Metaphoric Sense Developments in the Names of Places of Worship in Contemporary American English
Sylwester Łodej
Jan Kochanowski University , PolandJohn G. Newman
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley , United Stateshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8112-6566
Abstract
This paper offers an account of the metaphorical extension of the names of religious houses of worship such as temple, church, mosque, and synagogue in contemporary American English, reflecting processes of linguistic secularization. Using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), the study investigates how the meanings of religious terms enter into secular domains, signalling shifts in societal perceptions of religious experience. The findings show that temple and church frequently undergo metaphorization, appearing in phrases like temple of learning and church of football, where non-religious modifiers drive semantic extension. These terms increasingly denote secular places characterized by human passion, knowledge, and community, disclosing broader patterns of cultural engagement that evidently mirror religious practices and behaviours. In contrast, mosque and synagogue demonstrate greater resistance to metaphorical extension, retaining religious denotations more typically. The study identifies SOCIETY, CULTURE, and LIFESTYLE as the principal domains for metaphorical extension, suggesting an alignment between linguistic secularization and usage shifts into non-religious contexts. Conversely, domains such as SPORT, TECHNOLOGY, and MILITARY show minimal metaphorical usage, reflecting the selective nature of this process. The results underscore the role of metaphor in bridging sacred and secular spheres, demonstrating how language adapts in order to reflect evolving cultural frameworks. By applying Conceptual Metaphor Theory and insights from cultural linguistics, this research advances our understanding of linguistic metaphorization, and more particularly secularization, as significant drivers of semantic change.
Keywords:
secularization, metaphor, semantics, corpus, cultureReferences
Berger, P. L. 1999. The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Berger, P. L. 2002. Secularization and de-secularization. In L. Woodhead et al. (eds.), Religions in the modern world, 336–344. London: Routledge.
Blank, A. 1999. Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In A. Blank and P. Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition, 61–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boroditsky, L. 2011. How language shapes thought. Scientific American 304(2): 62–65.
Bruce, S. 1996. Religion in the modern world: From cathedrals to cults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bruce, S. 2011. Secularization: In defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Casanova, J. 1994. Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casanova, J. 2006. Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. Hedgehog Review 8: 7–22.
Chadwick, O. 1975. The secularization of the European mind in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davie, G. 2007. The sociology of religion: A critical agenda. London: SAGE Publications.
de Graaf, N. D. 2013. Secularization: Theoretical controversies generating empirical research. In R. Wittek, T. A. B. Snijders, and V. Nee (eds.), Handbook of rational choice research, 321–354. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Americanization, globalization, and secularization: Understanding the convergence of media systems and political communication. In W. L. Bennett and R. M. Entman (eds.), Communication, society, and politics, 25–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Online (2009).
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kövecses, Z. 2009. Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressure of coherence. In A. Musolff and J. Zinken (eds.), Metaphor and discourse, 11–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kövecses, Z. 2020. An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1): 112–130.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I, theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963 [1958]. Structural anthropology (C. Jacobson and B. G. Schoepf, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Lucy, J. A. 1992. Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Łodej, S., and J. G. Newman. 2014. Secular semasiology of the adjective divine in Late Modern American English. International Journal of Language and Culture 1(1): 60–74.
McLeod, H. 2000. Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848–1914. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meillet, A. 1906. Comment les mots changent de sens. Paris: Hachette.
Moore, R. L. 1989. Religion, secularization, and the shaping of culture industry in antebellum America. American Quarterly 41(2): 216–242.
Newman, J. G., and S. Łodej. 2014. From less irreverence to less reverence: Semantic and pragmatic change in the adjective holy in American English. In Y. Iyeiri and J. Smith (eds.), From texts to corpora: studies in Middle and Modern English, 133–151. Osaka: Osaka Books.
Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, G. B. 1996. Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Parsons, T. 1974. Religion in postindustrial America: The problem of secularization. Social Research 41(2): 193–225.
Rabin, C. 1965. Secularization trends in Hebrew and parallels in English religious terminology. Hebrew Linguistic Review 12(3): 89–104.
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sapir, E. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Sharifian, F. 2017. Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Smith, C. 2003. The secular revolution: Power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stern, G. 1931. Meaning and change of meaning: With special reference to the English language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics (vols. 1, 2). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, E. C., and R. B. Dasher. 2001. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ullmann, S. 1957. The principles of semantics. Glasgow: Jackson, Son and Company.
Van der Tol, M., and P. Gorski. 2022. Secularization as the fragmentation of the sacred and of sacred space. Religion, State and Society 50(5): 495–512.
Voas, D., and M. Chaves. 2016. Is the United States a counterexample to the secularization thesis? American Journal of Sociology 121(5): 1517–1556.
Whorf, B. L. 1940. Science and linguistics. MIT Technology Review 42(6): 229–231. Reprinted in J. B. Carroll (ed.). 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, 212–214. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yadin, A., and G. A. Zuckermann. 2010. Blorít—Pagans’ Mohawk or Sabras’ Forelock? Ideological secularization of Hebrew terms in Socialist Zionist Israeli. In T. Omoniyi (ed.), The sociology of language and religion: Change, conflict and accommodation, 84–125. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
