Frames and political choice in Scottish election campaigns
Éva Jakusné HarnosUniversity of Public Service, Budapest , Hungary
Mátyás Gergi-HorgosUniversity of Public Service, Budapest , Hungary
The paper presents interdisciplinary research using the framework of cognitive linguistics based metaphor theory and nationalism studies of political science. Frames of movement are placed under scrutiny during the discourse analysis of the 2016 and 2021 election manifestos of the Scottish National Party and social media posts. In relation to metaphors of movement, images describing the future of an independent Scotland are also detected. The authors attempt to analyse and interpret findings both from the perspective of cognitive linguistics and ethno-symbolism. Apart from the texts of the manifestos, the timeframe of the research involved social media posts two months preceding and two months following the elections in both cases. Methodology was issue-driven and computer assisted but supervised: key words linked to movement were extracted from the manifestos and clustered. Their occurrence and frequency in the social media posts was checked. In the qualitative analysis phase, messages of the manifestos and of the posts were contrasted in order to answer our research question what kind of persuasive political discourse was used when options for the citizens were outlined.
Keywords:discourse analysis, cognitive metaphor, nationalism, elections, Scotland
Aiton, A., Burnside, R., Campbell, A., Edwards, T., Liddell, G., McIver, I., and A. McQuillen. 2016. SPICe Briefing: Election 2016. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament. Available: https://archive2021.parliament.scot/ResearchBriefingsAndFactsheets/S5/SB_16-34_Election_2016.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2021).
Aiton, A., Atherton, S., Burnside, R., Campbell, A., Hudson, N., McIver, I., and Robinson, E. 2021. SPICe Briefing: Election 2021. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament. Available: https://sp-bpr-en-prod-cdnep.azureedge.net/published/2021/5/11/591dc3c7-d994-4bbd-8120-767e9e781a67/SB%2021-24.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2021).
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Bechhofer, F., and D. McCrone (eds.) 2009. National Identity, Nationalism and Constitutional Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234147
Benoit, W. L. 2017. The Functional Theory of Political Campaigns. In K. Kenski, and K. Hall Jamieson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, 196−204. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brass, Paul R. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Breuilly, J. 1993. Nationalism and The State. Manchaster: Manchaster University Press.
Breuilly, J. 1996. Approaches to Nationalism. In G. Balakrishnan (ed.) Mapping the Nation, 146–174. London: Verso.
Brown, G., and G. Yule. 1991. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carver, T., and P. Jernej (eds.) 2008. Political Language and Metaphor. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931233
Charteris-Black, J. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899
Druckman, J. N. 2010. Competing Frames in a Political Campaign. In B. F. Schaffner, and P. J. Sellers (eds.), Winning with Words. The Origins & Impact of Political Framing, 101−120. New York/London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
El Fekih Said, W. 2018. Reconstruction and Multiculturalism in the Scottish Nation-Building Project. Études écossaises, (20), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesecossaises.1418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesecossaises.1418
Franzosi, R. 2018. Content analysis. In R. Wodak, and B. Frochtner (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 153–168, London/New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-13
Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., and G. J. Steen (eds.) (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175
Gibbs, R. W. (ed.) 2008. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.002
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 2017. Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350
Gilman, L., and S. McKay. 2021. Scottish Government-Green Cooperation Agreement and other forms of political agreement. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament. Available: https://sp-bpr-en-prod-cdnep.azureedge.net/published/2021/9/29/951cd002-5c86-4f58-912d-09652cdc6cea/SB%2021-66.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2021).
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper and Row.
Halverson, S. L., and J. O. Engene. 2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study of Schengen and Maastricht. Metaphor and Symbol 25(1): 1–18, DOI: 10.1080/10926480903538456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480903538456
Handl, S., and H.-J. Schmid (eds.) 2011. Windows to the Mind. Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238198
Hobsbawm, E., and T. Ranger (eds.) 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, S. 2010. Framing Research. The Next Steps. In B. F. Schaffner, and P. J. Sellers (eds.), Winning with Words. The Origins & Impact of Political Framing, 185−191. New York/London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Keating, M., and J. McGarry. 2001. Minority nationalism and the changing international order. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242143.001.0001
Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kutter, A. 2018. Corpus analysis. In R. Wodak, and B. Frochtner (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 169–186. London/New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-14
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 202−251. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know What Liberals Don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Musolff, A. 2015. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, A. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
O’Leary, B. 2001. Instrumentalist Theories of Nationalism. In. A. S Leoussi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Nationalism, 148–153. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Özkirimli, U. 2010. Theories of Nationalism: a Critical Introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pragglejaz Group 2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1): 1−39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1
Rycker, A. D., and Z. M. Don (eds.) 2013 Discourse and Crisis. Critical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Schank, R.C., and R.P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Semino, E., and Zs. Demjén (eds.) 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London/New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953
Simpkins, F. 2017. The 2016 Scottish Parliament Elections: Unionist Parties and the Constitutional Divide. In Revue française de civilisation britannique 22: 4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.1576
Smith, A. D. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Smith, A. D. 2007. Epilogue: The Power of Ethnic Traditions in the Modern World In A. S. Leoussi, and S. Grosby (eds.), Nationalism and Ethnosymbolism. History, Culture and Ethnicity in the Formation of Nations, 325−336. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748629350-023
Smith, A. D. 2009. Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876558
Steen, G. 2007. Finding Metaphor in Discourse: Pragglejazz and Beyond. Culture, Language and Representation V: 9−25.
Stewart Leith, M., and D. Soule. 2011. Political Discourse and National Identity in Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637362.001.0001
UK Government 2021. Vaccinations in Scotland. Coronavirus.data.gov.uk. Available: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations (Accessed 10 October 2021).
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London/New York: Arnold.
What is hutting? Exploring the new Scottish lifestyle trend. n.d. Available: https://www.lovecampers.co.uk/blog/conscious-campers/what-is-hutting-exploring-the-scottish-lifestyle-trend/ (Accessed 30 January, 2022).
Wodak, R., and B. Frochtner (eds.) 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Ziem, A., and C. Schwerin. 2014. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Contributions to this journal are published under a Creative Commons license.