Exemplification in academic discourse structure
Abstract
The study examines the role that exemplification plays in academic discourse. As the latest approaches emphasize, discourse is an interactional activity involving as participants both the writer and the reader. In order to ensure the proper understanding of his/her message, writers make use of different discourse strategies such as reformulation, specification, generalization or elaboration. We focus on how exemplification, viewed as the satellite, contributes to the better recognition of the subject matter, which is understood as the nucleus. In the first two sections of the study, we present an overview of discourse relations which call for the use of constructions applied in exemplification. The second part, which is based on the linguistic material obtained from a close scrutiny of two classic articles from the field of linguistics and one linguistic textbook, is devoted to the description of how exemplification contributes to specification and elaboration. We try to find and describe the specific relations, for example set-member, whole-part, process-step and object-attribute which hold between the nucleus and the satellite. Finally, we attempt at listing discourse areas which call for exemplification. The study illustrates that what are known as separate discourse relations are in fact closely related.
Keywords:
exemplification, discourse structure, discourse relations, academic discourseReferences
Langacker, R.W. 2006. Introduction to Concept, Image, and Symbol. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 29-68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reinhart, T., and E. Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.
Carnie, A. 2006. Syntax: a generative introduction. Second Edition. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Asher, N., and L. Vieu. 2005. Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115: 591-610.
Bärenfänger, M., D. Goecke, M. Hilbert, H. Lüngen, and M. Stührenberg. 2008. Anaphora as an indicator of elaboration: A corpus study. JLCL 23/2: 49-73.
Corston-Oliver, S.H. 1998. Computing of Representations of the Structure of Written Discourse. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Cote, S. 1997. Elaboration: A function and a form. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Danlos, Laurence. 2001. Event coreference in causal discourses. In P. Bouillon, and F. Busa (eds.), The Language of Word Meaning, 216-241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hobbs, J.R. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse. CSLI.
Hyland, K. 2007. Applying a gloss: exemplification and reformulation in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics 28(2): 266-285.
Jasinskaja, K., and E. Karagjosova. 2011. Elaboration and Explanation. In Proceedings of Constraints in Discourse IV, September 14th-16th, 2011, Agay-Roches Rouges, Var, France.
Knott, A., J. Oberlander, M. O’Donnell, and C. Melish. Beyond elaboration: the interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, and W. Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 181-196. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Lascarides, A., and N. Asher. 2009. Agreement, disputes and commitments in dialogue. Journal of Semantics 26(2): 109-158.
Mann, W.C., and S. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of text Structures. In G. Kempen (ed.), Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics, 85-95. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Mann, W.C., and S. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243-281.
Polanyi, L. 1988. A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 601-638.
Taboada, M. 2006. Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 567-592.
Taboada, M., and W.C. Mann. 2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies 8(3): 423-459.
Webber, B., M. Egg, and V. Kordoni. 2012. Discourse structure and language technology. Natural Language Engineering 18: 437-490.
