Being at home: Global citizenship in Norwegian schools. A study of children’s poems
Susan Erdmann
University of Agder , NorwayBarbara Gawronska
University of Agder , NorwayAbstract
The paper addresses the question of self-perceived identity in children attending international schools in Norway. In this population, the distinction between “home culture” and “host culture” is no longer relevant, since most of the children represent “hyphenated” (e.g. Asian-British or American-Scandinavian) or merged nationalities and cultures. The goal of the study is to investigate how these pupils define themselves and the notion of “home”. To achieve at least a preliminary picture of the children’s self-perception, the authors have analysed poems on two topics: Me and Home, written by pupils of an international school and a Norwegian school, both informant groups aged 11-13. A semantic analysis of the poems indicates that the international school children present strong assertions of individual identity as defined against societal roles, while the Norwegian school pupils do not conceptualize identity formation as a struggle and their poems reflect a high degree of social, familial and national integration.
Keywords:
identity, international schooling, self-perception, multicultural network, children’s poems, semantic associationsReferences
Aitchison, J. 1994. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Block, D. 2007. Second language identities. London: Continuum.
Brummitt, N. and A. Keeling. 2013. Charting the growth of international schools. In R. Pearce (ed.), International education and schools: Moving beyond the first 40 years, 25-36. London: Bloomsbury.
Cheah, P. 2006. Inhuman conditions: On cosmopolitanism and human rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clark, N. 2014.The Booming international schools sector – WENR. Accessed July 08, 2016. http://wenr.wes.org/2014/07/the-booming-international-schools-sector/.
Darvin, R., and B. Norton. 2015. Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 36-56.
Dower, N. 2003. An introduction to global citizenship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
“Facts and Figures.” 2016. http://www.ibo.org/about-the-ib/facts-and-figures/.
Hall, S., Held, D. and A.G. McGrew. 1992. Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press in Association with the Open University.
Hurford, J.R. 1991. The evolution of critical period for language acquisition. Cognition 40: 159-201.
Joerchel, A. 2006. A qualitative study of multicultural identities: Three cases of London’s Inner-City children. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(2). Accessed February 16, 2016.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1983. Which comes first: Logic or rationality? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6(2): 252.
Labov, W. 1973. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Miller, G.A., and P.N. Johnson-Laird. 1976. Perception and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, G.A. and P.M. Gildea. 1987. How children learn words. Scientific American 257(3): 86-91.
Murphy, G.L. 1991. Meaning and concepts. In P.J. Schwanenfugel (ed.), The psychology of word meanings, 11-35. Hillsborough, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ostberg, S. 2003. Norwegian-Pakistani adolescents: Negotiating religion, gender, ethnicity and social boundaries. Young 11(2): 161-181.
Roberts, B. 2003. What should international schools be; from emergent theory to practice. International Schools Journal 22(2): 69-79.
Snow, C.E. and M. Hoefnagel-Höhle. 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development 49(4): 1114-1128.
Sobhani, M.S. Me. 2014. The Australian. August 29, 2014. Accessed September 01, 2014. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/books/who-i-am-asylum-child-and-poet-of-repute/news-story/698975249d06effeb4934d5ef43471b4.
Steen, G. 2013. The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. Academia.edu. 2013. https://www.academia.edu/3499506/The_cognitive-linguistic_revolution_in_metaphor_studies.
