Little pro’s, but how many of them? – On 3SG null pronominals in Hungarian
Gréte Dalmi
Abstract
While Hungarian 3SG individual reference null pronominals are in free variation with their lexical counterparts, 3SG generic reference null pronominals do not show such variation. This follows from the fact that Hungarian 3SG generic null pronominals behave like bound variables, i.e. they always require a 3SG generic lexical antecedent in an adjacent clause. Both the 3SG generic lexical antecedent and the 3SG generic null pronominal must be in the scope of the GN operator, which is seated in SpeechActParticipantPhrase (SAPP), the leftmost functional projection of the left periphery in the sentence (see Alexiadou & D’Alessandro, 2003; Bianchi, 2006). GN binds all occurrences of the generic variable in accessible worlds (see Moltmann 2006 for English one/oneself). These properties distinguish Hungarian from the four major types of Null Subject Languages identified by Roberts & Holmberg (2010).
Keywords:
null pronominal, generic, bound variableReferences
Alexiadou, A., & D’Alessandro, R. (2003). Inclusive and exclusive impersonal pronouns: a feature-geometrical analysis. Rivista di grammatica generativa 27, 31-44.
Bèjar, S., & Rezac, M. (2009). Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 35-73.
Bianchi, V. (2006). The syntax of personal arguments. Lingua 116, 2023-2067.
Bródy, M. (2011). Az ember és az emberek. [One and people]. Talk given at the Research Institute for Linguistics, HAS, Budapest.
Cinque, G. (1988). On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 521-581.
Dalmi, G. (2010). Copular sentences, predication, and cyclic agree. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing (VDM Verlag).
Dalmi, G. (2013). ALL-IN-ONE: Generic inclusive subjects in Hungarian. Proceedings of WCCFL 31, 115-123, Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Dalmi, G. (2014). The feature geometry of generic inclusive null DPs in Hungarian. In A. Bondaruk, G. Dalmi, & A. Grosu (Eds.), Advances in the syntax of DPs. Structure, agreement and case. Linguistik Aktuell 217 (pp. 165-193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dalmi, G. (2016). What does it take to be a copula? YPLM 2: 1-28. Berlin: De Gruyter Online.
Egerland, V., & Sigurðsson, H. (2009). Impersonal null subjcts in Icelandic and elsewhere. Studia Linguistica 63, 158-185.
É .Kiss, K. (1987). Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.
É. Kiss, K. (2002). Hungarian Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harley, H., & Ritter. E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3), 482-526.
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 533–564.
Holmberg, A. (2010). The null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation to T. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation. Null subjects in Minimalist Theory (pp. 200–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmberg, A., & Sheehan, M. (2010). Control into finite clauses in partial null subject languages. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation. Null subjects in Minimalist Theory (pp. 125–153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmberg, A., & Phimsawat, O. (2013). Generic pronouns and phi-features. Evidence from Thai. Ms.
Jaeggli O., & Safir, K. (1989). The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jónsson, J. G. (1992). Maður. Ms.
Kenesei, I. (1989). On pronominal binding in Hungarian. In L. Marácz & P. Muysken (Eds.), Configurationality. The typology of asymmetries (pp. 223-236). Dordrecht: Foris.
Kratzer, A. (2000). German impersonal pronouns and logophoricity. Paper presented at the Generic Pronouns and Logophoricity Conference. Sao Paolo.
Krzek, M. (2012). The syntax of impersonal constructions in Polish. PhD dissertation. Dept of Lingusitcs, University of Newcastle.
Moltmann, F. (2006). Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14, 257–281.
Noyer, R. F. (1992). Features, position, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD dissertation. MIT. Cambridge, MA.
Noyer, R. F. (1997). Features, position, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. (2010). Introduction. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan, Parametric variation. Null subjects in Minimalist Theory (pp. 1–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sigurðsson, H. Á. (2004). The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16, 219-251. (Special issue edited by V. Bianchi and K. Safir)
Tóth, I. (2011). Non-referential readings of null subjects in Hungarian. In T. Laczkó, G. Rákosi, & C. Ringen (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 12, 209–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
