Second Order Coherence: A new way of looking at incoherence in texts
Ib Ulbaek
University of Copenhagen , DenmarkAbstract
By using van Dijk’s concept of coherence and bringing it together with my Principle of meaning iconicity, we have a new way of looking at incoherence in texts. The principle says that closely related information is meaningfully related on a pragmatic level, an instruction to the reader to relate the information to each other. It is demonstrated by textual analysis that the concept of coherence can be used analytically by dividing it into first and second order coherence. First order coherence is the usual concept of coherence: sentences are connected by cohesive links and related by causality, time etc. Second order coherence is a way of organizing text by using incoherence as a way of organizing text into chunks of coherent parts. It is shown how readers can detect these structures in the text by detecting the incoherence even without the layout of the text to signal structure (e.g. indention of paragraphs).
Keywords:
text linguistics, coherence, text analysis, pragmaticsReferences
Auken, S., P. Schantz Lauridsen and A. Juhl Rasmussen (eds.). 2015. Genre and...: Copenhagen Studies in Genre 2, Vol. 2 1. Valby: Ekbatana.
Beugrande, R.-A. and W. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dijk, T. van. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.
Dijk, T. van. 1980. Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Grice, P. 1989. Logic and conversation. In P. Grice: Studies in the Way of Words, 22-40. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naess, A. 1966. Communication and Argument. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Polanyi, L. 1995. The linguistic structure of discourse. CSLI Publication.
Togeby, O. 1993. Praxt. Pragmatisk tekstteori 1-2. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Ulbaek, I. 2001. Pipelines and pipelining: a theoretical discussion of a concept to explain coherence between paragraphs. In L. Degand (ed.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse, 41-49. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek.
Ulbaek, I. 2005. Sproglig tekstanalyse. Introduktion til pragmatisk tekstanalyse. Copenhagen: Academica.
Ulbaek, I. 2013a. Andenordenskohærens. In NyS, 45: 73-103.
Ulbaek, I. 2013b. Har tekstafsnit realitet? In S. Borchmann (ed.), Gode ord er bedre end guld: Festskrift til Henrik Jørgensen i anledning af 60-årsdagen, 501-514. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Wadler, J. 2013. The Sex Toys in the Attic. New York Times, November 9.
