Tree pruning in the structural approach to vowel reduction and lenition
Karolina Drabikowska
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-6661
Abstract
The article scrutinises several vowel reduction and lenition phenomena by employing a model of syntax-like structural representations, i.e. Government Phonology 2.0. In contrast to the standard GP model, whereby lenition and vowel reduction can be viewed as shortening, element suppression or status switching, the structural approach employs the procedure of tree pruning with a heavily limited role of melodic annotation. This paper will take a closer look at node removal with special attention to its trajectory. In particular, two basic directionalities are considered: top-down and bottom-up. The former has been proposed to account for vowel reduction whereby the highest positions are deleted retaining the head and potentially its sister. The acquisition of plosives and fricatives points to the latter trajectory, which disposes of nodes closer to the head. However, the choice of positions that are targeted in weak contexts might be also related to the inherently encoded hierarchy of terminal nodes within the constituents in question.
Keywords:
vowel reduction, lenition, structure, tree pruning, phonological representationReferences
Anderson, J. M. 1996. The representation of vowel reduction: Non-specification and reduction in Old English and Bulgarian. Studia Linguistica 50: 91–105. (Crossref)
Backley, P. 2011. An introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Backley, P. 2017. Headedness in Element Theory: The case for multiple heads. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1)/89: 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.463. (Crossref)
Backley, P., and K. Nasukawa. 2009. Representing labials and velars: A single ‘dark’ element. Phonological Studies 12: 3–10.
Bauer, L. 1988. What is lenition? Linguistics 24: 381–392. (Crossref)
Bernhardt, B. H., and J. P. Stemberger. 1998. Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based non-linear phonology. San Diego: San Diego University Press.
Bloch-Rozmej, A. 1998. Element interactions in phonology. A study in Connemara Irish. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.
Bloch-Rozmej, A. 2011. Noise as a phonological element: On the representation of plosives and affricates. In: M. Pawlak and J. Bielak (eds.), New perspectives in language, discourse and translation studies. Second language learning and teaching, 13–23. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. (Crossref)
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cyran, E. 2010. Complexity scales and licensing in phonology. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. (Crossref)
Cristófaro Silva, T. 1992. Nuclear phenomena in Brazilian Portuguese. Ph.D. diss., University of London.
de Carvalho, J. B., Scheer T., and P. Ségéral (eds.) 2008. Lenition and fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Drabikowska, K. 2019. Substance and function of phonological primes in the Government Phonology tradition. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Escure, G. 1977. Hierarchies and phonological weakening. Lingua 43: 55–64. (Crossref)
Ewen, C., and H. van der Hulst. 2001. The phonological structure of words: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Giannelli, L., and L. Savoia. 1979. Indebolimento consonantico in Toscana. Revista italiana di diallettologia 2: 23–58.
Harris, J. 1990. Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7: 255–300. (Crossref)
Harris, J. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harris, J. 1996. Phonological output is redundancy-free and fully interpretable. In J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology. Models and Methods, 305–332. Salford, Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford.
Harris, J. 2005. Vowel reduction as information loss. In P. Carr, J. Durand and C. J. Ewen (eds.), Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity, 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. (Crossref)
Jaskuła, K. 2006. Ancient sound changes and Old Irish phonology. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Kaye, J. 1990. ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology 7: 301–330. (Crossref)
Kaye, J. 1992. On the interaction of theories of Lexical Phonology and theories of phonological phenomena. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer and J. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1988. Proceedings of the 6th International Phonology Meeting, 141–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm J., and J.-R. Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7: 193–231. (Crossref)
Martinet, A. 1952. Celtic lenition and Western Romance consonants. Language 28: 192–217. (Crossref)
McCone, K. 1996. Towards a relative chronology of ancient and mediaeval Celtic sound change. Maynooth: St. Patrick’s College.
Millar, R. M., and L. Trask. 2015. Trask’s historical linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. (Crossref)
Oftedal, M. 1985. Lenition in Celtic and in Insular Spanish. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Pöchtrager, M. 2006. The structure of length. Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna.
Pöchtrager, M. 2010. The structure of A. Paper presented at the 33rd GLOW Colloquium, 13–16 April. Wrocław, Poland.
Pöchtrager, M. 2016a. It’s all about size. In P. Szigetvári (ed.), 47 snippets to Mark Adam Nadasdy’s 70th birthday. Retrieved from http://seas3.elte.hu/nadasdy70/pochtrager.html.
Pöchtrager, M. 2016b. A structural approach to vowel reduction. Paper presented at Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics: 32nd Annual Meeting. 25–26 October. Jerusalem.
Pöchtrager, M. 2018. Sawing off the branch you are sitting on. Acta Linguistica Academica 65: 47–68. (Crossref)
Pöchtrager, M., and J. Kaye. 2010. Dial A for adjunction. Paper presented at the Old World Conference in Phonology 7: 28–30 January. Nice.
Pöchtrager, M., and J. Kaye. 2013. GP 2.0. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 51–64.
Savoia, L. M. 2015. I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa: Pacini Editore.
Scheer, T., and P. Ségéral. 2008. Positional factors in lenition and fortition. In J. B. de Carvalho, T. Scheer and P. Ségéral (eds.) Lenition and fortition, 131–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Crossref)
Úlfsbjörninn, S. 2008. The formal dynamism of categories: Stops vs. fricatives, primitivity vs. simplicity. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44: 121–146. (Crossref)
Živanović, S., and M. Pöchtrager. 2010. GP 2.0 and Putonghua too. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57: 357–380. (Crossref)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-6661
