Interpretation of the Transfiguration of Jesus in the patristic era. Part 1: Pre-Nicene period

Miroslaw Mejzner

University of Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński, Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

The aim of the article is an analysis of the reflections on the Transfiguration of Jesus from the pre-Nicene period. The subjects of the research are not only the textual elements of evangelical pericopes from selected authors (gnostic and apocryphal authors, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Methodius of Olympus), but also the close connection between the theological problems of specific ideological circles and the interpretation of biblical texts. The following need to be included in the most important issues emanating from the exegesis of evangelical pericopes in the context of the polemic against the Gnostics: the unity of the Old and New Testament, the resurrection of the flesh, the immutability of the Christ’s nature.

Keywords:

Transfiguration of Jesus, unity of the Holy Scriptures, the resurrection of the flesh, Christ's Divinity, ascension, ascension of the moutain, Gnosticism

Acta Iohannis, CCSA 1, ed. E. Junod – J.-D. Kaestli, Turnhout 1983, s. 160-315, tł. M. Starowieyski, Dzieje Jana, w: Apokryfy Nowego Testamentu, t. 2/1: Apostołowie, red. M. Starowieyski, Kraków 2007, s. 293-338.

Acta Petri, TU 171, ed. M. Döhler, Berlin 2018, tł. Z. Izydorczyk – M. Bielewicz – W. Myszor, Dzieje Piotra, w: Apokryfy Nowego Testamentu, t. 2/1: Apostołowie, red. M. Starowieyski, Kraków 2007, s. 482-524.

Apocalypsis Petri, tł. M. Starowieyski – S. Kur, w: Apokryfy Nowego Testamentu, t. 3: Listy i apokalipsy chrześcijańskie, red. M. Starowieyski, Kraków 2005, s. 225-241.

Clemens Alexandrinus, Excerpta ex Theodoto, ed. F. Sagnard, SCh 23, Paris 1970, tł. P. Siejkowski, Klemens Aleksandryjski, Wypisy z Theodota, ŹMT 22, Kraków 2001.

Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromata, ed. O. Stählin, GCS 2-3, Berlin 1960-1970, tł. J. Niemirska-Pliszczyńska, Klemens Aleksandryjski, Kobierce zapisków filozoficznych dotyczących prawdziwej wiedzy, Warszawa 1994.

Epistula ad Rheginus, Nag Hammadi Codex I 4, 43-50, tł. W. Myszor, Wypowiedź o zmartwychwstaniu [List do Rheginosa], w: Biblioteka z Nag Hammadi. Kodeksy I i II, Katowice 2008, s. 80-82.

Evangelium Philippi, Nag Hammadi Codex II 3, 51-89, tł. W. Myszor, Ewangelia Filipa, w: Biblioteka z Nag Hammadi. Kodeksy I i II, Katowice 2008, s. 231-257.

Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, ed. A. Rousseau – L. Doutreleau, t, 1, SCh 263-264; t. 2, SCh 293-294; t. 3, SCh 210-211; t. 4, SCh 100; t. 5, SCh 152-153, Paris 1965-1982, tł. J. Brylowski, Św. Ireneusz z Lyonu, Adversus haereses, Pelplin 2018.

Methodius, De resurrectione, ed. G.N. Bonwetsch, GCS 27, Leipzig 1917, s. 217-424, tł. M. Mejzner – B.S. Zorzi, Metodio di Olimpo, La risurrezione, TP 216, Roma 2010.

Origenes, Commentarium in evangelium Matthaei, ed. G. Bendinelli, Opere di Origene XI/1-2, Roma 2008-2012, tł. K. Augustyniak, Orygenes, Komentarz do Ewangelii Mateusza, ŹMT 10, Kraków 1998.

Origenes, Contra Celsum, ed. M. Borret, SCh 147, Paris 1969, tł. S. Kalinkowski, Orygenes, Przeciw Celsusowi, Warszawa 1986.

Origenes, De principiis, ed. H. Crouzel – M. Simonetti, SCh 252-253, 268-269, Paris 1978-1980, tł. S. Kalinkowski, Orygenes, O zasadach, ŹMT 1, Kraków 1996.

Apokryfy Nowego Testamentu, t. 2/1: Apostołowie, red. M. Starowieyski, Kraków 2007.

Apokryfy Nowego Testamentu, t. 3: Listy i apokalipsy chrześcijańskie, red. M. Starowieyski, Kraków 2005.

Cantalamessa R., Tajemnica Przemienienia, Kraków 2002.

Cerami C., La Trasfigurazione del Signore nei Padri della Chiesa, Roma 2010.

Clark E.A., The Origenist Controversy. The Cultural Construction of an Early Christian Debate, Princeton 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400863112

Coune M., Joie de la transfiguration d’après les Pères d’Orient, Abbaye de Bellafontaine 1985.

Crouzel H., Les critiques adressées par Méthode d’Olympe et ses contemporains à la doctrine origenienne du corps ressuscité, „Gregorianum” 53 (1972) s. 679-716.

Dorival G., Origène et la résurrection de la chair, Origeniana quarta, ed. L. Lies, Innsbruck – Wien 1987, s. 291-321.

Habra G., La transfiguration selon les Pères grecs, Paris 1973.

Heil J.P., The Transfiguration of Jesus, Analecta Biblica 144, Roma 2000.

Malina A., Przemienienie Jezusa: studium narracji i teologii tekstów Nowego Testamentu, Tarnów 2016.

McGuckin J.A., The Patristic Exegesis of the Transfiguration, Studia Patristica 18/1, red. E.A. Livingstone, Michigan 1985, s. 335-341.

McGuckin J.A., The Transfiguration of Christ in Scripture and Tradition, New York 1987.

Mejzner M., Duszpasterskie motywacje „De resurrectione” Metodego z Olimpu, w: Problemy duszpasterskie starożytnego Kościoła, red. P. Szczur i in., Lublin 2009, s. 25-47.

Mejzner M., L’escatologia di Metodio di Olimpo, SEA 124, Roma 2011.

Ménard J.E., Transfiguration et polymorphie chez Origène, w: Epektasis. Mélanges patristiques offerts à J. Daniélou, red. C. Kannengiesser – J. Fontaine, Paris 1972, s. 367-383.

Noce C., Vestis varia. L’immagine della veste nell’opera di Origene, SEA 79, Roma 2002.

Prinzivalli E., Magister Ecclesiae. Il dibattito su Origene fra III e IV secolo, SEA 82, Roma 2002.

Scholten C., Ein unerkannter quaestioneskommentar (Exc. Theod. 4F) und die deutung der verklärung Christi in Frühchristlichen texten, „Vigiliae Christianae” 57/4 (2003) s. 398-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007203772064577

Simonetti M., Alcune antiche interpretazioni della trasfigurazione (Mc 9,2-9), „Studi e materiali di Storia delle religioni” 62 (1996) s. 599-608.

Simonetti M., Między dosłownością a alegorią, tł. T. Skibiński, Kraków 2000.

Szram M., Chrystus – Mądrość Boża według Orygenesa, Lublin 1997.

Szram M., Ciało zmartwychwstałe w myśli patrystycznej przełomu II i III wieku, Lublin 2010.

Zorzi B., Desiderio di bellezza. Da Platone a Gregorio di Nissa: Tracce di una rifrazione teologico-semantica, Studia Anselmiana 145, Roma 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/agstm200848228


Published
2021-09-15


Mejzner, M. (2021). Interpretation of the Transfiguration of Jesus in the patristic era. Part 1: Pre-Nicene period. Vox Patrum, 79, 277–298. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.12657

Miroslaw Mejzner  m.mejzner@uksw.edu.pl
University of Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński, Warsaw https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-4620



License

Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants the Publisher of the journal "Vox Patrum" a non-exclusive and free license to use the Work submitted for publication for an indefinite period of time on an unlimited territory in the following fields of use:
a. In the field of recording and reproducing the work - producing copies of the work using a specific technique, including printing, reprographic, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b. Within the scope of trading in the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - marketing, lending or renting the original or copies;
c. In the scope of disseminating the work in a manner other than specified in point b - public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, as well as making the work available to the public, so that everyone can have access to it at a place and time chosen by them.
Moreover, the Author allows the Publisher free of charge to use and dispose of the compilations of the Works.
The publisher may grant sub-licenses.
Third parties may use the Works and other materials containing or based on the Works in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (also known as CC-BY-NC 4.0) license pattern.