God and Self in Confessiones IV and Beyond: Therapeia, Self-Presence, and Ontological Contingency in Augustine, Seneca, and Heidegger
Matthew William Knotts
Loyola Academy, Theology Department, Wilmette, Illinois, USA , United StatesAbstract
This article investigates Augustine’s reflection on the death of his friend in Confessiones IV. A critical treatment of this passage discloses the three key themes which will form the main substance of the analysis: self-presence, the contingency of being, and divine absence. Integrating philosophical and theological methodologies with an historical-critical treatment of Augustine’s work, this article relates Augustine’s insights to his foregoing classical context and his reception in posterity, with particular attention to Lucius Annaeus Seneca (ca. 4 BCE-65 CE) and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976). This investigation shows that these three figures are connected by an appreciation of how self-presence and ontological instability are constant facets of human life, though easily neglected. Each advocates a curriculum of philosophical training, whereby one learns to pacify the mind by an awareness of the true nature of mundane reality. This research contributes to the renewed appreciation of how the therapeutic aspects of classical philosophy influenced early Christian authors; illuminates a key episode in Augustine’s life en route to his conversion to Christianity; and raises questions about the “apophatic” dimensions of Augustine’s theology and anthropology.
Keywords:
Augustine, Confessiones, Therapeia, Facticity, Death, Seneca, HeideggerReferences
Augustinus, Confessiones, ed. J.J. O’Donnell, Oxford 1992, in: https://www.stoa.org/hippo/ (accessed: 15.03.2022), tr. F.J. Sheed, ed. M. Foley, Augustine, Confessiones, Indianapolis – Cambridge 2006.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium, ed. R. Gummere, London 1917-1925, tr. M. Graver – A.A. Long, Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Letters on Ethics to Lucilius, The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Chicago – London 2015.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Naturales quaestiones, tr. M. Graver – A.A. Long, Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Natural Questions, The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Chicago – London 2010.
Arrien S.-J., Penser sans Dieu, vivre avec Dieu: Heidegger lecteur d’Augustin, “Esprit” 1 (2013) p. 68-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/espri.1301.0068
Brachtendorf J., Cicero and Augustine on the Passions, “Revue des Études Augustiniennes” 43 (1997) p. 289-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.REA.5.104767
Coyne R., Heidegger’s Confessions: The Remains of Being and Time in St. Augustine and Beyond, Chicago – London 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226209449.001.0001
Cushman R., Therapeia: Plato’s Conception of Philosophy, New Brunswick – London 2002.
Fischer N., Vom Beruhren der ewigen Wahrheit zu Augustins christlicher Umdeutung der neuplatonischen Mystik, “Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica” 3/1 (2013) p. 37-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363398.2015.32
Foley M., Cicero, Augustine, and the Philosophical Roots of the Cassiciacum Dialogues, “Revue des Études Augustiniennes” 43 (1999) p. 51-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.REA.5.104795
Gill C., The Ancient Self: Issues and Approaches, in: Ancient Philosophy of the Self, ed. P. Remes – J. Sihvola, Springer 2008, p. 35-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8596-3_2
Hannan S., To See Coming: Augustine and Heidegger on the Arising and Passing Away of Things, “Medieval Mystical Theology” 21/1 (2012) p. 75-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/mmt.v21i1.75
Heidegger M., Being and Time, tr. J. Macquarie – E. Robinson, Oxford – Cambridge 2001.
Huian G., The Mystery of the Human Being in Augustine: In Quest of the Foundations of an Apophatic Anthropology, in: New Europe College Ştefan Odobleja Program Yearbook 2015–2016, ed. A. Pleşu – V. Sandu-Dediu – A. Oroveanu – I. Vainovski-Mihai, Bucharest 2017, p. 53-78.
Kenyon E., Augustine and the Dialogue, Cambridge 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108525558
Köckert C., Augustine and Nebridius (Augustine, epp. 3–14): Two Christian Intellectuals and Their Project of a Philosophical Life, “Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques” 62 (2016) p. 235-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.REA.4.2017034
Lagouanère J., Agustín lector de Séneca: el caso de la bona uoluntas, “Augustinus” 64/252-253 (2019) p. 193-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/augustinus201964252/25313
Löhr W., Christianity as Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives of an Ancient Intellectual Project, “Vigiliae Christianae” 64/2 (2010) p. 160-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007209X453331
Michel A., Dialogue philosophique et vie intérieure: Cicéron, Sénèque, Saint Augustin, “Helmantica” 28 (1977) p. 353-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36576/summa.2954
Parsons W., Freud and Augustine in Dialogue: Psychoanalysis, Mysticism, and the Culture of Modern Spirituality, Charlottesville – London 2013.
Porter J.I., Time for Foucault? Reflections on the Roman Self from Seneca to Augustine, “Foucault Studies” 22 (2017) p. 113-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.5247
Praet D., Augustine of Hippo and Michel Foucault’s History of Sexuality, in: Nos sumus tempora: Studies on Augustine and his Reception Offered to Mathijs Lamberigts, ed. A. Dupont – W. François – J. Leemans, Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 316, Leuven – Paris – Bristol 2020, p. 213-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q26x87.15
Rist J., What is a Person? Realities, Constructs, Illusions, Cambridge 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784160
Star C., Seneca, Understanding Classics, London 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350987999
Stock B., The Integrated Self: Augustine, the Bible, and Ancient Thought, Philadelphia 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293524
Stroumsa G., The New Self and Reading Practices in Late Antique Christianity, “Church History and Religious Culture” 95 (2015) p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18712428-09501002
Ticciati S., A New Apophaticism: Augustine and the Redemption of Signs, Studies in Systematic Theology 14, Leiden 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004258143
Tornau C., Ratio in subiecto? The Sources of Augustine’s Proof for the Immortality of the Soul in the Soliloquia and its Defense in De immortalitate animae, “Phronesis” 62 (2017) p. 319-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341330
Vannier M.-A., Aversion and Conversion, in: The Cambridge Companion to Augustine’s ‘Confessions’, ed. T. Toom, Cambridge 2020, p. 63-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108672405.007
Woollcott P., Some Considerations of Creativity and Religious Experience in St. Augustine of Hippo, “Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 5/2 (1966) p. 273-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1384851
Loyola Academy, Theology Department, Wilmette, Illinois, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-2652
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants the Publisher of the journal "Vox Patrum" a non-exclusive and free license to use the Work submitted for publication for an indefinite period of time on an unlimited territory in the following fields of use:
a. In the field of recording and reproducing the work - producing copies of the work using a specific technique, including printing, reprographic, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b. Within the scope of trading in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - marketing, lending or renting the original or copies;
c. In the scope of disseminating the work in a manner other than specified in point b - public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, as well as making the work available to the public, so that everyone can have access to it at a place and time chosen by them.
Moreover, the Author allows the Publisher free of charge to use and dispose of the compilations of the Works.
The publisher may grant sub-licenses.
Third parties may use the Works and other materials containing or based on the Works in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also known as CC-BY-NC 4.0) license pattern.
