The Structure of Noah’s Ark (Gen 6:14-16) in Latin Patristic Sources before Augustine of Hippo

Piotr Kochanek

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin,John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin image/svg+xml , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-548X


Abstract

The article analyzes the comments of eleven Latin authors on the structure of Noah’s Ark (Genesis 6:14-16). These authors are: Tertullian, Cyprian, Pseudo-Cyprian, Victorinus of Patavia, Lactantius, Hilary of Poitiers, Gregory of Elvira, Ambrose of Milan, Maximus of Turin, Jerome of Strydon and Orosius. The most important points in their analyzes of the flood pericope were three typologies: Noah – Christ, Noah’s ark – the Church of Christ, the waters of the flood – the water of baptism. These typologies were closely related to the thesis regarding the exclusivity of salvation in the Church. The structure of the ark was a secondary or even tertiary problem in this context. However, over time, interest in this issue also gained attention. Gregory of Elvira and Ambrose of Milan paid the most attention to the „technical” structure of the Ark. A translation of Origen’s Second Homily on the Book of Genesis by Rufinus of Aquileia should be added here. These writers drew attention to the pyramidal shape of Noah’s Ark and the two-stage division of its interior: storeys and floors. The symbolic meaning of the dimensions of the Ark was also analyzed. The Ark-Church typology has also been linked to considerations on the Church as the mystical body of Christ. In this way, Latin theologians, even before the translation of Origen’s homily by Rufinus, either adopted the ideas of the Greek Fathers of the Church or reached the same conclusions themselves.

Keywords:

Noak's Ark, biblical typology, Latin Fathers of the Church, Gen 6:14-16



Ambrosius, De Noe, ed. C. Schenkl, Ambrosius, Opera, t. 1, CSEL 32, Pragae – Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1896, s. 413‑497 (= PL 14, 361A-416D).

Ambrosius, Expositio Evangelii secundum Lucam, PL 15, 1527A-1850D.

Biblia pierwszego Kościoła, tł. R. Popowski, Prymasowska Seria Biblijna 43, Warszawa 2016.

Clemens Alexandrinus, [Werke], t. 2: Stromata, z. 1‑6, ed. O. Stählin, GCS 15, Leipzig 1906 (= SCh 30, 38, 278, 279, 446, 463 = PG 8, 685A-1381B i PG 9, 9A-401A).

Cyprianus, De Catholicae Ecclesiae unitate, ed. G. Hartel, Cyprianus, Opera omnia, CSEL 3/1, Vindobonae 1868, s. 209,1‑233,15 (= CCL 3, s. 249‑268 = SCh 500 = PL 4, 493D-520A).

Cyprianus, Epistulae, ed. G. Hartel, CSEL 3/2, Vindobonae 1871.

Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus, Catecheses, PG 33, 332A-1060A.

Gregorius Iliberritanus, De arca Noe, ed. V. Bulhart, Gregorius Iliberritanus, Quae superunt, CCL 69, Turnholti 1967, s. 149‑155.

Hieronymus, Adversus Iovinianum, PL 23, 211A-3338B.

Hieronymus, Altercatio Luciferi et Orthodoxi, ed. A. Canellis, CCL 79B, Turnhout 2000 (= SCh 473 = PL 23, 155A-182B).

Hieronymus, Epistulae, t 3: Epistulae CXXI-CLIV, ed. I. Hilberg, CSEL 56, Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1918 (por. PL 22, 1006‑1224).

Hilarius Pictaviensis, Tractatus mysteriorum, ed. A. Feder, Hilarius Pictaviensis, Opera, t. 4, CSEL 65, Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1916, s. 3, 1‑38, 3 (= SCh 19bis).

Hilarius Pictaviensis, Tractatus super Psalmos, ed. A. Zingerle, CSEL 22, Pragae – Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1891 (= PL 9, 231C-890A).

Irenaeus Lugdunensis, Adversus haereses, w: Irénée de Lyon, Contre les hérésies. Livre IV, ed. A. Rousseau, t. 2: Texte et traduction, SCh 100/2, Paris 1965 (= PG 7, 973A-1118B).

Iustinus Martyr, Dialogus cum Tryphone Iudaeo 138, ed. I.C.Th. Otto, Corpus Apologetarum Christianorum 1/2, Wiesbaden 1969 (= PG 6, 472A-800D).

Lactantius, Divinae institutiones, ed. S. Brandt, w: Lactantius, Opera omnia, CSEL 19, ed. S. Brandt – G. Laubmann, Pragae – Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1890, s. 1‑672 (= SCh 204‑205, 326, 337, 377 = PL 6, 111A-822A).

Maximus Tauronensis, Sermones, PL 57, 531A-760B.

Origenes, Homiliae in Genesim, w: Origène, Homélies sur la Genèse, ed. H. de Lubac – L. Doutreleau, SCh 7bis, Paris 1976.

Origenes, Homiliae in Librum Jesu Nave, ed. W.A. Baehrens, Origenes, Werke, t. 7: Homilien zum Hexateuch in Rufins Übersetzung, z. 2: Die Homilien zu Numeri, Josua und Judices, GCS 30, Leipzig 1921, s. 286, 2‑463, 16 (= SCh 71 = PG 12, 825A-948C).

Origenes, Homilia II in Genesim, ed. W.A. Baehrens, Origenes, Werke, t. 6: Homilien zum Hexateuch in Rufins Übersetzung, z. 1: Die Homilien zu Genesis, Exodus und Leviticus, GCS 29, Leipzig 1920, s. 22, 15‑39, 3 (por. PG 12, 161A-175A).

Orosius, Historia adversum paganos, ed. C. Zangemeister, CSEL 5, Vindobonae 1882 (= PL 31, 663B-1174B).

Procopius Gazaeus, Commentarii in Genesim, w: Prokop von Gaza, Eclogarum in libros historicos Veteris Testamenti epitome, t. 1: Der Genesiskommentar, ed. K. Metzler, GCS N.F. 22, Berlin – München – Boston 2015 (por. PG 87, 21A-512C). (Crossref)

Pseudo-Cyprianus, Ad Novatianum, ed. G. Hartel, Cyprianus, Opera spuria, CSEL 3/3, Vindobonae 1871, s. 52,8‑69,9 (= CCL 4, s. 137‑152 = PL 4, 1205D-1218C).

Rufinus Aquileiensis, De benedictionibus patriarcharum, PL 21, 295‑336A.

Septuaginta. Id est Vetus Testamentum graece iuxta LXX interpretes, ed. A. Rahlfs, Stuttgart 1979.

Tertullianus, De baptismo, ed. A. Reifferscheid – G. Wissowa, Tertullianus, Opera, t. 1, CSEL 20, Pragae – Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1890, s. 201‑218 (= SCh 35 = CCL 1, s. 277‑295 = PL 1, 1197A-1224B).

Tertullianus, De idololatria, ed. A. Reifferscheid – G. Wissowa, Tertullianus, Opera, t. 1, CSEL 20, Pragae – Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1890, s. 30‑58 (= CCL 1, s. 1101‑1124 = PL 1, 661D-696B).

Theophilus Antiochenus, Ad Autolycum, w: Théophile d’Antioche, Trois livres à Autolycus, tł. J. Sender, SCh 20, Paris 1948 (= PG 6, 1024B-1168A).

Vetus Latina. Die Reste der altlateinischen Bibel, t. 2: Genesis, ed. B. Fischer, Freiburg 1954.

Victorinus Petavionensis, Commentarii in Apocalypsin editio Victorini et recensio Hieronymi vna cvm posteriorvm additamentis, ed. I. Havssleiter, Victorinus Petavionensis, Opera, CSEL 49, Vindobonae – Lipsiae 1916, s. 14‑154 (= SCh 423, s. 46‑130; por. PL 5, 317A-344C).

Buckley F.J., Christ and the Church according to Gregory of Elvira, Rome 1964.

Congar Y., Czy poza Kościołem nie ma zbawienia?, w: Y. Congar, Szeroki świat moją parafią. Wymiary i prawdy zbawienia, tł. A. Turowiczowa, Kraków 2002, s. 127‑203.

Costa F., Le Christ, clef de l’interprétation de l’Écriture: Aspects de la typologie de Jean Daniélou, „Revista de Magistro de Filosofia” 10/22 (2017) s. 81‑93.

Daniélou J., Bible et liturgie. La théologie biblique des Sacrements et des fêtes d’après les Pères de l’Église, Lex Orandi 11, Paris 1951.

Dołganiszewska E., „Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus”. Cypriana z Kartaginy myśli o Kościele, „Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny” 14/1 (2006) s. 141‑157.

Dulaey M., Le „De arca” de Grégoire d’Elvire et la tradition exégètique ancienne, „Graphè” 15 (2006) s. 79‑102.

Elfering L.J., Hooge huizen in de Oudheid, „Neophilogus” 17 (1932) s. 49‑57. (Crossref)

Hanson R.P.C., Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origin’s Interpretation of Scripture, Louisville – London 2002.

Koch H., Cyprianische Untersuchungen, Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 4, Bonn 1926. (Crossref)

Kowalczyk P., Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. Obraz heretyka w nowożytnych przedstawieniach okrętu Kościoła Katolickiego, w: Figura heretyka w nowożytnych sporach konfesyjnych, red. A. Bielak – W. Kordyzon, Warszawa 2017, s. 181‑209.

Ledwoń I., Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, w: Leksykon teologii fundamentalnej, red. M. Rusecki – K. Kaucha – I. Ledwoń – J. Mastej, Lublin – Kraków 2002, s. 389‑395.

Ledwoń I., „Extra Ecclesiam salus nulla”, „Studia Salvatoriana Polonica” 3 (2009) s. 57‑74.

Longchamps de Bérier F., Czy poza Kościołam nie ma zbawienia?, Kraków – Tyniec 2004.

Morgan J.J., Chaucer and the Bona Matrimonii, „The Chaucer Review” 4/2 (1969) s. 123‑141.

Pietras H., Wprowadzenie, w: Orygenes, Homilie o Księdze Rodzaju. Homilie o Księdze Wyjścia, tł. S. Kalinkowski, ŹMT 64, Kraków 2012, s. 5‑15.

Ratzinger J., Salus extra Ecclesiam nulla est, tł. AM, „Znak” 17/131 (1965) s. 611‑618.

Rönsch H., Itala und Vulgata. Das Sprachidiom der urchristlichen Itala und der katholischen Vulgata unter Berücksichtigung der römischen Volkssprache, Marburg – Leipzig 1869.

Rönsch H., Lexikalisches aus Leidener lateinischen Juvenalscholien der Karolingerzeit, „Romanische Forschungen” 2/2 (1886) s. 302‑313.

Sesboüé B., Poza Kościołem nie ma zbawienia. Historia formuły i problemy interpretacji, tł. A. Kuryś, Alfa – Omega, Poznań 2007.

Śliwiński A., Extra Ecclesiam salus nulla, w: Encyklopedia Katolicka, t. 4, Lublin 1995, k. 1474.

Wilmart A., Arca Noe, „Revue Bénédictine” 26 (1909) s. 1‑12. (Crossref)

Żochowska E., Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. Wiele interpretacji, jedna ortodoksja, „Christianitas” 31‑32 (2007) s. 199‑208.


Published
2024-09-16


Kochanek, P. (2024). Struktura arki Noego (Rdz 6,14-16) w łacińskich źródłach patrystycznych przed Augustynem z Hippony. Vox Patrum, 91, 321–340. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.17433

Piotr Kochanek  lu2005harn@yahoo.de
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin,John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-548X



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Papers published in Vox Patrum are covered by the Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) licence. Authors and users can use published works licensed under the CC-BY-ND since 2018. For earlier publications, copyrights are available under fair use rights in accordance with the Act of February 4, 1994 on copyrights and related rights.