Phenomena in Romance verb paradigms: Syncretism, order of inflectional morphemes and thematic vowel
Benedetta Baldi
University of Florence , ItalyLeonardo M. Savoia
University of Florence , Italyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-5629
Abstract
This article aims to propose a treatment of the internal morphological organization of words, based on the idea that morphology is part of syntactic computation. We disagree with Distributed Morphology model, whereby morphology is identified with a post-syntactic component conveying an information ‘separated from the original locus of that information in the phrase marker’ (Embick and Noyer 2001: 557) by rules manipulating syntactic nodes. We also consider inadequate the costly and complex syntactic structures that cartographic approach maps into inflectional strings. We pursue a different conceptualization assuming that morphology is governed by the same rules and principles of syntax. Sub-word elements, including inflections, thematic exponents and clitics, are fully interpretable and enter (pair-)merge operations (in the sense of Chomsky 2020a,b, 2021) according to their content, giving rise to complex words.
Keywords:
morphology, syntax, inflection, thematic vowel, Romance languagesReferences
Anderson, S. 1992, A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Aronoff, M. 1998. Isomorphism and monotonicity. In S. Lapointe, and D. Brentari (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 411–418. Stanford: CA: CSLI,.
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baldi, B., and L. M. Savoia. 2021. Partitives and Indefinites: Phenomena in Italian Varieties. Studia Linguistica: 1–45. Online. (Crossref)
Belvin, R., and M. Den Dikken. 1997. There, happens, to, be, have. Lingua 101: 151–183. (Crossref)
Calabrese, A. 2015. Irregular Morphology and Athematic Verbs in Italo-Romance. Isogloss: 69–102. (Crossref)
Chierchia, G. 1998. Partitives, reference to kinds and semantic variation. In A. Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, VII. 73–98. CLC Publications, Ithaca. (Crossref)
Chomsky, N. 2005. Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22. (Crossref)
Chomsky, N. 2015. Problems of projections. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, and S. Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 3–16. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Chomsky, N. 2020a. The UCLA Lectures (April 29 – May 2, 2019). https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485
Chomsky, N. 2020b. Puzzles about Phases. In L. Franco and P. Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation: Contributions in Honor of M. Rita Manzini, 163–167. Berlin: De Gruyter. (Crossref)
Chomsky, N. 2021. Minimalism: Where Are We Now, and Where Can We Hope to Go, Gengo Kenkyu 160: 1–41.
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. and D. Ott. 2019. Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions, and Challenges. In Á. Gallego, and D. Ott (eds.), Generative Syntax: Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges, Catalan Journal of Linguistics. Special issue, 229–261. (Crossref)
Collins, Ch., and R. Kayne. 2020. Towards a Theory of Morphology as Syntax, online, http://ordinaryworkinggrammarian.blogspot.com/2020/12/towards-theory-of-morphology-as-syntax.html (13.07.2021).
Embick, D. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge. Mass.: The MIT Press. (Crossref)
Embick, D., and R. Noyer. 2001. Movement Operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595 (Crossref)
Franco, L., Manzini, M. R., and L.M. Savoia. 2020. Locative Ps as general relators: Location, direction, DOM in Romance. Linguistic Variation, online https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00035.fra, 2–38. (Crossref)
Halle, M., and A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge Mass-: The MIT Press.
Halle, M., and A. Marantz. 1994. Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology. In A. Carnie, H. Harley, and T. Bures (eds.), Papers on Phonology and Morphology, 275–288. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and W. T. Fitch. 2002. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579. (Crossref)
Manzini, M. R. 2021. Chomsky’s (2020) Links and linker phenomena. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali QULSO online 7: 89–102.
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani. Morfosintassi generativa. 3 vv., Alessandria: dell’Orso.
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects, London: Routledge. (Crossref)
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2011a. Grammatical Categories: Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2011b. Mesoclisis in the imperative: Phonology, morphology or syntax?. Lingua 121: 1101–1120. (Crossref)
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2017. Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural –a. In J. Emonds, and M. Janebova (eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure, 263–282. Olomouc: Palacky University Olomouc.
Manzini, M. R., and L. M. Savoia. 2018. The Morphosyntax of Albanian and Aromanian Varieties. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. (Crossref)
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., and B. Baldi. 2020. Microvariation and macrocategories: Differential Plural Marking and Phase theory. L’Italia Dialettale 81: 189–212.
Marantz, A. 2001. Words. WCCFL XX Handout, USC, February 2001
Marantz, A. 2007. Phases and Words. In S.-H. Choe (ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar, 191–222. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing Co.
Maiden, M. 2012. The Romance Verb. Morphomic Structure and Diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nyrop, K. 1903. Grammaire historique de la langue française. Copenhague: Det Nordiske Forlag.
Renzi, L., and L. Vanelli. 1983. I pronomi soggetto in alcune varietà romanze. In AA.VV., Scritti linguistici in onore di G.B. Pellegrini, 120–145. Pisa: Pacini.
Roberts, I. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. (Crossref)
Roberts, I. 2018. Object clitics for subject clitics in Francoprovençal and Piedmontese. In M. Grimaldi, R. Lai, L. Franco, and B. Baldi (eds.), Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond, 255–265. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Crossref)
Savoia, L. M., Baldi, B., and M. R. Manzini. 2019. Asymmetries in Plural Agreement in DPs. In J. Emonds, M. Janebová, and L. Veselovská (eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2018, 204–224. Olomouc: Palacký University Olomouc.
Savoia, L. M., Baldi, B., and M. R. Manzini. 2018. Sigmatic plurals in Romance varieties spoken in Italy and their interaction with -i plurals. LINGBAW 4: 141–160. (Crossref)
Thornton, A. 2005. Morfologia. Roma: Carocci.
Villanueva Svensson, M. 2021. The origin of the Indo-European simple thematic presents. The nominal connection. Indo-European Linguistics: 1–29. (Crossref)
Wood, J., and A. Marantz. 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco, and Á. J. Gallego (eds.), The Verbal Domain, 255–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
University of Florence
University of Florence https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-5629
