Polish Modal Ellipsis
Abstract
Over the past years, Modal Ellipsis (ME) has been the focus of some cross-linguistic investigations in languages such as Spanish (Dagnac 2010, Fernández-Sánchez 2023), Dutch (Aelbrecht 2010), French (Authier 2011), and Czech (Gruet-Skrabalova 2017), among others. Initially, it was considered to involve a null proform – a silent pronominal element standing in for the missing complement (Brucart 1999, Depiante 2000). More recent analyses, however, argue that this elliptical construction should be analysed as PF-deletion. According to this approach, the ellipsis site has a full syntactic structure deleted at Phonetic Form. In this paper, I propose that Polish ME follows the PF-deletion pattern, specifically targeting the complement of VoiceP. To test this hypothesis, I examine three diagnostics – extraction, case connectivity effects, and syntactic mismatches. The data reveal that Polish ME allows extraction and exhibits case-matching effects between the remnant and the elided structure. These findings provide compelling evidence that Polish ME involves an underlying syntactic structure deleted at PF.
Keywords:
ellipsis, modal verbs, Polish, PF-deletionReferences
Aelbrecht, L. 2010. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Authier, M. 2011. A movement analysis of French modal ellipsis. Probus 23: 175–216.
Bondaruk, A. 2015. A comparison of the modal dać się structure with the dispositional middle in Polish. Linguistics Beyond and Within 1: 43–63.
Bresnan, J. 1971. Note on the notion ‘identity of sense anaphora’. Linguistic Inquiry 2/4: 589–597.
Brucart, J. M. 1999. La elipsis. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 2787–2866. Madrid: Espasa.
Dagnac, A. 2010. Modal ellipsis in French, Spanish and Italian: Evidence for a TP-deletion analysis. In K. Arregi, Z. Fagyal, S. Montrul, and A. Tremblay (eds.), Romance linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance, 157–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Depiante, M. A. 2000. The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping/bare argument ellipsis. Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut.
Depiante, M. A. 2001. On null complement anaphora in Spanish and Italian. Probus 13/2: 193–221.
Depiante, M. A. 2019. Null complement anaphora. In J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 657–680. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drubig, H. B. 2001. On the syntactic form of epistemic modality. Ph.D. diss., University of Tübingen.
Fernández-Sánchez, J. 2023. Spanish modal ellipsis is not null complement anaphora. Linguistics 61/4: 885–913.
Fiengo, R., and R. May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grinder, J., and P. M. Postal. 1971. Missing antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 269–312.
Gruet-Skrabalova, H. 2017. Czech modal complement ellipsis from a comparative perspective. In F. Marušič, P. Mišmaš, and R. Žaucer (eds.), Advances in formal Slavic linguistics, 97–122. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Hankamer, J. 1979. Deletion in coordinate structures. New York: Garland Publishing.
Hankamer, J., and I. Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7/3: 391–428.
Hardt, D. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Jędrzejowski, Ł. 2015. On tensed modals in Polish. Michigan Slavic Publications FASL 23: 122–142.
Kaleta, A. 2020. Conceptualizing modality: A case study of Polish modal verbs. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Cultural conceptualizations in language and communication, 275–292. Cham: Springer.
Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
McDowell, J. 1987. Assertion and modality. Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Merchant, J. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. 2013a. Diagnosing ellipsis. In L. L.-S. Cheng and N. Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, 537–542. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. 2013b. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44/1: 77–108.
Milczarski, W. 2021. Grammatical aspect in Polish and the perception of event duration. Beiträge zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft 10: 71–96.
Miller, P. H., B. Hemforth, P. Amsili, and G. Flambard. 2020. Missing antecedents found. Linguistic Society of America 822–834.
Ruda, M. 2014. The impersonal subject -N/T construction in Polish and the typology of Voice heads. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9: 203–243.
Sag, I. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. diss., MIT.
Witkoś, J. 1996. On NegP and the structure of the Polish clause. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 31: 65–96.
Zabrocki, T. 1979. Status syntaktyczny czasowników modalnych w języku angielskim i polskim. Próba konfrontacji. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego (PTJ) 36: 43–57.
Zagona, K. 2008. Phasing in modals: Phasing and the epistemic/root distinction. In J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (eds.), Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 75, 273–291. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ziat, M. 2018. Null complement anaphora and null object in Hebrew. Master’s thesis, Tel-Aviv University.
University of Gdańsk https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6869-6646
