Natural Sciences and/in Moral Theology: The Case of Free Will
Mateusz Jarmużewski
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle (The Netherlands) , Netherlandshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-1398
Abstract
The issue of free will, supporting moral responsibility in various accounts of Catholic moral theology, is in a particular way situated at the crossroads of theological and non-theological disciplines. Because of its connection to philosophy, as well as to natural and empirical sciences, the topic enjoys growing interdisciplinary attention. Early studies in cognitive neuroscience of volition, inspired by the experiment of Libet (1983), suggest that free will is an illusion because our conscious intentions do not cause corresponding actions: these are initiated earlier by the unconscious brain processes. While this seems to conflict with fundamental anthropological and ethical assumptions, a closer look renders such a worry immature. The more traditional, pre-modern notion of what willing, intending and choosing actually means – and how does it relate to us having free will or not – proves largely intact by the Libet-style argumentation. At the same time, new developments within a multidisciplinary science of volition highlight several aspects of freedom and agency that could be central to the way humans produce actions and control their lives. Implications from these studies might provoke some reformulations on the side of theological ethics. They might also set forth some particular schools and traditions, such as Christian virtue ethics, as theologically preferable. All this on the condition that a kind of knowledge coming from natural sciences – which often already contains a measure of (theological) interpretation– can be seen as both relevant and integrable in theological methodology and insight. Anthropological and ethical realms strike as particularly suitable for such integration: the essential embodiment of personal agency definitely deserves more attention, also for clarifying its free and indeed moral predicate.
Keywords:
free will, natural sciences, cognitive neuroscience, moral theology, virtue ethics, theological methodologyReferences
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. H. Rackham, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1990.
Asma L., Consciousness in Intentional Action, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Depart- ment of Philosophy, Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit 2018.
Bayne T., Libet and the Case for Free Will Scepticism, in: R. Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science (British Academy Original Paperbacks), Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011, pp. 25-46. (Crossref)
Bode S. et al., Predicting Perceptual Decision Biases from Early Brain Activity, “Journal of Neuroscience” 32 (2012), no. 36, pp. 12488-12498. (Crossref)
Bonicalzi S., Haggard P., From “Freedom From” to “Freedom To”: New Perspectives on Intentional Action, “Frontiers in Psychology” 10 (2019), article 1193, pp. 10-11, https:// www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01193/full [accessed: 10 II 2019]. (Crossref)
Bourke V., Ethics: A Textbook in Moral Philosophy, New York: The Macmillan Company 1951.
Davidson D., Actions, Reasons, and Causes, “Journal of Philosophy” 60 (1963), no. 23, p. 685-700. (Crossref)
Frankfurt H.G., The Problem of Action, “American Philosophical Quarterly” 15 (1978), no. 2, pp. 157-162.
Fried I., Mukamel R., Kreiman G., Internally Generated Preactivation of Single Neurons in Human Medial Frontal Cortex Predicts Volition, “Neuron” 69 (2011), no. 3, pp. 548-562. Haggard P., Does Brain Science Change Our View on Free Will?, in: R. Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science (British Academy Original Paperbacks), Oxford: Oxford (Crossref)
University Press 2011, pp. 7-24.
Haggard P., Eimer M., On the Relation between Brain Potentials and the Awareness of
Voluntary Movements, “Experimental Brain Research” 126 (1999), no. 1, pp. 128-133. Hameroff S., Penrose R., Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory, “Physics of Life Reviews” 11 (2014), no. 1, pp. 39-78.
Harak G.S., Virtuous Passions: The Formation of Christian Character, Reissue edition, Broadway: Wipf & Stock 1993.
Heisenberg M., Is Free Will an Illusion?, “Nature” 459 (2009), no. 7244, pp. 164-165. Kagaya K., Takahata M., Readiness Discharge for Spontaneous Initiation of Walking in Crayfish, “Journal of Neuroscience” 30 (2010), no. 4, pp. 1348-1362. (Crossref)
Kane R., Libertarianism, in: J. Fisher et al. (eds.), Four Views on Free Will, Oxford: Blackwell 2007, pp. 5-43.
Lavazza A., Free Will and Neuroscience: From Explaining Freedom Away to New Ways of Operationalizing and Measuring It, “Frontiers in Human Neuroscience” 10 (2016), pp. 1-17, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00262/full [acces- sed: 20 II 2019]. (Crossref)
Libet B., Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action, “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 8 (1985), no. 4, pp. 529-539. (Crossref)
Libet B. et al., Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential). The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act, “Brain: A Journal of Neurology” 106 (1983), pp. 623-642. (Crossref)
McFadden J., The CEMI Field Theory Closing the Loop, “Journal of Consciousness Studies” 20 (2013), no. 1-2, pp. 1-2.
McFadden J., Al-Khalili J., Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology, Reprint edition, New York: Crown Publishers 2016.
Mele A., Effective Intentions: The Power of Conscious Will, New York: Oxford University Press 2009. (Crossref)
Moreno A., Mossio M., Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences 12), Dordrecht: Springer 2015, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-9837-2 [accessed: 9 V 2017].
Nachev P., Hacker P., The Neural Antecedents to Voluntary Action: A Conceptual Analysis, “Cognitive Neuroscience” 5 (2014), no. 3-4, pp. 193-208. (Crossref)
O’Connell T., Principles for a Catholic Morality, New York: Seabury Press 1978. Pereboom D., Hard Incompatibilism, in: J. Fisher (eds.), Four Views on Free Will, Oxford: Blackwell 2007, pp. 85-125.
Pockett S., Field Theories of Consciousness, “Scholarpedia” 8 (2013), no. 12, p. 4951, http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Field_theories_of_consciousness [accessed: 26 I 2017]. (Crossref)
Schurger A., Mylopoulos M., Rosenthal D., Neural Antecedents of Spontaneous Volunta- ry Movement: A New Perspective, “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 20 (2016), no. 2, pp. 77-79. (Crossref)
Schurger A., Uithol S., Nowhere and Everywhere: The Causal Origin of Voluntary Action, “Review of Philosophy and Psychology” 6 (2015), no. 4, pp. 761-778. (Crossref)
Shapiro L., Dynamics and Cognition, “Minds and Machines” 23 (2013), no. 3, pp. 353-375. Soon C.S. et al., Unconscious Determinants of Free Decisions in the Human Brain, “Nature Neuroscience” 11 (2008), no. 5, pp. 543-545. (Crossref)
Stump E., The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions, “Faith and Philosophy” 28 (2011), no. 1, pp. 29-43. (Crossref)
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, 2nd revised edition [1920], ed. K. Knight, 2006, http://www.newadvent.org/summa/ [accessed: 30 X 2013].
Tse P. U., The Neural Basis of Free Will: Criterial Causation, Cambridge, MA – London: MIT Press 2013. (Crossref)
Varela F., Principles of Biological Autonomy, New York: North Holland 1979.
Verplaetse J., Zonder vrije wil: een filosofisch essay over verantwoordelijkheid, Amsterdam: Nieuwezijds 2011.
Waller B.N., The Natural Selection of Autonomy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press 1998.
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Zwolle (The Netherlands) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-1398
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International License.
