The use of metonymy and metaphor in descriptive essays by intermediate and advanced EFL students
Oleksandr Kapranov
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences , NorwayAbstract
This article involves an empirical linguistic study aimed at elucidating the use of metonymy and metaphor in descriptive essays written by a group of intermediate EFL students (further referred to as ‘participants’). 20 participants were recruited at Stockholm University, Sweden and matched with a control group comprised of 20 advanced EFL students at the same university. The participants and their respective controls were given five pictorial stimuli containing famous architectural landmarks in Sweden. The participants and the control group were instructed to write a one paragraph descriptive essay about each pictorial stimulus using either i) an imaginary and creative approach or ii) a non-imaginary and purely descriptive approach. The corpus of the participants’ and controls’ essays was subsequently analysed in the computer program WordSmith (Scott, 1996). Quantitative analysis in WordSmith yielded descriptive statistics involving word frequencies. Then, the corpus was analysed manually for the presence of metonymy and metaphor. Qualitative findings seem to support previous research (MacArthur, 2010; Haghshenas & Hashemian, 2016), which suggests that the use of metonymy tends to be associated with the intermediate level of EFL writing, whilst both metonymy and metaphor are predominantly found in the writing by advanced EFL learners.
Keywords:
advanced EFL level, essay, intermediate EFL level, metonymy, metaphorReferences
Blackston, M. (1993). Beyond brand personality: building brand relationships. Brand equity and advertising: Advertising’s role in building strong brands, 113-124.
Boers, F. (2003). Applied Linguistics Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Variation in Conceptual Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231-238.
Burgers, C. (2016). Conceptualizing Change in Communication Through Metaphor. Journal of Communication, 66, 250-265.
Caballero, R. (2003). How to talk shop through metaphor: bringing metaphor research to the ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 177–194.
Caballero, R. (2013). The Role of Metaphor in Architects' Negotiation and (Re)Construction of Knowledge Across Genres. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 3-21.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. London: Continuum.
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671-690.
Chapeton, C. M. (2010). Metaphor Identification in EFL Argumentative Writing: A Corpus-driven Study. Folios, 32, 125-140.
Charteris-Black, J. (2003). Speaking With Forked Tongue: A Comparative Study of Metaphor and Metonymy in English and Malay Phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 289-310.
Chen, Y.-C., & Lai, H.-L. (2014). The influence of cultural universality and specificity on EFL learners’ comprehension of metaphor and metonymy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 312-336.
Danesi, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: the neglected dimension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Language, communication, and social meaning (pp. 489–500). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
De Mendoza Ibanez, F.R. (1997). Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Metonymy. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 612, 161-178.
Dickerson, J. (2012). Metonymy and Indexicality: People and Place in the Five Points. Rhetoric Review, 31(4), 405-421.
Gao, L-Q., & Meng, G.-H. (2010). A Study on the Effect of Metaphor Awareness Raising on Chinese EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. Canadian Social Science, 6(2), 110-124.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., & Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (Vol. 175). John Benjamins Publishing.
González, V., Chen, C.-Y. & Sanchez, C. (2001). Cultural Thinking and Discourse Organizational Patterns Influencing Writing Skills in a Chinese English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) Learner. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 627-652.
Haghshenas, M. S. M., & Hashemian, M. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Two Strategies of Etymological Elaboration and Pictorial Elucidation on Idiom Learning: A Case of Young EFL Iranian Learners. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 140.
Horowitz, D. (1990). Fiction and Nonfiction in the ESL/EFL Classroom: Does the Difference Make a Difference? English for Specific Purposes, 9, 161-168.
Kalyuga, M. & Kalyuga, S. (2008). Metaphor awareness in teaching vocabulary. The Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 249-257.
Kecskes, I. (2000). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances in L2. Links and Letters, 7, 145-161.
Kovecses, Z. (2013). The Metaphor-Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75-88.
Lakoff, G. J., & Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Walter de Gruyter.
Lin, C. J-Y. (2015). ‘On Cloud Nine’ and ‘On All Fours’: Which is More Transparent? Elements in EFL Learners’ Transparency Assumptions. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 12(2), 41-85.
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Littlemore, J. (2010). Metaphoric competence in the first and second language. Similarities and differences. In M. Putz and L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the Learner’s Mind (pp. 293-315). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Littlemore, J. (2012). The role of metaphor and metonymy in EFL proficiency. The Language Teacher, 36(4), 15-17.
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268-294.
Littlemore, J., Trautman Chen, P., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 1-12.
MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical competence in EFL: Where are we and where should we be going? A view from the language classroom. AILA Review, 23(1), 155-173.
MacArthur, F. & Piquer Píriz, A. M. (2007). Staging the Introduction of Figurative Extensions of Familiar Vocabulary Items in EFL: Some Preliminary Considerations. A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 53, 123-135.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. Metonymy in language and thought, 4, 17-60.
Radic-Bojanic, B. (2013). Internalization and Production of Metaphorical Expressions with EFL Students. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 135-144.
Roldán-Riejos, A., & Úbeda Mansilla, P. (2013). Metaphor in the ESP engineering context. Ibérica, 25, 107-126.
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 547-563.
Scott, M. (1996). WordSmith tools. Software program
Seto, K. I. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. Metonymy in language and thought, 91-120.
Turker, E. (2016). The role of L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge and frequency in the acquisition of L2 metaphorical expressions. Second Language Research, 32(1), 25-48.
Warren, B. (1999). Aspects of referential metonymy. In K. panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 121-138). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Warren, B. (2002). An Alternative Account of the Interpretation of Referential Metonymy and Metaphor. The Department of English in Lund: Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1-11.
