Issue of the boundaries between good and evil in theological-moral discourse

René Balák

Slovenskí katolici , Słowacja
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-9910


Abstrakt

Hardly any problem in contemporary theological-moral discourse causes such turbulence as the searching, reflection, and demarcation of the boundaries between good and evil in human acting. A fundamental problem is a criterion or a reference point according to which a person could reliably determine what is good and evil. Divergent theological views in the theological-moral dimension seem to have caused the clear boundaries between good and evil to disappear. Therefore, the crucial question is whether there is still a universal criterion for theological evaluation of a human act, as the situation in theological-moral discourse resembles an areopagus of opinions that have no common point in distinguishing between good and evil. This reflection examines the possibility if the Thomistic ethical analysis of a human act, together with the principle of double effect, may be a reference point for the demarcation of these boundaries.

Słowa kluczowe:

good, evil, boundaries, conscience, ethical norm, moral theology, bioethics

R. Balák. Neverending History of the Use of Vaccines Derived from Aborted Infants. Part I: Critique of Teleological Proportionalism and Consequentialism from the Perspective of Moral Theology. In: “Roczniki Teologiczne” 64 (2017) Vol.3. pp.93 – 109.
W. Boloz Życie w ludzkich rękach. Warszawa: WAT 1997
John Paul II. Veritatis splendor. Vatican 1993
I. Kútny Svedomie v jeho špecifickosti. In: Špecifické aspekty svedomia v perspektíve rozvoja osoby a spoločnosti. Bratislava – Nitra: RKCMBF UK (2007) pp. 3-10.
W. E. May Double Effect. In: Encyclopedia of Bioethics. I. W. T. Reich. (Ed.) New York – London: Macmillan 1978 p. 316.
V. Mele Biotecnologie (Parte etica). In: Enciclopedia di bioetica e scienza giuridica II. E. Sgreccia – A. Tarantino (direzione di) Napoli: ESI 2009 pp. 309 - 317.
G. M. Miglietta – G. Russo Duplice effetto. In: Enciclopedia di bioetica e scienza giuridica IV. E. Sgreccia – A. Tarantino (direzione di) Napoli: ESI 2011 p.915.
S. Privitera Relativismo etico, oggettività e pluralismo. In: G. Russo. Ed. Bioetica fondamentale e generale. Torino: SEI 1995 pp. 56-61.
S. Privitera Duplice effetto. In: Dizionario di Bioetica. S. Leone – S. Privitera (a cura di), Palermo: EDB 1994 pp. 307 – 309.

M. Reichlin Bioethics in Italy: two reasons for dissatisfaction. 62 „Filozofia”, (2007) Vol. 3, pp. 255-261.

S. Rosik Wezwania i wybory moralne. Reflexie teologicznomoralne. Lublin: RW KUL 1992
G. Russo La bioetica in Italia. Le origini e le istituzioni. In: G. Russo. Ed. Bioetica fondomentale e generale. Torino: SEI 1995 pp. 409-420.
E. Sgreccia Manuale di Bioetica Vol I: Fondamenti ed etica biomedica. Milano: Vita e Pensiero 2007.
Pobierz

Opublikowane
2021-12-02


Balák, R. (2021). Issue of the boundaries between good and evil in theological-moral discourse. Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN, (16), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.31743/snt.12639