Σχεσισ and ομοουσιοσ in Gregory of Nyssa’s Contra Eunomium: metaphysical contest and gains to trinitarian thought
The development of Trinitarian thought that occurred in Gregory of Nyssa’s Contra Eunomium has led some to think that in his debate with Eunomius Gregory introduced a tritheist mode of thinking (G.C. Stead). In having recourse to the scšsij of the Father and of the Son in his polemic with Eunomius, he actually facilitates a recovery of the sense of ÐmooÚsioj in continuity with the doctrine of the two natures as introduced by Athanasius and Basil in the latter’s initial response to Eunomius. However, this simultaneously marks a difference in the notion of fÚsij, which is at the level of divinity and has repercussions even in created nature. This paper seeks to show the substance of this variation, something that on account of Eunomian heresy has been introduced by Gregory of Nyssa.
Gregory of Nyssa; Contra Eunomium; metaphysics; Trinitarian theology
Basilius Caesariensis, Epistulae, ed. Y. Courtonne: Saint Basile, Lettres, I, Paris 1957.
Eunomius, Apologia, ed. R.P. Vaggione, in: Eunomius, The Extant Works, Oxford 1987, 43-75.
Gregorius Nyssenus, Contra Eunomium, ed. W. Jaeger, GNO 1-2, Leiden 1960.
Gregorius Nyssenus, In Canticum canticorum, ed. H. Langerbeck, GNO 6, Leiden 1960.
Gregorius Nyssenus, Refutatio confessionis Eunomii, ed. W. Jaeger, GNO 2, Leiden 1960, 312-410.
Cavalcanti E., Studi Eunomiani, Roma 1976.
Daniélou J. , Eunome l’arien et l’exégèse néo-platonicienne du Cratyle, REG 69 (1956) 412-432.
Daniélou J. , L’être et le temps chez Grégoire de Nysse, Leiden 1970.
Stead C.G., Ontology and terminology in Gregory of Nyssa (1976), in: idem, Substance and Illusion in the Christian Fathers, London 1985, 107-127.
Stead C.G., Philosophy in Christian Antiquity, Cambridge 1994.
Stead C.G., The Significance of the Homoousios (1961), in: idem, Substance and illusion in the Christian Fathers, London 1985, 397-412.
Tuilier A., Le sense tu term omoousios dans le vocabulaire théologique d’Arius et de l’Ecole d’Antioque, StPatr 3 (1961) 421-430.