Compositional analysis of interrogative imperatives in Hungarian
Judit Kleiber
University of Pécs , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7571-6949
Gábor Alberti
University of Pécs , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-0715
Abstract
The paper investigates utterances which combine imperative and interrogative elements in Hungarian. We intend to explore the scope of the hypothesis that the pragmatico-semantic content of mixed-type sentences can be obtained compositionally. We present four types of interrogative imperative. The imperative factor is indicated by subjunctive morphology on the verb. The interrogative character is represented by (1) rise-fall intonation which marks polar questions, (2) the discourse marker ugye expressing bias, (3) the particle vajon expressing self-reflection or hesitation, and (4) wavy intonation which indicates surprise. We claim that such sentences are primarily questions with their main function being ‘request for instruction’. For the analysis, we take a formal pragmatico-semantic point of view. Our goal is to demonstrate how these sentences can be analyzed compositionally within a belief–desire–intention frame. We apply the formal dynamic discourse- and mind-representation theory ReALIS. We have found that the pragmatico-semantic content (intensional profile) of each type can be constructed via using two formal operations: concatenation and pragmasemantic blending. The composition produces the required output, namely that the interrogation / bias / speculation / surprise which pertains to an eventuality in the case of a simple question, pertains to the “commanding” of this eventuality in the case of interrogative imperatives.
Keywords:
pragmatico-semantic analysis, belief–desire–intention framework, discourse representation theory, discourse markersReferences
Alberti, G. (2011). ReALIS: Interpretálók a világban, világok az interpretálóban [Interpreters in the world, worlds in the interpreter]. Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Alberti, G., Dóla, M., & and Kleiber, J. (2014). Mood and modality in Hungarian: Discourse Representation Theory meets Cognitive Linguistics. Argumentum, 10, 172–191.
Alberti, G., & Kleiber, J. (2014). ReALIS: Discourse Repre¬sentation with a Radically New Ontology. In L. Veselovská & M. Janebová (Eds.), Complex Visibles Out There. Olomouc Modern Language Series 4 (pp. 513¬–528). Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University.
Alberti, G., Kleiber, J.; Schnell, Z.; & Szabó, V. (2016). Intensional profiles and different kinds of human minds: “Case studies” about Hungarian imperative-like sentence types. Linguistics Beyond and Within, 2, 6–26.
Alberti, G., Vadász, N., & Kleiber, J. (2014). Ideal and Deviant Interlocutors in a Formal Interpretation System. In A. Zuczkowski, R. Bongelli, I. Riccioni, & C. Canestrari (Eds.), Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts. Dialogue Studies 25 (pp. 59–78). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gärtner, HM., & Gyuris, B. (2012). Pragmatic markers in Hungarian: Some introductory remarks. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 59, 387–426.
Gyuris, B. (2009). Sentence-types, discourse particles and intonation in Hungarian. In T. Solstad & A. Riester (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13 (pp. 157–171). Stuttgart, Germany: Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart (OPUS).
Kamp, H., van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U. (2011). Discourse Representation Theory. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (pp. 125–394). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kenesei, I., Vágó, R. M., & Fenyvesi, A. (1998). Hungarian. London, UK: Routledge.
Kleiber, J., & Alberti, G. (2014). Uncertainty in Polar Questions and Certainty in Answers? In S. Cantarini, W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Certainty-uncertainty – and the attitudinal space in between. Studies in Language Companion Series 165 (pp. 135–152). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Kleiber, J., Alberti, G., & Szabó, V. (2016). The intensional profiles of five Hungarian imperative sentence types. Linguistica, 56(1), 161–172.
Lauer, S. (2013). Towards a dynamic pragmatics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Molnár, C. S. (2016). Ugye melyik szabály alól ne találnánk kivételt? Az ugye partikula előfordulása kiegészítendő kérdésekben [There is an exception to every rule, isn’t there? The distribution of the Hungarian particle ugye in wh-questions]. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat, 3, 151–167.
Oishi, E. (2014). Discursive functions of evidentials and epistemic modals. In S. Cantarini, W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Certainty-uncertainty – and the attitudinal space in between. Studies in Language Companion Series 165 (pp. 239–262). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Szeteli, A., & Alberti, G. (2017). Énszerintem, teszerinted ‘in my/your opinion’. Poster presented at the 2017 Debrecen Workshop on Pronouns. In Gy. Rákosi (Ed.), Book of Abstracts – DWP2017 (pp. 43–44). Debrecen, Hungary: Institute for English and American Studies.
Turi, G. (2009). Kötőmód a mai magyar nyelvben [The subjunctive in present-day Hungarian]. Argumentum, 5, 25–38.
Tóth, E. (2005). Az alárendelt mellékmondatbeli kötő-, ill. felszólító módról [On the subjunctive vs. imperative mood in subordinate clauses]. In: B. Sinkovics (Ed.), LingDok4 (pp. 175–193). Szeged, Hungary: University of Szeged.
Varga, D. (2013). A magyar felszólító mondatok szerkezete [The structure of Hungarian imperative sentences] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pázmány Péter University, Budapest, Hungary.
Varga, L. (1994). A hanglejtés [Intonation]. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 2. Fonológia [A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 2. Phonology] (pp. 468–549). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
