Verbal prefixation and realizations of antipassive alternations in Polish
Katarzyna Mroczyńska
Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-1056
Abstract
Various works on transitivity suggest that aspectual notions may constitute semantic determinants of argument realization. Observations included in these works prompted theories implying that argument realization may be aspectually driven. Following this line of thought, this article presents the results of corpus-based studies on antipassive structure in the Polish language and makes an attempt at confirming the fact that aspectual notion may determine argument realization.
The article consists of three main sections. The first one focuses on notions of aspect and various aspectual propositions distinguished in the literature on the subject, regarding the Polish language in particular. The second section, illustrated with examples extracted from the National Corpus of Polish (NKJP) and the corpus of Wielki Słownik Języka Polskiego (KWSJP), gives an overview of Polish perfectivizing verbal prefixes, i.e. a roz‑, na-, o-/ob- and u-prefix, and deals with the effect they may have on sentence structure and semantics. It also shows how the prefixed verbs combine with the marker się, which flags antipassive, i.e. is a recurring marker attested in antipassive constructions in the Polish language. In section three, an attempt is made at analyzing the interrelations between aspect and antipassive reading of a structure. As it seems that a perfective prefix used with a verb imposes certain requirements on the argument structure of the verb it combines with, we also offer a possible explanation to different aspectual requirements of verbs occurring in antipassive structures, assuming that projections coded in a verb may play a role here.
Keywords:
antipassive, aspect, Polish, prefixing, verb projectionsReferences
Bloch-Trojnar, M. (2015). Grammatical aspect and the lexical representation of Polish verbs. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 51(4), 487-510.
Centineo, G. (1986). A lexical theory of auxiliary selection in Italian. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1-35.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619.
Fellbaum, Ch. (1987). On nominals with preposed themes. Chicago Linguistic Society, 23, 79-92.
Gawrońska, B. (2001). PolVerbNet: An experimental database for Polish verbs. In J. Hutchins (Ed.), Proceedings of MT Summit VIII: Machine Translation in the Information Age, Santiago de Compostella (Spain), September 18 22, 2001. Retrieved from https://nats www.informatik.uni hamburg.de/intern/proceedings/2001/MTSUMMITVIII/ Gawronska.pdf.
Grzegorczykowa R., Laskowski R., & Wróbel H. (1999). Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia, 3rd edition, 151-224. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251-299.
Hout van, A. (1996). Event semantics of verb frame alternations. PhD dissertation. Tilburg University. Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Janic, K. (2013). L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation. Université Lumière Lyon 2. Lyon, France.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1977). Problème de linguistique Indo-Européenne. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Matthews, P. H. (2005). Oxford concise dictionary of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Medová, L. (2009). Reflexive markers in the Slavic and Romance languages. A comparative view from an antipassive perspective. PhD Dissertation. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Młynarczyk, A. (2004). Aspectual pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation. Utrecht University: Utrecht, the Netherlands. (Retrieved from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2004-0309-140804/inhoud.htm).
Mroczyńska K. (2015). On verb valency and the antipassive construction in the Polish language. In K. Kozak & A. Rzepkowska (Eds.), Forum for Contemporary Issues in Language and Literature vol. II From word to discourse. Siedlce, Wydawnictwo IKR[i]BL.
Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. (2012). A. Przepiórkowski, M., Bańko, R., Górski, and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. http://korpus/pl
Polinsky, M. (2005). Antipassive constructions. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil et al. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 438-439). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polinsky, M. (2017). Antipassive. In J. Coon, D. Massam & L. deMena Travis (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity (pp. 307-331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (Coll. Linguistic Series 22) (pp. 112-171). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Szymanek, B. (2010). A panorama of Polish word-formation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. PhD dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, USA.
Tenny, C. (1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66, 221-60.
Wielki słownik języka polskiego PAN, 2007. P. Żmigrodzki (Ed.), Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN, Kraków. http://www.wsjp.pl
Wierzbicka, A. (1967). On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To Honour Roman Jakobson. Vol. 3, 2231-2249. The Hague: Mouton.
Willim, E. (2006). Event, individuation and counatbility. A study with special reference to English and Polish. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.
Zaenen, A. (1993). Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), Semantics and the lexicon (pp. 129-161). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-1056
