“Et ait: «Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram»” (Gen 1:26). An attempt of Byzantine exegesis on the example of A commentary to the book of Genesis by Anastasius of Sinai

Magdalena Jóźwiak

Uniwersytet Wrocławski , Poland


Abstract

The Hexaëmeron, traditionally ascribed to Anastasius of Sinai may be one of the most important works of Christian mysticism from the Byzantine era. Three factors make it especially significant. First, it is one of the longest and most detailed surviving examples of Christian mystical exegesis as practiced in the Byzantine period. Second, this commentary is an extensive and unified exposition of the theology of an important Church writer. And finally, the Hexaëmeron is not only steeped in biblical literature, but also contains a large reservoir of quotes and paraphrases of the early Church Fathers on the first three chapters of Genesis. In this article, I analyzed book VI of the Commentary to the Book of Genesis (PG 89, 921-938) by Anastasius of Sinai, in which Anastasius comments, inter alia, the verse from Genesis 1, 26. The main goal of my analysis was to answer the question whether Anastasius – the Byzantine exegete – in her exegesis of the Holy Scriptures, using the earlier considerations of the Fathers of the Church, is at least to a small extent original or uncritical rewrites the previous interpretations, not including any of these interpretations?

Keywords:

St. Anastasius of Sinai, byzantine exegesis, Commentary on the Book of Genesis, Gen 1:26

Anastasius Sinaita, Anagogicarum contemplationum in Hexaëmeron ad Theophilum libri duodecim, PG 89, 851-1078.

Fulgentius Ruspensis, De fide, seu de regula verae fidei ad Petrum, PL 65, 671-708, tłum. W. Szołdrski: Fulgencjusz z Ruspe, O wierze czyli o regule prawdziwej wiary do Piotra, w: Studia i teksty patrystyczne, red. A. Bober, Kraków 1967.

Gregorius Nyssenus, De hominis opificio, PG 44, 123-256, tłum. M. Przyszychowska: Grzegorz z Nyssy, O stworzeniu człowieka, ŹMT 39, Kraków 2006.

Irenaeus Lugdunensis, Adversus haereses V, ed. A. Rousseau – L. Doutreleau – Ch. Mercier, SCh 152-153, Paris 1969.

Joannes Chrysostomus, In Genesim sermones, PG 54, 581-630, tłum. S. Kaczmarek: Św. Jan Chryzostom, Homilie na Księgę Rodzaju (seria pierwsza: Rdz 1-3), ŹMT 45, Kra¬ków 2008.

Origenes, De principiis, ed. H. Crouzel – M. Simonetti, I-II, SCh 252-253, Paris 1978; III-IV, SCh 268-269, Paris 1980, tłum. S. Kalinkowski: Orygenes, O zasadach, ŹMT 1, Kraków 1996.

Tertullianus, Adversus Praxean, PL 2, 153-196, tłum. E. Buszewicz, Tertulian, Przeciw Prakseaszowi, w: Trójca Święta: Tertulian, Przeciw Prakseaszowi, Hipolit, Przeciw Noetosowi, ŹMT 4, Kraków 1997.

Czyżewski B., „Uczyńmy człowieka na nasz obraz, podobnego nam” (Rdz 1, 26) w interpretacji Ojców Kościoła, SG 25 (2011) 113-126.

Kuehn C.-A. – Baggarly J.-D., Anastasius of Sinai: Hexaemeron, OCA 278, Rome 2007.

Letellier R.-I., Creation, Sin and Reconciliation: Reading Primordial and Patriarchal Narrative in the Book of Genesis, Cambridge 2015.

Paczkowski M., „Uczyńmy człowieka”. Historia interpretacji teologicznej Rdz 1, 26 od Filona Aleksandryjskiego po początek IV wieku, BPTh 4 (2011) 273-308. (Crossref)

Plezia M., Słownik łacińsko-polski, I-V, Warszawa 2007.

SzczurP., Dzieło stworzenia w „Homiliach na Księgę Rodzaju” św. Jana Chryzostoma, BPTh 4 (2011) 321-339. (Crossref)

Thomas D. – Roggema B., Christian-Muslim Relations. A Bibliographical History, vol. 1: 600-900, Leiden – Boston 2009. (Crossref)


Published
2018-12-12


Jóźwiak, M. (2018). „Et ait: «Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram»” (Rdz 1, 26). Próba egzegezy bizantyńskiej na przykładzie Komentarza do Księgi Rodzaju Anastazego z Synaju. Vox Patrum, 70, 545–557. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.3221

Magdalena Jóźwiak 
Uniwersytet Wrocławski



License

Papers published in Vox Patrum are covered by the Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) licence. Authors and users can use published works licensed under the CC-BY-ND since 2018. For earlier publications, copyrights are available under fair use rights in accordance with the Act of February 4, 1994 on copyrights and related rights.