Partitive and Counting Phrases in Polish: A Nanosyntactic Analysis of Syncretism
Abstract
This paper investigates syncretism in Polish pseudo-partitive and counting phrases, where different forms of the same noun appear in context as ‘a piece of apple’, ‘two apples’, and ‘five apples’. These contexts exhibit three distinct syncretism patterns: AAB, ABC, and ABA, depending on whether suffixes are repeated or differ across forms. The analysis focuses on how suffixes signal distinctions in number and countability, drawing on the nanosyntactic framework. By applying the Lexicalization Algorithm, the paper shows how noun structures grow incrementally and how suffixes compete for lexicalization. Special attention is paid to the ABA pattern in feminine nouns, where the same suffix appears in the genitive singular and genitive plural, but not in the nominative plural – a configuration rarely attested cross-linguistically. The findings provide evidence for fine-grained syntactic structure and illustrate how syncretism patterns reflect the underlying functional sequence.
Keywords:
pseudo-partitives, counting, nanosyntax, syncretism, *ABAReferences
Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53(2): 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0043.
Bielec, D. 1998. Polish: An essential grammar. London/New York: Routledge.
Blix, H. 2021. Phrasal spellout and partial overwrite: On an alternative to backtracking. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1614.
Bobaljik, J. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Borer, H. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bultnick, B. 2005. Numerous meanings: The meaning of English cardinals and the legacy of Paul Grice. Antwerp: Antwerp University Association.
Caha, P. 2009. Nanosyntax of case [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø].
Caha, P. 2022. The marking of mass, count, and plural denotations in multi-dimensional paradigms. Studia Linguistica 76: 212–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12183.
Caha, P., K. De Clercq, M. Starke, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd. 2023. Nanosyntax: State of the art and recent developments. In P. Caha, K. De Clercq, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd (eds.), Nanosyntax and the Lexicalization Algorithm (forthcoming). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007744.
Cinque, G., and L. Rizzi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. In V. Moscati (ed.), CisCL working papers on language and cognition 2: 43–59. Siena: University of Siena, distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Corbett, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, G. 1993. The head of Russian numeral expressions. In G. Corbett, N. Fraser, and M. Scott (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 11–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cortiula, M. 2023. The nanosyntax of Friulian verbs: An analysis of the present and past in Tualis Friulian. [Doctoral dissertation, Masaryk University, Brno].
Falco, M., and R. Zamparelli. 2019. Pseudo-partitives and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 1–49.
Franks, S. 1994. Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12: 597–674.
Franks, S. 1995. Quantified structures: Russian versus Serbo-Croatian. In Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, 93–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harbour, D. 2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90(1): 185–229.
Jakobson, R. 1984. Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies, 1931-1981 (L. Waugh and M. Halle, eds.). Berlin: Mouton Publishers.
Janků, L. 2022. The nanosyntax of Czech nominal declension [Doctoral dissertation, Masaryk University].
Janků, L., and M. Starke. 2019. Gender meets nano. [Accessed: 2024-12-12]. https://michal.starke.ch/talks/nanolab/#talkTitle.
Kayne, R. S. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, P. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Krifka, M. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. https://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/.
Middleton, H. J. 2020. ABA syncretism patterns in pronominal morphology [Doctoral dissertation, University College London].
Nesset, T. 2019. Big data in Russian linguistics? Another look at paucal constructions. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 64(2): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2019-0012.
Pesetsky, D. 2013. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rothstein, S. 2010. Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343–397.
Rothstein, S. 2017. Semantics for counting and measuring [Accessed via user-provided file]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511734830.
Scheer, T. 2012. Variation is in the lexicon: Yer-based and epenthetic vowel-zero alternations in Polish. In E. Cyran and H. Kardela (eds.), Sound, structure and sense: Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann, 631–672.
Starke, M. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. In P. Svenonius, G. Ramchand, M. Starke, and T. Taraldsen (eds.), Nordlyd 36: Special issue on Nanosyntax, 1–6.
Starke, M. 2018. Complex left branches, spell-out, and prefixes. In P. Caha, K. De Clercq, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd (eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax, 239–249. Oxford: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax.
Žoha, L. 2025a. Partitives, countability, and syncretism in Czech morphosyntax. Paper presented at the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium (Olinco), Olomouc, Czech Republic. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/zohalukas/research?authuser=0.
Žoha, L. 2025b. Nanosyntactic explanation of syncretism in Polish pseudo-partitive and counting contexts. Paper presented at the SlavLingColl 2025. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/zohalukas/research.
