Domains of case changing and case maintaining movements
Mark NewsonEötvös Loránd University, Budapest , Hungary
Krisztina SzécsényiEötvös Loránd University, Budapest , Hungary
With recent developments in Case Theory, movements in which a DP acquires a different case to the one it would have received had it not moved have been accepted as a possibility. In this paper we examine a number of such movements from a variety of languages to attempt to characterise and understand them more fully. Based in Dependent Case Theory, our analysis claims that case change does not really happen, but case assignment is allowed to be delayed under certain circumstances creating the illusion of one case over-writing another. In explicating these circumstances, we are not only able to provide a better understanding of when ‘case change’ can and can’t happen, but also develop the theory in ways which address certain conceptual problems that it faces.
Keywords:Dependent Case Theory, domains, unmarked case, case change
Baker, M. 2015. Case: its principles and parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295186
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kornfilt, J. 2003. Scrambling, Subscrambling and Case in Turkish. In S. Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling, 125–155. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758403.ch6
Marantz, A. 1991. Case and Licensing. ESCOL 91: Proceedings of the eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 234–253. Columbus: Ohio State University.
Nakamura, H. 2002. Double subject, double nominative object and double accusative object constructions in Japanese and Korean. Language, Information and Computation 16: 358–369.
Newson. M and K. Szécsényi. 2020. Dative as the unmarked unmarked case in Hungarian. In M. Ziková, and M. Wągiel (eds.), Linguistica Brunensia 68(2): 27–44. Brno: Masaryk University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/LB2020-2-3
Ryu, Byond-Rae. 2014 Semantic constraints on multiple case marking in Korean. In D. Gerland, C. Horn, A. Latrouite, and A. Ortmann (eds.) Meaning and Grammar of Nouns and Verbs, 77–112. Berlin, Boston: Düsseldorf university press. doi: 10.1515/9783110720075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110720075-005
Szabolcsi, A. 1983. The Possessor that Ran Away from Home. The Linguistic Review 3(1): 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1918.104.22.168
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The Noun Phrase. In F. Kiefer, and K. É. Kiss. (eds.) The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian: Syntax and Semantics 27: 179–127. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373174_004
Woolford, E. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 111–130. doi: 10.1162/002438906775321175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Contributions to this journal are published under a Creative Commons license.