Clement of Alexandria’s Homily "Quis Dives Salvetur?" and Its Pastoral Challenges for Alexandrian Christians
Jana Plátová
Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic , CzechiaAbstract
The article reconsiders the structure of Clement’s writing Quis dives salvetur? and as a consequence questions the traditional designation of this text as a homily. In the first part, the article focuses on the Gospel text quoted by Clement and attempts to explain some of the unusual choices of the text. In the second part, it highlights some pastorally interesting or, on the contrary, controversial aspects of Clement’s interpretation: (a) the use of the Stoic concept of indifferent things, which makes it possible to give emphasis to the freedom of human decision; (b) the thorough justification of the allegorical interpretation of Mk 10, 21; (c) the pastoral project of the “divine business” based on Lk 16, 9 and finally (d) the possibility of a second repentance after baptism justified by the story of the Apostle John.
Keywords:
Clement of Alexandria, Quis dives salvetur?, Interpretation of Mk 10,17-31, Early Christian homiletics, Biblical exegesis, Allegorical interpretationReferences
Acta Iohannis, ed. E. Junod – J.D. Kaestli, CCAp 2, Turnhout 1983.
Clemens Alexandrinus, Protrepticus und Paedagogus, ed. O. Stählin – U. Treu, GCS 12, Berlin 1972.
Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata I-VIII, ed. O. Stählin – L. Früchtel – U. Treu, GCS 17, 52, Berlin 1970-1985.
Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata VII-VIII, Excerpta ex Theodoto, Eclogae propheticae, Quis dives salvetur, Fragmente, ed. O. Stählin – L. Früchtel – U. Treu, GCS 17, Berlin 1970, tr. G.W. Butterwoth, Clement of Alexandria, The Exhortation to the Greeks. The Rich Man’s Salvation. To the Newly Baptized, LCL 92, Cambridge 1968, p. 270-367.
Clemens Alexandrinus, Register, ed. O. Stählin – U. Treu, GCS 39, Berlin 1980.
Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica I-VII, ed. G. Bardy, SCh 31, Paris 1952; SCh 41, Paris 1978.
Novum Testamentum Graece, ed. E. Nestle – K. Aland et al. Stuttgart 2012, tr. New International Version (NIV) 2011 and New American Standard Version (NAS) 1977. Studies
Cosaert C.P., The Text of the Gospels in Clement of Alexandria, Leiden – Boston 2008.
Donahue J.R., Stoic Indifferents and Christian Indifferents in Clement of Alexandria, “Traditio” 19 (1963) p. 438-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900010473
Gnilka J., Das Evangelium nach Markus, Evangelisch-katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 2/2, Zürich 1979.
Grossi V., Nota sulla pastorale giovanile nella chiesa antica. A proposito di un diverbio tra l’apostolo Giovanni e un vescovo locale asiatico (Clemente Alessandrino, Quis dives salvetur 42,), “Lateranum” 71 (2005) p. 313-318.
Hausschild W.D., Christentum und Eigentum. Zum Problem eines altkirchlichen “Sozialismus”, “Zeitschrift für die Evangelische Ethik” 16 (1972) p. 34-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-1972-0105
Hengel M., Eigentum und Reichtum in der frühen Kirche. Aspekte einer frühchristlichen Sozialgeschichte, Stuttgart 1973.
Hoek van den A., Techniques of Quotation in Clement of Alexandria. A View of Ancient Literary Working Methods, “Vigiliae Christianae” 50/3 (1996) p. 223-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007296X00184
Hoek van den A., Widening the Eye of the Needle: Wealth and Poverty in the Works of Clement of Alexandria, in: Wealthe and Poverty in Early Church and Society, ed. S.R. Holman, Grand Rapids 2008, p. 67-75.
Junod E., Un écho d’un controverse autour de la pénitence: l’histoire de l’apotre Jean et du chef des brigands chez Clément d’Alexandrie (QDS 42,1-15), “Revue d ́histoire et de philosophie religieuses” 60 (1980) p. 153-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rhpr.1980.4536
Kannengiesser Ch., Handbook of Patristic Exegesis: The Bible in Ancient Christianity, v. 1, Leiden – Boston 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004531529_006
King D.D.M., The Peculiar Edition of the Rich Young Ruler in Clement of Alexandria’s Quis Dives Salvetur, in: Studia Patristica 110/7: Clement of Alexandria, ed. M. Vinzent – V. Hušek, Leuven – Paris – Bristol 2021, p. 177-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27vt524.15
Kok M.J., The Gospel on the Margins: The Reception of Mark in the Second Century, Minneapolis 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9m0tkt
Le Boulluec A., La lettre sur l’Évangile secret de Marc et le Quis dives salvetur? de Clément d’Alexandrie, “Apokrypha” 7 (1996) p. 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.300987
Méhat A., “Pénitence seconde” et “péché involontaire” chez Clément d’Alexandrie, “Vigiliae Christianae” 8 (1954) p. 225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007254X00207
Monfrinotti M., Quis dives salvetur? Ricezione ed esegesi di Mc. 10,17-31, “Augustinianum” 2 (2013) p. 305-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/agstm201353220
Monfrinotti M., Mc. 10,17-31: dal Quis dives salvetur? al Codice neotestamentario Alessandrino, in: Povertà e ricchezza nel cristianesimo antico (I-V sec.). XLII Incontro di Studiosi dell’Antichità Cristiana, SEA 145, Roma 2016, p. 131-139.
Monfrinotti M., Mc 10,24 in Quis dives 4,9: sulla lezione τοὺς πεποιθότας ἐπὶ χρήμασιν, “Rivista Biblica” 69/1 (2021) p. 63-87.
Nardi C., Clemente Alessandrino, Quale ricco si salva? Il cristiano e l’economia, Roma 1991.
Nardi C., Clemente di Alessandria, in: La Bibbia nell’antichità cristiana I. Da Gesù a Origene, ed. E. Norelli, Bologna 1993, p. 361-376.
O’Brien D.P., The Pastoral Function of the Second Repentance for Clement of Alexandria, „Studia Patristica” 41 (2006) p. 219-224.
Plátová J., The Text of Mark 10:29–30 in Quis dives salvetur? by Clement of Alexandria, in: The Process of Authority. The Dynamics in Transmission and Reception of Canonical Texts, ed. J. Dušek – J. Roskovec, Berlin – Boston 2016, p. 253-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110399394-016
Plátová J., Klementovo kázání Který boháč bude spasen? jako pramen Zlaté legendy, “Studia Theologica” 21/3 (2019) p. 45-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/sth.2019.009
Quasten J., Patrology, v. 2: The ante-nicene literature after Irenaeus, Allen 1999.
Ritter A.M., Christentum und Eigentum bei Klemens von Alexandrien auf dem Hintergrund der frühchristlichen „Armenfrömmigkeit” und der Ethik der kaiserzeitlichen Stoa, „Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte” 86 (1975) p. 1-25.
Ulrich J., Clemens Alexandrinus’ Quis dives salvetur als Paradigma für die Beurteilung von Reichtum und Geld in der Alten Kirche, in: Gott und Geld, ed. M. Ebner et al., Jahrbuch für biblische Theologie 21, Neukirchen-Vluyn 2007, p. 213-238.
Taylor V., The Gospel according to St. Mark, London 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00569-7
Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-6613
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants the Publisher of the journal "Vox Patrum" a non-exclusive and free license to use the Work submitted for publication for an indefinite period of time on an unlimited territory in the following fields of use:
a. In the field of recording and reproducing the work - producing copies of the work using a specific technique, including printing, reprographic, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b. Within the scope of trading in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - marketing, lending or renting the original or copies;
c. In the scope of disseminating the work in a manner other than specified in point b - public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, as well as making the work available to the public, so that everyone can have access to it at a place and time chosen by them.
Moreover, the Author allows the Publisher free of charge to use and dispose of the compilations of the Works.
The publisher may grant sub-licenses.
Third parties may use the Works and other materials containing or based on the Works in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also known as CC-BY-NC 4.0) license pattern.
