When must not is not forbidden
Abstract
The present paper describes an empirical investigation into an English modal predicate with the auxiliary verb must, the negative particle not and the bare infinitive of the main verb. Typically, the negator not changes the meaning of must from obligation or strong recommendation to forbiddance. This, however, takes place only with the root flavor of must. Epistemic must does not interact with not in this way. The study uses authentic language samples retrieved from the online version of The Corpus of Contemporary American English. The analysis adapts the model of the semantic field of modal expressions developed by Kratzer (1991), and it attempts to find what lies behind the said lack of interaction between must and not. After a scrutiny of the conversational backgrounds influencing the studied modal meanings, the study found that the meaning expressed by a speaker with must not depends on whether the speaker evaluates the propositional circumstances directly or infers from them. Moreover, the study proposes patterns of must-not interfaces with regard to the modal flavor.
Keywords:
modality, modality-negation interfaces, semantic field of modality, conversational backgrounds, possible worldsReferences
Abraham, W. 1997. The interdependence of case, aspect, and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the genitive. In A. van Kemenade, and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29—61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Abraham, W. 1999. On the syntax and semantics of modal verbs in German. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 43: 61—94.
Abraham, W. 2008. On the logic of generalizations about cross-linguistic aspect-modality links. In W. Abraham, and E. Leiss (eds.), Modality–aspect interfaces: Implications and typological solutions, 3–13. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Abraham, W. 2020. Modality in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139108676. (Crossref)
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and E. Finegan. 1999/2007. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and necessity: A study in semantics and modal logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davies, M. 2008-. The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.
De Haan, F. 1997. The interaction of modality and negation. A typological study. New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Eastwood, J. 2002. Oxford guide to English grammar. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenbaum, S. 1996. The Oxford English grammar. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hacquard, V. 2006. Aspects of modality. (Ph.D. dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/37421.
Hacquard, V. 2009. On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 279—312. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-009-9061-6. (Crossref)
Hacquard, V. 2010. On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18 (1): 79—114. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11050-010-9056-4. (Crossref)
Hacquard, V. 2011. Modality. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 1484—1515. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Hacquard, V. 2016. Modals: Meaning categories?. In J. Błaszczak, A. Giannakidou, D. Klimek-Jankowska, and K. Migdalski (eds.), Mood, aspect, modality revisited: New answers to old questions, 45—74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Crossref)
Hintikka, J. 1961. Modality and quantification. Theoria 27: 119–128. (Crossref)
Huddleston, R. D., and G. K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Iatridou, S., and H. Zeijlstra. 2013. Negation, polarity and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 529—568. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00138. (Crossref)
Johansson, S. 2013. Modals and semi-modals of obligation in American English: Some aspects of developments from 1990 until the present day (2013). In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech, and S. Wallis (eds), The verb phrase in English. Investigating recent language change with corpora, 372-380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Kotin, Michail L. 2012. Modalitäten. In G. Pawłowski, M. Olpińska-Szkiełko, and S. Bonacchi (eds.), Mensch – Sprachen – Kulturen: Beiträge und Materialien der internationalen wissenschaftlichen Jahrestagung des Verbandes Polnischer Germanisten 25.-27. Mai 2012, Warszawa, 140—158. Warszawa: Euro-Edukacja.
Kotin, Michail L. 2014. Modalitäten im Sprachkontrast: Nochmals zu der Aspektualität-Modalität-Schnittstelle. In K. Lukas, and I. (eds.), Deutsch im Kontakt und im Kontrast: Festschrift für Prof. Andrzej Kątny zum 65. Geburstag, 105—117. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kratzer, A. 1991. Modality. In A. von Stechow, and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639—650. Berlin: de Gruyter. (Crossref)
Kratzer, A. 2012. Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Kripke, S. A. 1963. Semantical analysis of Modal Logic I, Normal Propositional Calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9: 67–96. (Crossref)
Leiss, E. 2008. The silent and aspect-driven patterns of deonticity and epistemicity: A chapter in diachronic typology. In W. Abraham, and E. Leiss (eds.), Modality–aspect interfaces: Implications and typological solutions, 15–41. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Miestamo, M. 2007. Negation – An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00026.x. (Crossref)
Millar, N. 2009. Modal verbs in TIME: frequency changes 1923-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191-220. https://benjamins.com/catalog/ijcl.14.2.03mil. (Crossref)
Morante, R., and C. Sporleder. 2012. Modality and negation: An introduction to the special issue. Computational Linguistics 38 (2): 223–260. https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article/38/2/223/2142/Modality-and-Negation-An-Introduction-to-the. (Crossref)
Nuyts, J. 2006. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 1—26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Crossref)
Palmer, F. R. 2003. Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. In R. Facchinetti, M. G. Krug, and F. R. Palmer (eds.) Modality in contemporary English, 1—17. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. (Crossref)
Payne, T. E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Perzanowski, J. 2006. Ontyka modalności. In W. Strawiński, M. Grygianiec, and A. Brożek (eds.), Myśli o języku, nauce i wartościach, 281—297. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Portner, P. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Crossref)
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and J. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman Group Limited.
Radden, G. 2007. Interaction of modality with negation. In W. Chłopicki, A. Pawelec, and A. Pokojska, (eds.), Cognition in language. Volume in honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska, 224–254. Kraków: Tertium.
Swan, M. 2002. Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szymański, L. 2016. Towards a transboundary approach to the analysis of linguistic modality – Elements of an empirical investigation of the modal auxiliary must in contemporary American English. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 71: 211—230.
Szymański, L. 2017. An empirical investigation of the allegedly non-normative modal predicate with must, not, and the perfect infinitive of the main verb. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 73: 247—258.
Szymański, L. 2019. Modal auxiliaries and aspect in contemporary American English – A corpus-based study. Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
Szymański, L. 2021. A corpus-based analysis of the modal can with theperfect in American English from a synchronic anddiachronic perspective. Studia Neophilologica 93 (3): 287—313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2020.1846613. (Crossref)
Szymański, L. 2022. The Furdalian concept of 'open linguistics' exemplified with an investigation into the semantic field of English possibility modals. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 78: 237—258. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.2022 (Crossref)
Tottie, G. 1991. Negation in English speech and writing. San Diego, New York, London: Academic Press.
Williams, C. 2009. Legal English and the 'modal revolution'. In R. Salkie, P. Basuttil, and J. van der Auwera (eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description, 199—210. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Crossref)
University of Zielona Góra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-3615
