Empress Eudoxia in the Light of the 5th-Century Ecclesiastical Histories

Sławomir Bralewski

University of Łódź , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-0103


Abstract

In the dispute between John Chrysostom, Bishop of Constantinople, and the imperial court the main role is generally attributed to Empress Eudoxia, who was blamed for causing his exile. How did the authors of Ecclesiastical histories, writing in the first half of the 5th century, perceive this empress? The first of them, Philostorgius, clearly suggested that although initially the status of Eudoxia at the imperial court was not strong because of her barbaric origin, the empress - wielding her femininity as a powerful weapon—not only managed to defend herself but also strengthened her position in the courtly environment by plunging her opponents into utter powerlessness. As for Theodoret, this historian refused to disclose the names of those guilty of John Chrysostom’s fate. He also did not attribute intentional guilt to the imperial couple, considering that their guilt was unintentional. He suggested, however, that Eudoxia's influence at the imperial court was so great that if she wanted, she could have John return from the exile. In the case of Socrates and Sozomen, both historians, although they differed in their assessment of John Chrysostom, showed a remarkable convergence of views in the case of empress Eudoxia. They both described her with a clear restraint, pointing to her great emotionality, but the responsibility for the conflict with John they blamed mainly on the bishop’s enemies, who set the ruler against him.

Keywords:

Empress, Eudoxia, Ecclesiastical histories, John Chrysostom

Ioannes Chrysostomos, Epistula ad Innocentium papam, in: Palladios, Dialogue sur la vie de Jean Chrysostome, t. 2, ed. A.-M. Malingrey – Ph. Leclerque, Paris 1988, p. 68-95.

Ioannes Chrysostomos, In decollationem Iochannis, PG 59, 485-490.

Marcus Diaconus, Vita Porphyrii, transl. H. Grégoire – M.-A. Kugener, Marc le Diacre, Vie de Porphyre évéque de Gaza, Paris 1930.

Martyrius Antiochenus, Oratio funebris in laudem sancti Iohannis Chrysostomi, ed. M. Wallraff – C. Ricci, BHG 871, Spoleto 2007.

Palladius, Dialogus de vita s. Iochannis Chrysostomi, t. 1, ed. A.-M. Malingrey, Sources Chrétiennes 341, Paris 1988.

Philostorgius, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. I. Bidez – F. Winkelmann, Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftseller 21, Berlin 1981, transl. Philostorgios, Kirchengeschichte, v. 1, ed. B. Bleckmann – M. Stein, Paderborn 2015.

Photius, Bibliotheca, t. 1, ed. R. Henry, Paris 1959.

Socrates, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. G.C. Hansen, Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftseller, Neue Folge 1, Berlin 1995.

Sozomenus, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. I. Bidez – G.Ch. Hansen, Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftseller, Neue Folge 4, Berlin 1995.

Theodoretus, Historia ecclesiastica, w: Theodoret, Kirchengeschichte, ed. L. Parmentier – G.Ch. Hansen, Berlin – New York 2009.

Zosimus, Historia nova, t. I-III, ed. F. Paschoud, Paris 1979-2000.

Andrade N., The Processions of John Chrysostom and the Contested Spaces of Constantinople, JECS 18 (2010) p. 161-189. (Crossref)

Argov E.I., Giving the Heretic a Voice: Philostorgius of Borissus and Greek ecclesiastical historiography, “Athenaeum” 89 (2001) p. 497-524.

Aubineau M., Un traité inédit de christologie de Sévérien de Gabala “in Centurionem et contra Manichaeos et Apollinaristas”. Exploitation par Sévère d’Antioche (519) et le synode de latran (649), Cahiers d’Orientalisme 5, Genève 1983, p. 11-24.

Barnes T.D., The Baptism of Theodose II, StPatr 19 (1989) p. 8-12.

Baur Ch., Der heilige Johannes Chrysostomus und seine Zeit, v. 2, Munich 1930.

Bralewski S., Rozbieżności w ocenie Jana Chryzostoma w relacjach Sokratesa i Hermiasza Sozomena, in: Cesarstwo Bizantyńskie. Dzieje, religia, kultura. Studia ofiarowane Profesorowi Waldemarowi Ceranowi przez uczniów na 70-lecie Jego urodzin, ed. P. Krupczyński – M.J. Leszka, Łask – Łódź 2006, p. 9-24.

Brottier L., L’impératrice Eudoxie et ses enfants, RevSR 70 (1996) p. 313-332. (Crossref)

Dagron G., Naissance d’une capitale. Constantinople et ses institutions de 330 à 451, Paris 1974.

Filipczak P., Prefekci Konstantynopola wobec niepokojów społecznych związanych z wygnaniem Jana Chryzostoma (403 i 404 r.), “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Follia Historica” 87 (2011) p. 57-62.

Grégoire H. – Kugener M.A., Quand est né l’empereur Théodose II?, “Byzantion” 4 (1927-1928) p. 337-348.

Gregory T.E., Zosimus 5, 23 and the People of Constantinople, “Byzantion” 43 (1973) p. 61-83.

Holum K.G., Theodosian Empress. Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity, Berkeley – Los Angeles 1982.

Ilski K., Sprowadzenie relikwii Jana Chryzostoma do Konstantynopola, in: Czasy Jana Chryzostoma i jego pasterska pedagogia, ed. N. Widok, Opole 2008, p. 137-152.

Jacobs A.S., Epiphanius of Cyprus: A Cultural Biography of Late Antiquity, Oakland 2016. (Crossref)

Kelly J.N.D., Złote usta. Jan Chryzostom – asceta, kaznodzieja, biskup, transl. K. Krakowczyk, Bydgoszcz 2001.

Leppin H., The Church Historians (I): Socrates, Sozomenus, and Theodoretus, in: Greek and Roman historiography in late antiquity: fourth to sixth century A.D., ed. G. Marasco, Leiden – Boston 2003, p. 219-256. (Crossref)

Leppin H., Von Constantin dem Grossen zu Theodosius II. Das christliche Kaisertum bei den Kirchenhistorikern Socrates, Sozomenus und Theodoret, Göttingen 1996. (Crossref)

Liebeschuetz J.H.W.G., Barbarians and Bishops. Army, Church, and State in the Age of Arcadius and Chrysostom, Oxford 1992.

Liebeschuetz J.H.W.G., The Fall of John Chrysostom, “Notthingam Medieval Studies” 29 (1985) p. 1-31. (Crossref)

Lippold A., Theodosius II, in: Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplementband XIII, Stuttgart 1973, p. 962-963.

Marasco G., The Church Historians (II): Philostorgius and Gelasius of Cyzicus, in: Greek and Roman historiography in late antiquity: fourth to sixth century A.D., ed. G. Marasco, Leiden – Boston 2003, p. 257-288. (Crossref)

Mayer W., Doing Violence to the Image of an Empress: The Destruction of Eudoxia’s Reputation, in: Violence in Late Antiquity. Perceptions and Practice, ed. H.A. Drake, Aldershot – Burlibgton 2006, p. 205-213.

Milewski I., Jan Chryzostom i jego stronnicy w starciu z patriarchą aleksandryjskim Teofilem, in: Czasy Jana Chryzostoma i jego pasterska pedagogia, ed. N. Widok, Opole 2008 p. 87-114.

Nuffelen P. van, Playing the Ritual Game in Constantinople (379-457), in: Two Romes. Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity, ed. L. Grig – G. Kelly, Oxford 2012, p. 181-200.

Nuffelen P. van, Palladius and the Johannite Schism, JEH 64 (2013) p. 1-19. (Crossref)

Nuffelen P. Van, Theophilus against John Chrysostom: the fragments of a lost liber and the reasons for John’s deposition, „Adamantius” 19 (2013) p. 139-155.

Nuffelen P. van, Un héritage de paix et de piété. Étude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène, Leuven – Paris – Dudley 2004.

Ommeslaeghe F. van, Jean Chrysostome en conflict avec l’imperatrice Eudoxie. Le dossier et les origines d’une legende, AnBol 97 (1979) p. 131-159. (Crossref)

Salamon M., Jan Chryzostom i Goci w Konstantynopolu, in: Czasy Jana Chryzostoma i jego pasterska pedagogia, ed. N. Widok, Opole 2008, p. 245-266.

Stachura M., Zwolennicy zesłanego biskupa Jana Chryzostoma w oczach rzymskiego wymiaru sprawiedliwości, in: Czasy Jana Chryzostoma i jego pasterska pedagogia, ed. N. Widok, Opole 2008, p. 117-135.

Stebnicka K., Jezabel i Eudoksja. Dwie królowe. Przyczynek do dziejów Jana Chryzostoma z cesarzową Eudoksją, „U schyłku starożytności” 8 (2009) p. 149-173.

Synek E.M., Frauen als Akteurinnen von Kirchengeschichte. Eine Case-Study zu Sturz und Rehabilitation des Johannes Chrysostomus, „Ostkirchliche Studien” 64 (2015) p. 148-169.

The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, v. 1, ed. A.H.M. Jones – J.R. Martindale – J. Morris, Cambridge 1971.

Tiersch C., Johannes Chrysostomus in Konstantinopel (398–404). Weltsicht und Wirken eines Bischofs in der Hauptstadt des Oströmischen Reiches, Tübingen 2002.

Urbainczyk T., Observations on the Differences between the Church Histories of Socrates and Sozomen, „Historia” 46 (1997) p. 355-373.

Wallraf M., Le conflit de Jean Chrysostome avec la cour chez les historiens ecclésiastique grecs, in: L’Historiographie de l’Église des premiers siècles, ed. B. Pouderon – Y.-M. Duval, Paris 2001, p. 361-370.

Download

Published
2020-09-15


Bralewski, S. (2020). Empress Eudoxia in the Light of the 5th-Century Ecclesiastical Histories. Vox Patrum, 75, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.4953

Sławomir Bralewski  s.bralewski@o2.pl
University of Łódź https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-0103



License

Papers published in Vox Patrum are covered by the Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) licence. Authors and users can use published works licensed under the CC-BY-ND since 2018. For earlier publications, copyrights are available under fair use rights in accordance with the Act of February 4, 1994 on copyrights and related rights.