Where authority, speech acts and modality meet: A pragmatic analysis of the trial record of King Charles I
Minako Nakayasu
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Japanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-213X
Michi Shiina
Hosei University , Japanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-2613
Abstract
This paper investigates how speakers perform speech acts coordinating with modality in the flux of power in Early Modern courtroom interactions along the lines of historical pragmatics. The text used for analysis is the trial record of King Charles I in the Sociopragmatic corpus, in which the King was put on trial on the charge of high treason.
First, examination of vocatives, noun phrases, verb phrases and grammatical subjects shows who has the authoritative power in interaction, the Lord President (the judge) or the King (the defendant). Next, quantitative and qualitative analyses of speech acts performed with the aid of modals demonstrate the tendency that the speech acts performed by the Lord President are highly relevant to deontic modality, while those performed by the King are closely related to dynamic modality. This reflects which authority the two parties depend upon: authority of the Court, and authority of the King/Kingdom, respectively.
The analysis of authority, speech acts and modality reveals that the King becomes less authoritative as the trial proceeds, particularly after the sentence has been pronounced. On the other hand, the authority of the Court, which is manifested in the Lord President’s speech, stays the same throughout the course of the trial.
To summarise, this research shows how the judge and the defendant interacted with each other in a fluctuating power relationship in the courtroom, at the interfaces between authority, speech acts and modality, where their viewpoints and attitudes are reflected.
Keywords:
authority, speech acts, modality, trial record, historical pragmaticsReferences
Archer, D. 2005. Questions and answers in the English courtroom (1640-1760). John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Archer, D., and J. Culpeper. 2003. Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, and T. McEnery (eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Peter Lang.
Culpeper, J., and D. Archer. 2008. Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640-1760. In A. H. Jucker, and I. Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English, 45–84. John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Jacobs, A., and A. H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In A. H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics, 3–33. John Benjamins. (Crossref)
Jeffries, L. 2010. Critical stylistics: The power of English. Palgrave Macmillan. (Crossref)
Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 2006. Historical courtroom discourse: Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7(2), 163–179. (Crossref)
Nakayasu, M. 2009. The pragmatics of modals in Shakespeare. Peter Lang.
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Crossref)
Shiina, M. 2014. Shoki kindai eigoki no hōteigengo no tokuchō: ‘Torishirabe’ ni okeru ‘yobikakego’ no shiyō to kinō [Characteristics of courtroom language in the Early Modern English period: Pragmatic functions of vocatives in trial texts]. In S. Kinsui, H. Takada, and M. Shiina (eds.), Rekishi goyōron no sekai: Bunpōka, taigūhyōgen, hatsuwakōi [Horizons of historical pragmatics: Grammaticalization, politeness and speech act], 77–104. Hituzi syobō.
Shiina, M. 2016 (July 27–30). Authority and speech acts in courtroom interaction: Trial of King Charles I [Paper presentation]. PALA 2016 (Poetic and Linguistics Association Annual Conference), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Shiina, M., and M. Nakayasu. 2022. Strategies of power and distance in the trial record of King Charles I: Combinations of personal pronouns and modality in speech acts. In Y. Iyeiri, H. Yadomi, D. Selfe, and J. Smith (eds.), Variational studies on pronominal forms in the history of English, 63–89. Kaitakusha.
Taavitsainen, I., and M. Jucker. 2010. Trends and developments in historical pragmatics. In A. H. Jucker, and I. Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 3–30. De Gruyter Mouton. (Crossref)
Taavitsainen, I., and A. H. Jucker. 2015. Twenty years of historical pragmatics: Origins, developments and changing thought styles. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 1–24. (Crossref)
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-213X
