The Interconnection between Perspective-Taking Process and World-Creating Predicates in Language Use
Abstract
Perspective-taking (PT) is a fundamental cognitive faculty that enables individuals to understand and engage with others’ viewpoints. This paper focuses on overt linguistic items that directly signal perspectival shifts. Central to this investigation are world-creating predicates, such as verbs of cognition (e.g., think, believe) and utterance (e.g., say, tell), which contribute to the construction of perspectivity in language. Drawing on attributional semantics, this study argues that these predicates differ in their relation to PT: while predicates of utterance merely express another’s perspective, predicates of cognition more actively require the speaker to adopt that perspective. Through contextual analysis, the paper demonstrates how these predicates operate along a private-public domain continuum, with implications for identifying actual PT occurrences in discourse. Ultimately, it has been demonstrated that predicates establish perspectivity in two distinct ways, depending on their degree of egocentricity. For example, predicates of cognition (think, believe) belong to the private domain and lead to actual occurrences of PT, as they compel the speaker to adopt another’s perspective — to “put themselves in someone else’s shoes”. In contrast, predicates of utterance (say, tell) belong to the public domain and indicate merely the linguistic expression of a perspective without requiring the speaker to adopt it. In other words, these predicates simply attribute verbally expressed content to an “I” distinct from the speaker. Additionally, a five-level partial ordering has been proposed to capture gradations between the extremes of the private-public domain.
Keywords:
perspective-taking, world-creating predicates, attributional semanticsReferences
Alberti, G., and J. Kleiber. 2012. Where are possible worlds? Arguments for ReALIS. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59: 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.59.2012.1-2.1.
Alberti, G., and J. Kleiber. 2014. ReALIS: Discourse representation with a radically new ontology. In L. Veselovska and M. Janebova (eds.), Complex visibles out there, 4: 513–528. Olomouc: Palacký University.
Alberti, G., J. Kleiber, Z. Schnell, and V. Szabó. 2016. Intensional profiles and different kinds of human minds: “Case studies” about Hungarian imperative-like sentence types. Linguistics Beyond and Within 2: 6–26.
Apperly, I. 2012. Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of ‘Theory of mind’. 1st paperback ed. Psychology Press.
Arthur, L. Palacas. 1993. Attribution semantics: Linguistic worlds and point of view. Discourse Processes 16(3): 239–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544840.
Brentari, D., G. N. Larson, and L. A. MacLeod. 1992. The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley. J. Benjamins.
Brown, B. T., G. Morris, R. E. Nida, and L. Baker-Ward. 2012. Brief Report: Making experience personal: Internal states language in the memory narratives of children with and without Asperger’s disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42(3): 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1246-5.
Capps, L., M. Losh, and C. Thurber. 2000. “The frog ate the bug and made his mouth sad”: Narrative competence in children with autism. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 28(2): 193–204.
Carpendale, J. I., and C. Lewis. 2006. How children develop social understanding. Malden, UK: Blackwell.
Dancygier, B., and E. Sweetser, eds. 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Ö. 1997. Egocentricity in discourse and syntax. http://www.ling.su.se/staff/oesten/egocentric.
Deonna, J. A., and B. Nanay. 2014. Simulation versus theory-theory: A plea for an epistemological turn. In A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, values, and metaphysics, 299–311. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_20.
Djikic, M., K. Oatley, and M. C. Moldoveanu. 2013. Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 3(1): 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji.
Dodd, J. L., A. Ocampo, and K. S. Kennedy. 2011. Perspective taking through narratives: An intervention for students with ASD. Communication Disorders Quarterly 33(1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740110395014.
Duan, C. 2000. Being empathic: The role of motivation to empathize and the nature of target emotions. Motivation and Emotion 24(1): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005587525609.
Frith, C. D., and U. Frith. 2006. The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4): 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001.
Geelhand, P., F. Papastamou, G. Deliens, and M. Kissine. 2020. Narrative production in autistic adults: A systematic analysis of the microstructure, macrostructure, and internal state language. Journal of Pragmatics 164: 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.014.
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003.
Kleiber, J., G. Alberti, and V. Szabó. 2016. The intensional profiles of five Hungarian imperative sentence types. Linguistica 56: 161–172.
Liu, M. 2024. Mental simulation and language comprehension: The case of copredication. Mind & Language 39(1): 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12459.
Lu, W., and A. Verhagen. 2016. Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In B. Dancygier, W. Lu, and A. Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 169–190. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-008.
Montoya-Rodríguez, M. M., and F. J. Molina-Cobos. 2019. Training perspective taking skills in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A functional approach. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 14: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.08.003.
Neitzel, I., and M. Penke. 2021. Perspective taking in narrations of individuals with Down syndrome. Frontiers in Communication 6: 629757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.629757.
Ronfard, S., and P. L. Harris. 2014. When will Little Red Riding Hood become scared? Children’s attribution of mental states to a story character. Developmental Psychology 50(1): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032970.
Rossnagel, C. 2000. Cognitive load and perspective-taking: Applying the automatic-controlled distinction to verbal communication. European Journal of Social Psychology 30(3): 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<429::AID-EJSP3>3.0.CO;2-V.
Rzhevskaya, A. A. 2014. Linguistic means of building perspective in the discourse of conflict: Based on English drama. PhD diss., Moscow State Linguistic University.
Sanders, J., and W. Spooren. 1997. Perspective, subjectivity, and modality from a cognitive linguistic point of view. In W.-A. Fiebert, G. Redecker, and L. Waugh (eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics, 85–112. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Shinzato, R. 2004. Some observations concerning mental verbs and speech act verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 861–882.
Stirling, L., S. Douglas, S. Leekam, and L. Carey. 2014. The use of narrative in studying communication in autism spectrum disorders: A review of methodologies and findings. In J. Arciuli and J. Brock (eds.), Trends in language acquisition research (Vol. 11), 171–216. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schwarzkopf, S., H. Weldle, D. Müller-Feldmeth, and L. Konieczny. 2011. Mental simulation of spatial perspective during sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Tager-Flusberg, H. 1992. Autistic children’s talk about psychological states: Deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development 63(1): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130910.
Tager-Flusberg, H., and K. Sullivan. 1995. Attributing mental states to story characters: A comparison of narratives produced by autistic and mentally retarded individuals. Applied Psycholinguistics 16(3): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007281.
Villatte, M., J. L. Monestès, L. McHugh, E. Freixa i Baqué, and G. Loas. 2010. Adopting the perspective of another in belief attribution: Contribution of relational frame theory to the understanding of impairments in schizophrenia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 41(2): 125–134.
Vogels, J., S. Zeman, C. Contemori, P. Hendriks, F. Köder, and E. Maier. 2023. Editorial: Perspective taking in language. Frontiers in Communication 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1160727.
Waytz, A., and J. P. Mitchell. 2011. Two mechanisms for simulating other minds: Dissociations between mirroring and self-projection. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(3): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409007.
Wilson, W. 1984. James D. McCawley. Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic, but were ashamed to ask. Journal of Symbolic Logic 49(4): 1407–1408. https://doi.org/10.2307/2274290.
Zhang, X., H. H. Fung, J. T. Stanley, D. M. Isaacowitz, and M. Y. Ho. 2013. Perspective taking in older age revisited: A motivational perspective. Developmental Psychology 49(10): 1848–1858. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0031211.
