The locative syntax of Experiencers. The case study of phraseological units as psych-predicates
Anna Dąbrowska
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-4070
Abstract
The name psych-verbs is commonly assigned to verbs denoting mental or emotional states, such as fear, worry, frighten, or surprise. Such verbs select a participant/an individual who experiences an emotional or mental state, usually referred to as an Experiencer, and a non-Experiencer argument, sometimes called stimulus, trigger of emotion, causer or target/subject matter, or subsumed under the label of ‘theme’ (Landau, 2010, p. 5). The special behaviour of Experiencers, related to the so-called ‘psych effects’, is the reason why psychological predicates have been a subject of debate in theoretical syntax for several decades.
The aim of this study is to check whether English verbal phraseological units, which denote a psychological condition of an Experiencer and occur with locative Prepositional Phrases (PPs), may serve as evidence for Landau’s (2010, p. 6) hypothesis of ‘Experiencers as mental locations’. Landau’s theory has been chosen since it covers a much broader variety of data, in comparison with the previous approaches, offered by Belletti & Rizzi (1988), Grimshaw (1990), and Pesetsky (1995), among others.
The data analysed in the paper have been extracted from English dictionaries of idiomatic expressions, supported with the COCA Corpus. The study focuses on Object Experiencer verbal phraseological units that display a structure V + PP. The results of the study reveal that, in total, out of 3,000 tokens, there are only 50 psychological verbal idiomatic expressions with an Object Experiencer. However, the data show that a lexical P with the Experiencer as an object appears only in 13 (26%) idiomatic expressions out of the 50, whereas 37 items (74%) include an Experiencer preceded with no P. The latter might be treated as exhibiting an oblique Experiencer with a null preposition. However, no relevant syntactic evidence can be found in support the claim that there is a covert P in this type of phrase. Therefore, the results do not provide enough evidence in favour of Landau’s (2010) theory of Experiencers as mental locations, placed either in a covert or overt PP.
Keywords:
psych-verbs, Experiencers, mental locations, verbal idiomsReferences
Arad, M. (1998). Psych-notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10. London: University College.
Arad, M. (2000). Psych Verbs and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Ms., University of Geneva.
Baker, M. C. (1997). Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 73-137). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291-352.
Bouchard, D. (1995). The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English). Available at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/, last accessed on 25th January 2016.
Doron, E. (2003). Agency and voice: the semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11, 1-67.
Dowty, D. R. (1991). Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection. Language 67, 547-619.
Emonds, J. (1985). A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R. (2015). Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review (De Gruyter Mounton) 32(2), 167-215.
Google Books Corpus. Accessed online at: http://googlebooks.byu.edu/x.asp
Guidi, L. G. (2011). Old English psych-verbs and quirky experiencers. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2 (11), 29-48.
Grafmiller, J. (2013). The semantics of syntactic choice: An analysis of English emotion verbs. Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Iwata, S. (1995). The Distinctive Character of Psych-Verbs as Causatives. Linguistic Analysis 1-2, 95-120.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, K. (1992). Scope and Binding Theory: Comments on Zubizarreta. In T. Stowell & E. Wehrli (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 26: Syntax and the Lexicon (pp. 259-275). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
Keysar, B., & Bly, B. M. (1999). Swimming against the current: do idioms reflect conceptual structure? Journal of Pragmatics 31(12), 1559-1578.
Klein, K., & Kutscher, S. (2005). Lexical Economy and Case Selection of Psych-Verbs in German. Köln/Bochum: Manuskript. Unpublished.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4, 195-208.
Landau, I. (2010). The Locative Syntax of Experiencers (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 53: x+165). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marín, R., & McNally, L. (2011). Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29, 467-502.
McCloskey, J., & Sells, P. (1988). Control and A-Chains in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 143-189.
O’Dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2010). English Idioms in Use Advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perlmutter, D. M., & Postal, P. (1984). The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In D. M. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (Eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2 (pp. 81-125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, L. (2000). On Stativity and Causation. In C. L. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspective of Lexical Semantics and Syntax (pp. 417-444). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
Reinhart, T. (2002). The Theta System – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28, 229-290.
Roberts, I. (1991). NP-movement, Crossover and Chain Formation. In H. Haider & K. Netter (Eds.), Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar (pp. 17-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Seidl, J., & McMordie, W. (1978). English Idioms and How to Use Them (Fourth Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Speas, M. (1990). Comments on Papers by James Gair, Yamura Kachru and K.P. and Tara Mohanan. In M. K. Verma & K. P. Mohanan (Eds.), Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages (pp. 77-83). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
Stowell, T. (1986). Psych-Movement in the Mapping Between D Structure and LF. Paper presented at GLOW 9.
Tenny, C. (1998). Psych Verbs and Verbal Passives in Pittsburghese. Linguistics 36, 591-597.
van Voorst, J. (1992). The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(1), 65-92.
Verhoeven, E. (2010). Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology 14, 213-251.
Wielki multimedialny słownik angielsko-polski i polsko-angielski. [Great Multimedia English-Polish and Polish-English Dictionary]. 2005. Oxford: PWN-Oxford.
