Abandoning the EPP-feature in Polish dual copula clauses by redefining the predication relation
Abstract
This paper questions the logic behind the presence and the working of the EPP-feature in Polish dual copula clauses (henceforth, DCCs) with the pronominal copula to, the verbal copula być ‘to be’, and two nominative 3rd person DPs, as represented in Bondaruk (2019). The criticism follows from: (i) – Chomsky’s (2000, 2001) downward Agree operation; (ii) – the view that the predicator encodes the predication relation between the pre-copular subject and the post-copular predicate; (iii) – selective multiple Agree, whereby the satisfaction of the EPP- and uφ-features is divorced. Adopting (i)–(iii), Bondaruk’s scrutiny allows either the pre- or the post-copular DP to occupy SpecTP, thereby accounting for DCCs’ agreement and configurational patterns, but, simultaneously, suffering from theoretical shortcomings it creates. We argue for a simpler satisfaction of the subject requirement which does not rely on the troublesome EPP-feature, but is motivated formally by the relation between T and the higher DP. We derive this requirement by following Zeiljstra’s (2012) upward Agree which only takes place once interpretable features c-command uninterpretable features, and Rothstein’s (2004) approach which is based on a neo-Davidsonian event semantics and which argues that be and its complement form a complex predicate, separated from the pre-copular DP both semantically and syntactically.
Keywords:
EPP, predication, proposition, dual copula clauses (DCCs), AgreeReferences
Adger, D., and G. Ramchand. 2003. Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 325–360. (Crossref)
Al-Horais, N. 2013. The minimalist program and its new insight to the concept of universal grammar. Journal of Universal Language 14(2): 79–112. (Crossref)
Alboiu, G. 2000. The features of movement in Romanian. Ph.D. diss., University of Manitoba.
Alexiadou, A., and E. Anagnostopoulou. 2001. The subject in situ generalization, and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231. (Crossref)
Alexiadou, A., and E. Anagnostopoulou. 2007. The subject in situ generalization revisited. In H.-M. Gärtner and U. Sauerland (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, 31–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Allharbi, B. Y. 2017. The syntax of copular clauses in Arabic. Ph.D. diss, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Benmamoun, E. 2000. The feature structure of functional morphology: Problems of projection representation and derivation. Ph.D. diss, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Benmamoun, E. 2008. Clause structure and the syntax of verbless sentences. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 105–131. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Crossref)
Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de linguistiquegénérale, Vol.1.Paris: Gallimard.
Biberauer, T., and I. Roberts. 2010. Subjects, tense and verb-agreement. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 263–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Błaszczak, J., and L. Geist. 2000. Kopulasätze mit den pronominalen Elementen to/ėto im Polnischen und Russischen. ZAS Papers in Linguistics: 115–139. (Crossref)
Błaszczak, J., and L. Geist. 2001.Zur Rolle des Pronomens to/ėto in spezifizierenden Kopulakonstruktionen im Polnischen und Russischen. In G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, U. Mehlhorn, and L. Szucsich (eds.), Current issues in formal Slavic linguistics (Linguistik International 5), 247–257. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Boeckx, C. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bondaruk, A. 2013. Copular clauses in English and Polish: structure, derivation and interpretation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Bondaruk, A. 2014. Characterizing and defining predicational clauses in Polish. In L. Veselovská and M. Janebová (eds.), Complex visible out there. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, 333–348. Olomouc: Palacký University.
Bondaruk, A. 2019. Agreement with the post-verbal DP in Polish dual copula clauses. In M. J. Arche, F. Antonio and R. Marín (eds.), The grammar of copulas across languages, 107–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Bošković, Ž. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Bošković, Ž. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5(3): 167–218. (Crossref)
Bowers, J. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.
Chierchia, G. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaet (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 22–59. New York: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Holland: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequents of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. The minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Crossref)
Citko, B. 2008. Small clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118: 261–295. (Crossref)
den Dikken, M. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predication inversion, and copulas. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Crossref)
Déchaine, R-M. 1993. Predicates across categories: Towards a category-neutral syntax. Ph.D. diss, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
Doron, E. 1986. The pronominal “copula” as agreement clitic. In H. Borer (ed.), Syntax of pronominal clitics, 313–332. New York: Academic Press.
Frege, G. 1891/1960. Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege. P. Geach and M. Black. Blackwell: Oxford.
Haeberli, E. 2003. Categorial features as the source of EPP and abstract case phenomena. In E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 89–126. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Haider, H. 2015. Head directionality – in syntax and morphology. In A. Fábregas, J. Mateu and M. Putnam (eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters, 73–97. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Haider, H. 2016. The chapter of incredible neglects. In Incredible syntax – between cognitive science and imposture, 1–44, Chapter I. Unpublished manuscript.
Hentschel, G. 2001. On the perspectivisation of noun phrases in copula sentences, mainly in Polish: (Y) to (jest) X and similar phenomena. In V. S. Chrakovskij, M. Grochowski, and G. Hentschel (eds.), Studies on the syntax and semantics of Slavonic languages, 161–213. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
Heycock, C. 2013. The syntax of predication. In M. Den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 322–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Hiraiwa, K. 2002. Multiple Agree. 25th GLOW Workshop: Tools in Linguistic Theory, Utrecht: Institute of Linguistics.
Hiraiwa, K. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Ph.D. diss, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
Holmberg, A. 2000. Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–483. (Crossref)
Holmberg, A. 2010. Null subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, J. 1969. Events and their descriptions: Some considerations. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel, 198–215. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Crossref)
Kim, J. 1976. Events as property exemplifications. In M. Brand and D. Walton (eds.), Action Theory. Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, 159–177. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Crossref)
Kiss, É. 2002. The EPP in a topic-prominent language. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 107–124. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lasnik, H. 2001. A note on the EPP. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 356–362. (Crossref)
Maienborn, C. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 275–316. (Crossref)
Maienborn, C. 2007. On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In I. Comorovski and K. von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 107–130. Dordrecht: Springer. (Crossref)
Maienborn, C. 2011. Event semantics. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 1, chap. 34: 802–829. Berlin: De Gruyter. (Crossref)
Maienborn, C. 2019. Events and states. In R. Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 50¬¬–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
McCloskey, J. 1996. Subjects and subject positions in Irish. In R. D. Borsley and I. Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, 241–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Meillet, A. 1906. La phrase nominaleen indo-européen. Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Paris 14: 1–26.
Mikkelsen, L. 2005. Copular clauses. Specification, predication and equation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Moro, A. 1997. The raising of predicates. Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Parsons, T. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Partee, B. 1987. Noun Phrase interpretation and type shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers. GRASS 8. Dordrecht: Foris. (Crossref)
Partee, B. 2000. Copula inversion puzzles in English and Russian. In K. Kusumoto and E. Villalta (eds.), Issues in semantics, 183–208. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Partee, B. 2010. Specificational copular sentences in Russian and English. In A. Grønn and I. Marijanovic (eds.), Russian in contrast. Grammar, 25–49. Oslo: University of Oslo. (Crossref)
Pesetsky, D., And Torrego, E. 2004. Tense, case and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 295–537. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. (Crossref)
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativised minimality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Roberts, I. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, I., and A. Roussou. 2002. The extended projection principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 125–155. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, S. 1983. The syntactic forms of predication. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge.
Rothstein, S. 1995. Pleonastics and the interpretation of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 499–529.
Rothstein, S. 2004. Predicates and their subjects. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. (Crossref)
Rutkowski, P. 2006. From demonstratives to copulas: A cross-linguistic perspective and the case of Polish. Journal of Universal Language 7: 147–175. (Crossref)
Sigurðsson, H. A. 2003. Case: abstract vs. morphological. In E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister (eds.), New perspectives on case theory, 223–268. CSLI Publications.
Svenonius, P. 2002. Introduction. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 3–28. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tajsner, P. 2015a. On focus marking and predication. Evidence from Polish with some notes on Hausa. Lingua Posnaniensis 57(1): 113–138. (Crossref)
Tajsner, P. 2015b. On specification predication and the derivation of copular to-clauses in Polish. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 50(4): 25–66. (Crossref)
Ura, H. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vangsnes, Ø. 2002. Icelandic expletive constructions and the distribution of subject types. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 43–70. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, E. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1): 203–238.
Woodard, A. 2018. Predication and identity in copular sentences. Ph.D. diss, Durham, Durham University.
Zamparelli, R. 2000. Layers in the determiner phrase. New York: Garland.
Zeiljstra, H. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539. (Crossref)
