Emotions that Foster Learning: Wonder and Shock in Proclus
Corentin Tresnie
Université Libre de Bruxelles / KU Leuven, Belgium , BelgiumAbstract
In his Commentaries, Proclus (Neoplatonic philosopher, 5th century A.D.) describes the ways in which a teacher can awaken the desire for knowledge and philosophy in a given soul, and help this soul to make cognitive and moral progress. He considers such an intervention to be a case of providence, analogous to both the action of divine Pronoia and the care of one's personal daemon. As the soul being thus educated is still unaware of the merits of rational thought, the teacher needs to use the emotions of his student to stimulate him; he might even want to generate desirable emotions in his soul. I focus here on two emotions: wonder and shock. The first serves to stimulate interest while preserving autonomy. The second allows deeper commitment at the price of reduced autonomy of the pupil. Both are complementary aspects of philosophical perplexity.
Keywords:
Proclus, Neoplatonism, Emotion, Surprise, Fear, Anxiety, Wonder, Fright, Thauma, Learning, Teaching, Autonomy, Mysteries, Reversion, Philosophy, Reason, PassionReferences
Anonymous, Prolegomena Philosophiae Platonicae, ed. L.G. Westerink, Amsterdam 1962.
Aristoteles, Metaphysica, ed. W. Jaeger, Oxford 1957.
Iamblichus, De anima, ed. J. Dillon, Leiden 2002.
Iamblichus, In Platonis Dialogos Commentariorum Fragmenta, ed. J. Dillon, Leiden 1973.
Olympiodorus, In Platonis Alcibiadem primum, ed. L.G. Westerink, Amsterdam 1956.
Olympiodorus, Prolegomena et in Categorias Commentarium, ed. A. Busse, Berlin 1902.
Plato, Alcibiades maior, ed. N. Denyer, Cambridge 2001, tr. W.R.M. Lamb, London 1955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167079
Plato, De republica, ed. S.R. Slings, Oxford 2003.
Plotinus, Opera, ed. P. Henry – H.-R. Schwyzer, Oxford 1964.
Proclus, De decem dubitationibus circa providentiam, ed. D. Isaac, Paris 1977.
Proclus, De malorum subsistentia, ed. D. Isaac, Paris 1982.
Proclus, De providentia et fato et eo quod in nobis ad Theodorum mechanicum, ed. D. Isaac, Paris 1979.
Proclus, Elementatio Theologica, ed. E.R. Dodds, Oxford 1963.
Proclus, In Platonis Alcibiadem primum, ed. A.-P. Segonds, Paris 1985-1986.
Proclus, In Platonis Parmenidem commentaria, ed. C. Luna – A.-P. Segonds, Paris 2007-2021.
Proclus, In Platonis Rempublicam commentarii, ed. W. Kroll, Leipzig 1899-1901.
Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum commentaria, ed. E. Diehl, Leipzig 1903-1906.
Proclus, In primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii, ed. G. Friedlein, Leipzig 1873.
Proclus, Theologia Platonica, ed. H.D. Saffrey – L.G. Westerink, Paris 1968-1997.
Stobaeus, Anthologium, ed. C. Wachsmuth – O. Hense, Berlin 1884-1912.
Addey C., The Daimonion of Socrates: Daimones and Divination in Neoplatonism, in: The Neoplatonic Socrates, ed. D.A. Layne – H. Tarrant, Philadelphia 2014, p. 51-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812210002.51
Ambury J.M., Socratic Character: Proclus on the Function of the Erotic Intellect, in: The Neoplatonic Socrates, ed. D.A. Layne – H. Tarrant, Philadelphia 2014, p. 109-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812210002.109
Beierwaltes W., Proklos’ Begriff des Guten aus der Perspektive seiner Platon-Deutung, in: Being or Good? Metamorphoses of Neoplatonism, ed. A. Kijewska, Lublin 2004, p. 99-120.
Bowden H., Mystery Cults of the Ancient World, Princeton 2010.
D’Andrès N., Socrate néoplatonicien: Une science de l’amour dans le commentaire de Proclus sur le Premier Alcibiade, Paris 2020.
Erler M., Hilfe der Götter und Erkenntnis der Selbst: Sokrates als Göttergeschenk bei Platon und den Platonikern, in: Metaphysik und Religion: Zur Signatur des spätantiken Denkens, ed. T. Kobusch – M. Erler, Leipzig 2002, p. 387-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110975529.387
Festugière A.J., L’ordre de lecture des dialogues de Platon aux Ve/VIe siècles, “Museum Helveticum” 26/4 (1969) p. 281-296.
Graf F., Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenisticher Zeit, Berlin 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856576
Giel L.I.S. et al., Fear of failure: A polynomial regression analysis of the joint impact of the perceived learning environment and personal achievement goal orientation, “Anxiety, Stress & Coping” 33/2 (2020) p. 123-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1695603
Hadot P., L’union de l’âme avec l’intellect divin dans l’expérience mystique plotinienne, in: Proclus et son influence (Actes du Colloque de Neuchâtel, juin 1985), ed. G. Boss – G. Seel, Zürich 1987, p. 3-27.
Helmig C., What is the systematic place of abstraction and concept formation in Plato’s philosophy? Ancient and modern readings of Phaedrus 249b-c, in: Platonic ideas and concept formation in ancient and medieval thought, ed. A. Macé – G. Van Riel, Leuven 2004, p. 83-97.
Helmig C., Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition, Berlin 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110267242
Helmig C., Proclus on Epistemology, Language, and Logic, in: All From One: A Guide to Proclus, ed. P. d’Hoine – M. Martijn, Oxford 2017, p. 183-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640331.003.0009
Hoffman P., What was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators, in: A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. M.L. Gill – P. Pellegrin, Oxford 2006, p. 597-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305845.ch31
L’Ecuyer C., The Wonder Approach to Learning, “Frontiers in Human Neuroscience” 8 (2014), in: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00764 (accessed: 15.03.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00764
MacIsaac D.G., The Nous of the Partial Soul in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, “Dionysius” 29 (2011) p. 29-60.
Nussbaum M.C., The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton 1994.
O’Meara D.J., La science métaphysique (ou théologique) de Proclus comme exercice spirituel, in: Proclus et la théologie platonicienne: Actes du Colloque international de Louvain, 13-16 mai 1998, en l’honneur de H.D. Saffrey et L.G. Westerink, ed. A.P. Segonds – C. Steel, Louvain – Paris 2000, p. 279-290.
O’Meara D.J., Platonopolis: Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Oxford 2003.
Oudeyer P.-Y. – Gottlieb J. – Lopes M., Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning: Theory and applications in educational technologies, “Progress in Brain Research” 229 (2016) p. 257-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005
Rist J.M., Integration and the Undescended Soul in Plotinus, “The American Journal of Philology” 88/4 (1967) p. 410-422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/292777
Robinson D.L., Brain function, mental experience and personality, “The Netherlands Journal of Psychology” 64 (2009) p. 152-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03076418
Sheppard A., Studies on the 5th and 6th essays of Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic, Göttingen 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251573
Sheppard A., The Poetics of Phantasia. Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics, London 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119009795.ch23
St-Germain P., Mythe et éducation: Proclus et la critique platonicienne de la poésie, “Laval théologique et philosophique” 62/2 (2006) p. 301-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/014283ar
Steel C., The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus, Brussels 1978.
Steel C., Providence and Evil, in: All From One: A Guide to Proclus, ed. P. d’Hoine – M. Martijn, Oxford 2017, p. 240-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640331.003.0012
Tarrant H. – Renaud F. – Baltzly D. – Layne D.A., Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity, Leiden 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355385
Timotin A., La démonologie platonicienne: Histoire de la notion de daimōn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens, Leiden – Boston 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004224018
Tornau C., Der Eros und das Gute bei Plotin und Proklos, in: Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, ed. M. Perkams – R.-M. Piccione, Leiden 2006, p. 206-229.
Tresnie C., Orgueil et enseignement: À propos de quelques remarques du Commentaire au Premier Alcibiade de Proclus, “Philosophie Antique” 20 (2020) p. 237-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.3936
Tresnie C., Conflict and Violence in Neoplatonism: From Cosmic Justice to Cognitive Step, “Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence” 5/2 (2021) p. 71-84.
Trouillard J., Le sens des médiations proclusiennes, “Revue philosophique de Louvain” 47 (1957) p. 331-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1957.4921
Tyng C.M. – Amin H.U. – Saad M.N.M. – Malik A.S., The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory, “Frontiers in Psychology” 8 (2017) p. 14-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
van den Berg R.M., Proclus and Iamblichus on Moral Education, “Phronesis” 59/3 (2014) p. 272-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341269
van den Berg R.M., Proclus’ Hymns: Essays, Translations, Commentary, Leiden 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047401032
van den Berg R.M., Proclus on Hesiod’s Works and Days and ‘Didactic’ Poetry, “Classical Quarterly” 64/1 (2014) p. 383-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838813000773
Université Libre de Bruxelles / KU Leuven, Belgium https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1446-3001
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants the Publisher of the journal "Vox Patrum" a non-exclusive and free license to use the Work submitted for publication for an indefinite period of time on an unlimited territory in the following fields of use:
a. In the field of recording and reproducing the work - producing copies of the work using a specific technique, including printing, reprographic, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b. Within the scope of trading in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - marketing, lending or renting the original or copies;
c. In the scope of disseminating the work in a manner other than specified in point b - public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, as well as making the work available to the public, so that everyone can have access to it at a place and time chosen by them.
Moreover, the Author allows the Publisher free of charge to use and dispose of the compilations of the Works.
The publisher may grant sub-licenses.
Third parties may use the Works and other materials containing or based on the Works in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also known as CC-BY-NC 4.0) license pattern.
