Cognitive mechanisms and emergent grammatical features in Internet memes
Elke Diedrichsen
Institute of Technology, Blanchardstown, Dublin , IrelandAbstract
Internet memes of the type composed of an image macro and text, have a strong form-meaning correlation that is shared among users of social media. Their frequency of usage and the immediacy of their broad reach around the world make them an interesting field of investigation for linguistic studies. I will argue in this article that Internet memes resemble linguistic signs. Users develop a literacy, i.e. a command of their usage through convention and shared usage history. Popular Internet memes can be found in a multiplicity of variations, where details of the shown picture are changed, while the general mood or topic of the meme, mostly expressed in the caption, remains broadly the same. This article will discuss cases where the development of meme variations works along the lines of known cognitive mechanisms like metaphor and metonymy, and their prerequisites, like abstraction. Some meme variations can be represented as grammaticalisation paths that lead to the emergence of grammatical features like morphemes.
Keywords:
Internet memes, emergent grammar, grammaticalisation, metaphor, metonymyReferences
Blackmore, S. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cannizzarro, S. (2016). Internet Memes as Internet Signs: A Semiotic View of Digital Culture. Sign Systems Studies 44(4), 562–586.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diedrichsen, E. (2013a). Constructions as Memes – Interactional Function as Cultural Convention Beyond the Words. In Liedtke, F. & Schulze, C. (Eds.): Beyond Words (pp. 283–305). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Diedrichsen, E. (2013b). From Idioms to Sentence Structures and Beyond: The Theoretical Scope of the Concept ‘Construction’. In Nolan, B. & Diedrichsen, E. (Eds.): Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics – The Role of Constructions in Grammars (pp. 295–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diedrichsen, E. (forthcoming). On the Interaction of Core and Emergent Common Ground in Internet Memes. To appear in Internet Pragmatics, special issue on the Pragmatics of Internet Memes.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press.
Everett, D. (2012). Language, the cultural tool. London: Profile Books.
Feilke, H. (1996). Sprache als soziale Gestalt. Ausdruck, Prägung und die Ordnung der sprachlichen Typik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Feilke, H. (1998). Idiomatische Prägung. In Barz, I. & Öhlschläger, G. (Eds.): Zwischen Grammatik und Lexikon (pp. 69-80), Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Hopper, P. J. (2011). Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Auer, P. & Pfänder, S. (Eds.): Constructions: Emerging and Emergent (pp. 22–44) Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, Y. & Shifman, L. (2017). Making Sense? The Structure and Meanings of Digital Memetic Nonsense. Information Communication and Society 20 (6): 825–842. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291702
Kecskes, I. & Zhang, F. (2009). Activating, Seeking and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Pragmatics & Cognition 17, 2, 331–355.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion Concepts. New York: Springer.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Leeson, L. and Saeed, J. I. (2012). Irish Sign Language. A Cognitive Linguistic Account. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction, and Contexts in Dialogical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Milner, R. M. (2012). The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Paricipatory Media. PhD Dissertation, University of Kansas.
Miltner, K. (2014). ‘There’s No Place for Lulz on Lolcats’: The Role of Genre, Gender and Group Identity in the Interpretation and Enjoyment of an Internet Meme. First Monday, 19(8). doi:10.5210/fm. v19i8.5391.
Nissenbaum, A. & Shifman, L. (2015). Internet Memes as Contested Cultural Capital: The Case of 4chan’s B Board. new media & society, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1461444815609313.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18 (3), 362-377.
Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H-J. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London / New York: Longman.
Wittgenstein, L. (1960). Philosophische Untersuchungen. In: Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus (=Schriften 1), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
