The Teacher and the Frog: Unveiling the Morphosyntax of Gender Shifts in Czech with Nanosyntax
Abstract
This study examines the formation of nouns in Czech that show grammatical gender through stem morphemes and three productive suffixes: -a, -k-(a), and -ák. These suffixes are the main morphological exponents across three noun classes – monomorphemic (e.g. kmotr/kmotr-a), bimorphemic (učitel/učitel-k-a), and stem–suffix compounds (žáb-a/žab-ák). Using nanosyntax, the study shows that gender alternations arise from hierarchical syntactic structures rather than lexical or semantic defaults.
By investigating noun pairs such as učitel (‘teacher.Masc’) / učitel-k-a (‘teacher.Fem’) and žáb-a (‘frog.FEM’) / žab-ák (‘frog.MASC’), the study shows that masculine forms contain Class and Masc, while feminine forms emerge through the addition of Fem. Suffixes such as -k-a and -ák function as lexicalization solutions, structured through movement-based operations.
This approach refines our understanding of Czech gender morphology, demonstrating that nanosyntax captures gender alternations systematically even when surface forms are unpredictable. By modeling these alternations within a unified syntactic framework, the study provides a principled account of morphological derivation and paves the way for further cross-linguistic extensions.
Keywords:
Czech noun morphology, gender alternation, nanosyntaxReferences
Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Baggio, P. 2022. Getting rid of MASC: The encoding of gender in Italian. LingBuzz. August 2022. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006753.
Blix, H. 2022. Interface legibility and nominal classification: A nanosyntactic account of Kipsigis singulatives. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 7. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5825.
Bobaljik, J. D., and C. Levart Zocca. 2011. Gender markedness: The anatomy of a counter-example. Morphology 21(2): 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9156-3.
Caha, P., K. De Clercq, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd. 2019. The fine structure of the comparative. Studia Linguistica 73(3): 470–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12107.
Caha, P. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Ph.D. diss., University of Tromsø. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/2203/thesis.pdf.
Caha, P., and L. Taraldsen Medová. 2022. On the feminine singular declension of the Russian demonstrative. https://www.muni.cz/vyzkum/publikace/2222757.
Corbett, G. G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119.
Cortiula, M. 2023. The nanosyntax of Friulian verbs. LingBuzz. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007617.
De Clercq, K., P. Caha, M. Starke, and G. Vanden Wyngaerd. 2025. Nanosyntax: State of the art and recent developments. In Nanosyntax and the lexicalization algorithm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007744.
Dokulil, M. 1986. Tvoření slov. In Mluvnice češtiny, vol. 1. Praha: Academia.
Fiebig, N. 2023. Asserted and presupposed gender on animal nouns. Paper presented at NELS 53, Göttingen, January 12, 2023. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XDufsIvnqfg6qjzdE3fNwin9TX6B-Nos/view.
Halle, M., and A. Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, H., and R. Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International 4(4): 3–9.
Harley, H., and E. Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/24/article/19419.
Jakobson, R. 1984. Structure of the Russian verb. In M. Halle and L. R. Waugh (eds.), Russian and Slavic grammar, 1–14. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822885.1.
Janků, L. 2022. The nanosyntax of Czech nominal declensions. Ph.D. diss., LingBuzz. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006705.
Jurafsky, D. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3): 533–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/416278.
Kasenov, D. 2023. Pseudo-ABA patterns and the generative power of nanosyntax. LingBuzz. September 2023. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007590.
Kramer, R. 2015. The morphosyntax of gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679935.001.0001.
Scheer, T. 2005. Slavic vowel-zero alternations and government phonology: Two approaches, one solution. In S. Franks, F. Y. Gladney, and M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The South Carolina Meeting, 13: 300–311. Michigan Slavic Materials 50. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. http://tscheer.free.fr/papers/Scheer_05_Slavic_v-zero&GP_FASL13.pdf.
Spathas, G., and Y. Sudo. 2020. Gender on animal nouns in Greek. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 19: 25. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.297.
Starke, M. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.213.
Starke, M. 2018. Complex left branches, spellout, and prefixes. In L. Baunaz, L. Haegeman, K. De Clercq, and E. Lander (eds.), Exploring nanosyntax, 239–249. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.003.0009.
Štícha, F. (ed.). 2018. Velká akademická gramatika spisovné češtiny. Vol. 1. Praha: Academia.
