« Les marques » de l’absence dans le théâtre de Maurice Maeterlinck

Eugenia Enache

Université Petru Maior , Roumanie


Résumé

Our approach is focused on the issue of the “markers” of absence as well as on the expression and materialization of that absence in a corpus of works formed of the following plays: L’Intruse, Les Aveugles, Intérieur by Maurice Maeterlinck.

The acceptions the concept of “absence” may receive throughout our analysis are parts of the phenomenon of progressive alienation seen, for instance, as separation (stressing the idea of distance and departure), or as solitude, then omission (in the sense of forgetting), and culminating with the inability of perception that anticipates isolation, physical imprisonment and announces death (designated through a privative prefix) as an absence that is always present and obscurity.

We attempt to reveal the “markers” of absence on the level of certain constituents of the play: the character, formed of a discursive feature, infinitely simple and repetitive, much more diminished and developing without individuality, like a silent, mysterious ghost; and the action where it is rather inaction that represents our primary direction of research. As a secondary direction, we consider the markers of absence in a language that, in the case of Maeterlinck, is remarkably pure and lacks any syntactic or lexical complication, from lexical structures (the reassessment of short expressions makes the utterances seem captivatingly strange, revealing, beyond words, unutterable, unspeakable) and the grammar, especially the semantics of its forms – the 3rd person pronouns, a form we may consider as deprived of referential content, the indefinite pronouns which indicate absence –, the semantics of punctuation, especially that of the suspension points.

Mots-clés :

absence, Maurice Maeterlinck, alienation, separation, death

Achard-Bayle G. 2001. Grammaire des métamorphoses. Bruxelles. Duculot (Champs linguistiques).

Artaud A. 1964. Le théâtre et son double. Paris. Gallimard (Folio. Essais).

Barthes R. 1963. Sur Racine. Paris. Seuil (Points. Essais).

Illouz J.-N. 2004. Le Symbolisme. Paris. Librairie Générale Française.

Larthomas P. 1980. Le langage dramatique. Paris. PUF.

Lioure M. 1973. Le Drame de Diderot à Ionesco. Paris. Armand Colin.

Maeterlinck M. 1997. Les Aveugles. Le trésor des humbles. In La Belgique fin de siècle, Romans-Nouvelles-Théâtre. Bruxelles. Éditions Complexe.

Maeterlinck M. 2005. Théâtre. L’Intruse et Intérieur. Genève. Slatkine.

Pavis P. 1980. Dictionnaire du théâtre. Paris. Éditions Sociales.

Riegel M., Pellat J.-C., Rioul R. 2004. Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris. PUF/Quadrige Manuels.

Robichez J. 1957. Le symbolisme au théâtre. Paris. L’Arche Éditeur (Références).

Rykner A. 1996. L’envers du théâtre. Dramaturgie du silence de l’âge classique à Maeterlinck. Paris. Librairie José Corti.

Théâtre. Modes d’approche. 1987. Bruxelles. Éditions Labor (Archives du futur).

Ubersfeld A. 1996. Lire le théâtre I-III. Paris. Belin (Belin Lettres Sup).
Download

Publié
2012-12-30


Enache, E. « « Les Marques » De l’absence Dans Le théâtre De Maurice Maeterlinck ». Quêtes littéraires, nᵒ 2, décembre 2012, p. 46-53, doi:10.31743/ql.4626.

Eugenia Enache  eugenia_enache@yahoo.fr
Université Petru Maior



Licence

Les articles de la revue sont mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Licence Agreement [EN]