Evolution in the Use of Evolution? An Overview of the Term in the Corpus of Historical American English
Abstract
While synchronous analyses of the interaction between language and society abound, e.g., in discourse studies, diachronic corpus-based studies are rare. This paper attempts to fill that gap with an investigation into the frequency and collocational preferences of evolution in COHA: The Corpus of Historical American English (Davies 2010). This lexeme was chosen for two reasons. First, the acceptance and teaching of biological evolution, especially in public schools, have been points of contention in American culture for 100, if not 150, years, comprising one of America’s “culture wars.” Hence, the topic is of contemporary as well as historical discourse interest. Second, a pattern between the frequency of evolution and the popularity of the theory in American history was noted by Barczewska (2017). This suggests a link between the use of the lexeme and the theory’s reception. The current analysis investigates the frequency of evolution in COHA as a whole and according to genre. Collocational preferences within the corpus reveal changes in the way evolution is used over time. The paper also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of using COHA for similar research projects and suggests that the process applied here could be used to study the verbalization of other culture-shaping phenomena.
Keywords:
corpus linguistics, COHA, evolution, cultural-linguistic analysisReferences
Barczewska, S. 2017. Conceptualizing evolution education: A corpus-based analysis of US press discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Behe, M. J. 2007. The edge of evolution: The search for the limits of Darwinism. New York: Free Press.
Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. 2025. HarperCollins Publishers. Available online at https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-word/doctrine, checked on 28 February 2025.
Davies, M. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/.
DeWolf, D. K., J. G. West, C. Luskin, and J. Witt. 2006. Traipsing into evolution: Intelligent design and the Kitzmiller v. Dover decision. Seattle: Center for Science and Culture, Discovery Institute.
Forrest, B., and P. R. Gross. 2004/2007. Creationism’s Trojan horse: The wedge of intelligent design. New York: Oxford University Press.
Friginal, E., M. Walker, and J. B. Randall. 2022. Exploring mega-corpora: Google Ngram Viewer and the Corpus of Historical American English. E-JournALL 1(1): 48–68.
Hunter, G. W. 1914. A civic biology: Presented in problems. New York: American Book Company.
Hunter, G. W. 1926. New civic biology: Presented in problems. New York: American Book Company.
Hunter, J. D. 1991. Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
Jucker, A. H. 2018. Apologies in the history of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Corpus Pragmatics 2(4): 375–398.
Kippenhahn, R., and A. Weigert. 1990. Stellar structure and evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Larson, E. J. 2003. Trial and error: The American controversy over creation and evolution. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larson, E. J. 2006. Evolution: The remarkable history of a scientific theory. Modern Library Chronicles. New York: Modern Library.
Ng, R., H. G. Allore, M. Trentalange, J. K. Monin, and B. R. Levy. 2015. Increasing negativity of age stereotypes across 200 years: Evidence from a database of 400 million words. PLOS One 10(2): e0117086.
Pechenick, E. A., C. M. Danforth, and P. S. Dodds. 2015. Characterizing the Google Books Corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLOS One 10(10): e0137041.
Person, K. 2019. What defines a parent? BA thesis, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.
Steen, G. J., E. Biernacka, A. G. Dorst, A. Kaal, C. I. López Rodríguez, and T. Pasma. 2010. Pragglejaz in practice. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, and L. Cameron (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world, 165–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Webster, N. 1828. American dictionary of the English language. Available online at https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/doctrine, checked on 28 February 2025.
Whitcomb, J. C., and H. M. Morris. 1961. The Genesis Flood: The biblical record and its scientific implications. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co.
White, A. D. 1896/1993. A history of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom. Two volumes in one. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Jan Kochanowski University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-7025
