Johan V. “Incompatible or Impossible-Legal Conflict Resolution at the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 25, no. 4 (2025): ngaf034. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf034.
Wojtyczek, Krzysztof. “Precedent in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights.” In Constitutional Law and Precedent, edited by Monika Florczak-Wątor, 233–50. London: Routledge, 2022.
National Academy of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-9930
