Teaching Language-Specific Preferences in the Native Language: An Interactive Web App for Prospective Teachers
Renate Delucchi Danhier
TU Dortmund University , Germanyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-815X
Paula González Ávalos
appliedAI Institute for Europe , GermanyAbstract
Natural languages offer diverse means for conveying the same idea, with each language typically exhibiting a predominant way of selecting and packaging information, referred to as a language-specific preference. Cross-linguistic research on motion events has shown that native speakers tend to favor such patterns and intuitively recognize non-preferred lexicalizations, particularly in the domain of motion event description. Due to subtle differences in grammar and vocabulary, these preferences are language-specific.
Acquiring the language-specific preferences of a second or foreign language poses a challenge even for advanced learners, especially when these preferences diverge from those internalized in the native language. Language teachers, however, are often unaware of both the existence of such preferences and the difficulties they pose for learners. This study therefore aims (1) to enable prospective teachers to discover language-specific preferences through a bottom-up, data-driven approach, and (2) to raise awareness of the challenges involved in acquiring them.
Accordingly, the online application LexiGraph was developed to enable prospective German teachers to identify patterns in linguistic data. Using an interactive dataset, students explored the expression of motion events across languages and speaker groups. The app supports visual exploration and provides a threshold learning experience that fosters an engaging and intellectually challenging learning environment by encoding complex semantic and syntactic information.
Student feedback highlights the novelty of the technological approach, although some participants perceived the material as cognitively demanding. Developing an understanding of language-specific lexicalization patterns can support prospective teachers in working with language learners and contribute to more inclusive multilingual education.
Keywords:
teacher training, motion event construal, web application, language awareness competence, digital humanitiesReferences
Alghamdi, A., M. Daller, and J. Milton. 2019. The persistence of L1 patterns in SLA: The boundary crossing constraint and incidental learning. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16: 81–106.
Antonijević, S., and S. Berthaud. 2009. Verbs of motion and sentence production in second language. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (Fechner Day), Galway, Ireland, 487–492.
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham, and R. Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Athanasopoulos, P., and E. Bylund. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309.
Athanasopoulos, P., L. Damjanovic, J. Burnand, and E. Bylund. 2015. Learning to think in a second language: Effects of proficiency and length of exposure in English learners of German. Modern Language Journal 99(1): 138–153.
Attwood, A. 2014. The teachability of entering and exiting in L2 English. Language Studies Working Papers 6: 43–52. University of Reading.
Beare, K. 2015. Visual explanations of each English tense. Available online at https://www.thoughtco.com/english-grammar-tenses-chart-4123178, accessed 22 December 2025.
Beavers, J., B. Levin, and S. W. Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2): 331–377.
Bepperling, S., and H. Härtl. 2013. Ereigniskonzeptualisierung im Zweitspracherwerb – Thinking for speaking im Vergleich von Muttersprachlern und Lernern. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 35(1–2): 159–191.
Berman, R. A., and D. Slobin (eds.). 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bohnemeyer, J., N. J. Enfield, J. Essegbey, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, S. Kita, F. Lüpke, and F. K. Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation: The case of motion events. Language 83: 495–532.
Bylund, E. 2008. Conceptualization processes of events in Spanish and Swedish. Revue Romane 43(1): 1–24.
Cadierno, T. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard and S. Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 13–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cadierno, T. 2008. Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus-on-form pedagogical approach. In S. de Knop, T. de Rycker, and R. Dirven (eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven, 259–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cadierno, T., and P. Robinson. 2009. Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalization patterns for describing motion events. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 245–276.
Cadierno, T., and L. Ruiz. 2006. Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4(1): 183–216.
Carroll, M., C. von Stutterheim, and R. Nüse. 2004. The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In C. Habel and T. Pechmann (eds.), Approaches to language production, 183–218. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Chen, L., and J. Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9): 1749–1766.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. 2003. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W., J. Barðdal, W. Hollmann, V. Sotirova, and C. Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar, 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Delucchi Danhier, R. 2017. Weganweisungen im Deutschen und Spanischen: Eine Vergleichsanalyse unter Anwendung von Visualisierungen. München: Verlag Dr. Hut.
Delucchi Danhier, R., and P. González Ávalos. LexiGraph: A web application for visualizing motion event lexicalization patterns. Available online at https://pga99.shinyapps.io/VSM_Vis/, accessed 22 December 2025.
Filipović, L. 2007. Talking about motion: A cross-linguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Georgakopoulos, T., H. Härtl, and A. Sioupi. 2019. Goal realization: An empirically based comparison between English, German and Greek. Languages in Contrast 19(2): 280–309.
Hill, D. J. 1992. Cluster analysis and the interlanguage lexicon. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 3: 67–77.
Johanson, M., and A. Papafragou. 2010. Universality and language specificity in the acquisition of path vocabulary. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, and L. L. Keil (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 185–196. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laws, J., A. Attwood, and J. Treffers-Daller. 2021. Unlearning the boundary-crossing constraint: Processing instruction and the acquisition of motion event construal. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60(4): 1089–1118.
Lupi, G. 2017. Data humanism: The revolutionary future of data visualization. PrintMag. Available online at https://www.printmag.com/article/data-humanism-future-of-data-visualization/, accessed 22 December 2025.
Meyer, J., and R. Land. 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education 49: 373–388.
Montero-Melis, G., S. Eisenbeiss, B. Narasimhan, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, S. Kita, A. Kopecka, F. Lüpke, T. Nikitina, I. Tragel, T. F. Jaeger, and J. Bohnemeyer. 2017. Satellite- vs. verb-framing underpredicts nonverbal motion categorization: Insights from a large language sample and simulations. Cognitive Semantics 3: 36–61.
Mora Gutiérrez, J. P., and P. Antela Costa. 2021. Teaching the difference between English and Spanish with regard to the expression of directed motion using a gamified conceptual workshop. Paper presented at the workshop Can Motion Event Construal be Taught or Reconstructed? Evidence from Bilinguals and L2 Learners, University of Reading, April 2021.
Navarro, S., and E. Nicoladis. 2005. Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, 102–107. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Park, H., S. Choi, and M. Lee. 2012. Visual input enhancement, attention, grammar learning, and reading comprehension: An eye movement study. English Teaching 67(4): 241–265.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/, accessed 22 December 2025.
Schacht, C., and R. Delucchi Danhier. 2025. ExpLay: A new corpus resource for research on expertise as an influential factor on language production. In Proceedings of the 19th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW-XIX), 216–227. Vienna: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Schlyter, S. 1984. L’acquisition des verbes de déplacement/mouvement par les adultes suédois. Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm 52.
Schlyter, S., and Å. Viberg. 1985. French and Swedish as targets in second language lexical acquisition. Scandinavian Working Papers in Bilingualism 4: 110–135.
Schmiedtová, B. 2011. Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2? International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 138–179.
Schmiedtová, B., and M. Flecken. 2008. Aspectual concepts across languages: Some considerations for second language learning. In S. de Knop and T. de Rycker (eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar, 357–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Slobin, D. 1991. Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics 1(1): 7–25.
Slobin, D. 1996a. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. 1996b. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In S. Thompson and M. Shibatani (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Slobin, D. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Talmy, L. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. 2023. Foreword: A taxonomy of cognitive semantics. In F. T. Li (ed.), Handbook of cognitive semantics. Leiden: Brill.
Treffers-Daller, J., and F. Tidball. 2015. Can L2 learners learn new ways to conceptualise events? Evidence from motion event construal among English-speaking learners of French. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, K. Schmitz, and N. Müller (eds.), The acquisition of French in multilingual contexts, 145–184. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
von Stutterheim, C., and R. Nüse. 2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production. Linguistics 41(5): 851–881.
von Stutterheim, C., M. Andermann, M. Carroll, M. Flecken, and B. Schmiedtová. 2012. How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye-tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics 50(4): 833–867.
Widodo, H. P. 2006. Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5(1): 122–141.
TU Dortmund University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-815X
appliedAI Institute for Europe
