Recalculating: The atlas of pragmatic parameters of developmental disorders
Anita Viszket
University of Pécs , HungaryAlexandra Hoss
University of Pécs , HungaryEszter Kárpáti
University of Pécs , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-1890
Gábor Alberti
University of Pécs , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-0715
Abstract
The paper demonstrates how pragmatic features of certain developmental disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorder, can be described in a formal pragmasemantic framework. We apply ÂeALIS, the pragmasemantic system (Alberti, Kleiber, Schnell, & Szabó 2016) which offers a formal representation for linguistically encoded speech acts and for the beliefs, desires and intentions that are present in the minds of potential interlocutors. It defines worldlets which include the BDI states of the speaker, as well as BDI states that the speaker assumes the hearer has, in an unlimited recursive pattern. The model is built upon the idea that the worldlets are organized in a system of multi-level tree-structures and are easily processable and accessible in communication for the intact human mind. In this formally defined system, the intensity of the different BDIs (e.g. strong/weak belief) belonging to the worldlets must be signaled by the interlocutors, using pragmatic tools. We found that pragmatic inaccuracy is detectable in ÂeALIS when it is related to inappropriate presentation of BDIs (e.g. inability to identify the illocutionary goals), poor reciprocity (e.g. ToM1 and ToM2 problems), impairment of coding/decoding (e.g. incorrect semantical and syntactical coding of the information structure) and insensitivity to intensity (e.g. the misuse of discourse markers). These symptoms can be present in any of the aforementioned disorders. Our “atlas” can illustrate that the so-called “pragmatic deficit” has a formally definable structure.
Keywords:
BDI, pragmatics, developmental disorders, HFA, ToMReferences
American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Alberti, G. 2000. Lifelong discourse representation structures. Gothenburg Papers in Computational Linguistics 5: 13–20.
Alberti, G., and J. Kleiber. 2010. The Grammar of eALIS and the Implementation of its Dynamic Interpretation. Informatica (Slovenia) 34(2): 103–110.
Alberti, G., Kleiber, J., Schnell, Zs., and V. Szabó. 2016. Intensional profiles and different kinds of human minds: “Case studies” about Hungarian imperative-like sentence types. LingBAW 2: 6–26.
Alberti, G., and L. Nőthig. 2015. ÂeALIS2.1: The Implementation of Generalized Intensional Truth Evaluation and Expositive Speech Acts in On-Going Discourse. International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems 8(1&2): 85–106.
Attwood, T. 2007. The Complete Guide to Asperger’s Syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., and U. Frith. 1985. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21: 37–46.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cummings, L. 2014. Pragmatic Disorders. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 3. London: Springer.
Farkas, D., and F. Roelofsen. 2017. Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Journal of Semantics 34(2): 237–289.
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Howlin, P., Baron-Cohen, S., and J. Hadwin. 1998. Teaching children with autism to mind-read. A practical guide for teachers and parents. Chichester: Wiley.
Kamp, H. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, Th. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts.
Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Maier, E. 2016. Attitudes and mental files in DRT. Rev. of Phil. Psychology 7: 473–490.
Oishi, E. 2016. Austin’s Speech Acts and Mey’s Pragmemes. In K. Allan, A. Capone and I. Kecskes (eds.), Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 9, 335–350. Switzerland: Springer.
Peeters, T. 1997. Autism. From Theoretical Understanding to Educational Intervention. London: Singular.
Pellicano, E. 2011. Psychological models of autism: an overview. In I. Roth and P. Rezaie (eds.), Researching the Autism Spectrum, 219–265. Cambridge: CUP.
Stalnaker, R. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721.
Szeteli, A., Alberti, G., Kleiber, J., and M. Dóla. 2018. The World is Built with our Words to Each Other. In V. Vincze (ed.), MSzNy-XIV, 78–88. Szeged: SzTE.
Wellman, H. M., and D. Liu. 2004. Scaling of Theory-of-Mind Tasks. Child Development 75: 523–541.
World Health Organization. 1993. The ISD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research (10th Revision). Genova: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. 2018. International Statistical Classification of Diseases (11th Revision). Retrieved from https://icd.who.int.
University of Pécs
University of Pécs
