The Information Status of Old English Constructions with Titles and Proper Names
Elżbieta Sielanko-Byford
Centre for Foreign Language Teacher Training and European Education of the University of Warsaw , PolandAbstract
The paper examines the information status of Old English structures consisting of proper names and titles. The nominal constructions under discussion fall into three categories: the Ælfred cyning type of structure, where the title appears without any determiner and follows the proper name, the Ælfred se cyning type, where the title appears with a determiner and follows the proper name, and the se cyning Ælfred type, where the title with a determiner precedes the proper name. It is demonstrated that the se cyning Ælfred construction is mainly used anaphorically: an overwhelming majority of the examples of the structure in the Old English texts examined here refer back to an entity mentioned in the preceding discourse. Moreover, most of the antecedents of the se cyning Ælfred structures appear to be local, that is they occur in the same or in the immediately preceding structural unit. It is argued that the anaphoric nature of the se cyning Ælfred constructions may be responsible for their distribution in Old English texts.
Keywords:
information status, discourse, Discourse-old, Discourse-new, anaphors, Inferrables, antecedentReferences
Bately, J. (ed.). 1980. The Old English Orosius. Early English Text Society Supplementary Series 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bately, J. 1985. The compilation of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle once more. Leeds Studies in English 16: 7-26.
Bately, J. (ed.). 1986. The Anglo Saxon Chronicle: A collaborative edition. Volume 3: Ms A. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Carlton, Charles 1970. Descriptive syntax of the Old English charters. The Hague: Mouton.
DOE Corpus = The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form, 2000 Release. Compiled by A. diPaolo Healey, J. Holland, I. McDougall, and P. T. Mielke. University of Toronto Center for Medieval Studies DOE Project. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Earle, J., and C. Plummer. 1892-9, reissued by D. Whitelock, 1952. Two of the Saxon chronicles parallel, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fox, B.A. 1987. Anaphora in popular written English narratives. In R.S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 157-174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giusti, G. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95-123. London: Longman.
Heusinger, K. von. 2007. Accessibility and definite noun phrases. In M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten, and M. Knees (eds.), Anaphors in text. Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference, 123-144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, Y. 2006. Anaphora, cataphora, exophora, logophoricity. In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, volume 1, 231-238. Oxford: Elsevier. 2nd edition.
Irvine, S. (ed.). 2004. The Anglo Saxon chronicle: A collaborative edition. Volume 7: Ms E. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Miller, T. (ed. and trans.). 1890-98. The Old English version of Bede’s ecclesiastical history of the English people, The Early English Text Society 79. London: Trubner & Co.
Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peltola, N. 1960. On appositional constructions in Old English prose. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 61: 159-203.
Prince, E. F. 1992. The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status. In W. C. Mann, and S. A. Thomson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 295-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schwarz-Friesel, M. 2007. Indirect anaphora in text. In M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten, and M. Knees (eds.), Anaphors in text. Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference, 3-20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shannon, A. 1964. A descriptive syntax of the Parker manuscript of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle from 734 to 891. The Hague: Mouton.
Shores, D. L. 1971. A descriptive syntax of the Peterborough chronicle from 1122 to 1154. The Hauge: Mouton.
Sielanko-Byford, E. 2013. Apposition in Old English. Ph.D. dissertation, Lublin, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II.
Sprockel C. 1973. The language of the Parker chronicle, 2 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Strube, M. 2007. Corpus-based and machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten, and M. Knees (eds.), Anaphors in Text. Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference, 207-222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C., and S. Pintzuk. 2008. Coding the York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose to investigate the syntax-pragmatics interface. In D. Minkova, and S. Fitzmaurice (eds.), Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 61-80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Centre for Foreign Language Teacher Training and European Education of the University of Warsaw
