A case for two voices in Old Church Slavonic – reflexively marked OCS verbs
Anna Malicka-Kleparska
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7682
Abstract
Old Church Slavonic data manifest significant similarities in the distribution and formal properties of anticausatives, reflexives, subject experiencer verbs, statives, and reciprocals, while their semantics may also be viewed as partly uniform. The structures representing the said classes of verbs are very frequent in the language, while passive structures, formed with analytic morpho-syntactic constructions, are relatively infrequent. Consequently, the expressions headed by anticausatives, reflexives, subject experiencer verbs, statives, and reciprocals (as well as dative impersonal structures) encroach on the area of semantics belonging in Modern Slavic to be the realm expressed in terms of passive morpho-syntax. The conclusion that can be drawn from this state of affairs is that Old Church Slavonic is characterized by the opposition of active and middle voices, while the passive voice is in its infancy.
Keywords:
middle voice, passive, anticausative, subject experiencer verb, reflexive, Old Church SlavonicReferences
Alexiadou, A. 2010. On the morpho-syntax of (anti)causative verbs. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 177-203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, A., and E. Anagnostopoulou. 2004. Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation; evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface, 114-136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, A., and E. Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48 (1): 1-34.
Belletti, A., and L. Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291-352.
Brajerski, T. 1966. Język staro-cerkiewno-słowiański. Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego: Lublin.
Cennano, M. 1995. Patterns of ‘active’ syntax in Late Latin pleonastic reflexives. In J. Smith, and D. Lentley
(eds.), Historical Linguistics 1995: Volume 1: General issues and non-Germanic languages.36- 53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Embick, D. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 355-392.
Embick, D. 2009. Roots, states, and stative passives. Abstract for Root Workshop, University of Stuttgart.
Everaert, M., M. Marelj, and T. Siloni. 2012. The theta system: an introduction. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, and T. Siloni (eds.), Argument structure at the interface,1-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gorković-Major, J. 2009. The role of syntactic transitivity in the development of Slavic syntactic structures. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 74: 63-74.
Jasanoff, J. 2002-2003. Stative *-ē- revisited. Die Sprache 43(2): 127-170.
Junghanns, U., D. Ferhmann, and D. Lenertová. 2011. Decausatives in a minimal theory of reflexive marking. A paper presented on the 9th of December 2011 at FDSL conference in Göttingen, Germany.
Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck, and L. Zarig (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krause, T., and J. Slocum. 2013. Old Church Slavonic online. http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers
Kulikov, L. 2011. Passive to anticausative through impersonalization. The case of Vedic and Indo-European. In A. Malchukov, and A. Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 229-254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kulikov, L. 2013. Middle and reflexive. In S. Luraghi, and C. Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to syntax, 261-278. Bloomsbury: London.
Landau, I. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lomashvili, L. 2011. Complex predicates. The syntax-morphology interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lunt, H. 2001. Old Church Slavonic Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. New York.
Madariaga, N. 2009.The triggering of structural case-marked objects in Old and Present-Day Russian. Die Welt der Slaven special issue 2009. https://www.academia.edu/1024645/
Madariaga, N. 2010. The development of Indo-European middle-passive verbs: a case study in Ancient Greek and Old Church Slavonic. Indogermanische Forschungen. Zeitschrift für Indogermanistik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 115: 149-178.
Marantz, A. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Medová, L. 2011. Anticausatives are derived unergatives. In M, Ziková and M. Dočekal (eds.), Slavic languages in formal grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, 272-291. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Pantcheva, M. 2010. Directional expressions cross-linguistically: Nanosyntax and lexicalization. Nordlyd 36: 7-39.
Pylkkänen, L. 2008. Introducing arguments. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 48. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramchand, G. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rothmayer, A. 2009. The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rozwadowska, B. (to appear). Psychological verbs and psychological adjectives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax.
Savčenko, A. N. 1974. Sravnitel’naja grammatika indoevropejskix jazykov. URSS: Moskva.
Slovnik jazyka staroslověnského. 1958. Praha: Nakladatelství Československié Akademie Věd.
Vaillant, A. 2002 [1948] Manuel du vieux slave. Paris. [Russian translation 2002 Rukovodstvo po staroslovjanskomu jazyku]. Moskva: URSS.
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7682
