A comparison of the modal dać się structure with the dispositional middle in Polish
Anna Bondaruk
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-2960
Abstract
The paper compares the modal dać się structure with the dispositional middle in Polish. It is argued that the two structures are similar as regards argument realization, i.e. in both constructions, the theme argument appears in the structural subject position. The two structures also have a dispositional meaning in common. However, they show a number of differences. They differ in the presence of a syntactically active agent, their aspectual properties, the availability of episodic interpretations, the obligatory presence of an adverbial modifier, and verb class restrictions. Although these differences seem to argue against a common syntactic derivation for the two structures analysed here, they do not preclude classifying the modal dać się structure as a subtype of the dispositional middle. If middles are seen as a notional category, understood as a special meaning that different grammatical structures can have, along the lines postulated by Condoravdi (1989), then the modal dać się structure can be subsumed under the label of middle. In fact, it is argued that the modal dać się structure represents Type II middles in Ackema and Schoorlemmer’s (2005) typology, and it shows properties typical of lassen-middles in German (Pitteroff 2014).
Keywords:
dispositional middles, lassen-middles, generic interpretation, dispositional meaning, (anti-)causative, implied agent, aspectReferences
Ackema, P., and M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua 93(1): 59-90.
Ackema, P., and M. Schoorlemmer. 2005. Middles. In M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. III, 131-203. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alexiadou, A., and E. Doron. 2011. The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48(1): 1-34.
Bondaruk, A. 2015. The syntax of the modal dać się structure in Polish, the paper presented at Bożena Rozwadowska’s 60th Birthday Anniversary Workshop in Wrocław, 4th Nov. 2015.
Cichosz, N. 2014. Polish experiencer and affectedness datives as adjuncts. Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII: 39-57.
Citko, B. 2011. Symmetry in syntax. Merge, Move and labels. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Condoravdi, C. 1989. The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. In P. Branigan, J. Gaulding, M. Kubo, and K. Murasugi (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 18-30.
Fagan, S. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: A study with special reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fellbaum, Ch. 1986. On the middle construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Frąckowiak, E., and M. L. Rivero. 2011. Unintentional agents vs. unintentional causers in Polish. In P. Bański, B. Łukaszewicz, M. Opalińska, and J. Zaleska (eds.), Generative investigations. Syntax, morphology, and phonology, 198-213. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Gehrmann, M. 1983. Zu den polnischen Entsprechungen modalpassivischer Konstruktionen des Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Slavistik 28(1): 9-17.
Golendzinowska, M. 2004. Syntactic transitivity of SE-reflexives in Polish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 93-120.
Greenberg, Y. 1998. Temporally restricted generics. In D. Strolovitch, and A. Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of SALT VIII, 55-73. http://elanguage.net/jounrals/salt/article/view/8.55
Grimshaw, J., and S. Vikner. 1993. Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events. In E. Reuland, and W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language, volume II. Lexical and conceptual structure, 143-155. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hale, K., and S. J. Keyser. 1987. A view from the middle. MIT Lexicon Project Working Paper 10. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT Cambridge, MA.
Hoekstra, T., and I. Roberts. 1993. Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In E. Reuland, and W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language, volume II. Lexical and conceptual structure, 183-220. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Keyser, S. J., and T. Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 115-156.
Kibort, A. 2004. Passive and passive-like constructions in English and Polish. Ph.D. diss., Cambridge, University of Cambridge.
Kit, O. 2013. Extending the generic middle analysis to Slavic languages. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1): 1-20.
Kit, O. 2014. On the complex eventive structure of dispositional middle constructions. MA thesis., Hamilton, McMaster University.
Kratzer, A. 1991. Modality. In A. von Stechov, and D. Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639-656. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krifka, M., F. J. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Link, and G. Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson, and F. J. Pelletier (eds.) The generic book, 1-124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Krzek, M. 2013. The syntax of impersonal constructions in Polish. Ph.D. diss., Newcastle, University of Newcastle.
Lekakou, M. 2005. In the middle, somewhat elevated. The semantics of middles and its crosslinguistic realization. Ph. D. diss., London, University of London.
Levin, B. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B., and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marelj, M. 2004. Middles and argument structure across languages. Ph.D. diss., Utrecht, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.
Menéndez-Benito, P. 2013. On dispositional sentences. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, and F. del Prete (eds.), Genericity, 276-292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitteroff, M. 2014. Non-canonical lassen-middles. Ph.D. diss., Stuttgart, University of Stuttgart.
Pitteroff, M., and A. Alexiadou. 2012. On the properties of German sich-lassen middles. In J. Choi, A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schetrz, and A. Trueman (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 214-222. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Pylkkänen, L. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reinhart, T. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
Reinhart, T. 2000. The theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
Reinhart, T. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229-290.
Rivero, M., A. Arregui, and E. Frąckowiak. 2010. Variation in circumstantial modality: Polish versus St’àt’imcets. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4): 704-714.
Roberts, I. 1987. The representation of implicit and dethematised subjects. Dordrecht: Foris.
Schäfer, F. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. External arguments in change of state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siloni, T. 2003. Active lexicon. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383-400.
Stroik, T. 1992. Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 127-137.
Stroik, T. 1999. Middles and reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 119-131.
Topolińska, Z. 1993. The verb dać/ dawać in Polish periphrastic constructions. In G. Henstchel, and R. Laskowski (eds.), Studies in Polish morphology and syntax, 229-249. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Vendler, Z. 1984. Adverbs of action. In J. Drogo, V. Mishra, and D. Testen (eds.), CLS 20: Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 297-307. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
von Waldenfels, R. 2012. The grammaticalization of ‘give’ + infinitive. A comparative study of Russian, Polish, and Czech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
von Waldenfels, R. 2015. Grammaticalization of ‘give’ in Slavic between drift and contact: causative, modal, imperative, existential, optative and volative constructions. In B. Nolan, G. Rawoens, and E. Diedrichsen (eds.), Causation, permission, and transfer. Argument realization in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs, 107-127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. 1998. The semantics of English causative constructions in a universal-typological perspective. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 105-143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
