John Chrysostom 'On the Incomprehensible Nature of God' – The Simpler Way of Presenting Complex Theological and Philosophical Issues
Abstrakt
The purpose of this paper is to indicate how, that is, with the help of which means, Chrysostom in his five homilies “On the Incomprehensible Nature of God” introduces his community in Antioch to the intricacies of the dispute with the Anomoeans, as far as the possibility of knowing God and his essence are concerned. The main differences between those texts and other fundamental polemical sources with Eunomius will also be taken under consideration. John uses both biblical and philosophical terms to underline the negative aspect of theology and his five homilies are not so theologically and philosophically sophisticated as Basil’s or Gregory’s texts, unlike even Gregory of Nazianzus, whose Orations, have a similar overall message. John uses methods adequate to accomplish his goal, which is to preserve the orthodox concept and unify the Antiochian Church.
Słowa kluczowe:
John Chrysostom, Anomeans, incomprehensibility of God, EunomiusBibliografia
Basilius Caesariensis, Adversus Eunomium, ed. B. Sesboüé, SCh 299, 305, Paris 1982-1983.
Eunomius, Liber apologeticus, ed. R.P. Vaggione, Eunomius. The extant works, Oxford 1987, p. 34-74.
Eunomius, Expositio fidei, ed. R.P. Vaggione, Eunomius. The extant works, Oxford 1987, p. 150-158.
Eunomius, Fragmenta, ed. R.P. Vaggione, Eunomius. The extant works, Oxford 1987, p. 176-178.
Eusebius, Praeparatio evangelica, ed. K. Mras, Eusebius Werke, v. 8: Die Praeparatio evangelica, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 43/1-2, Berlin 1954, p. 3-613; 3-426.
Gregorius Nazianzenus, Adversus Eunomianos (orat. 27), ed. J. Barbel, Gregor von Nazianz. Die fünf theologischen Reden, Düsseldorf 1963, p. 38-60.
Gregorius Nazianzenus, De dogmate et constitutione Episcoporum (orat. 20), PG 35, 1065-1080.
Gregorius Nazianzenus, De filio (orat. 30), ed. J. Barbel, Gregor von Nazianz. Die fünf theologischen Reden, Düsseldorf 1963, p. 170-216.
Gregorius Nazianzenus, De theologia (orat. 28), ed. J. Barbel, Gregor von Nazianz. Die fünf theologischen Reden, Düsseldorf 1963, p. 62-126.
Gregorius Nyssenus, Contra Eunomium, ed. W. Jaeger, in: Gregorii Nysseni opera, v. 1/1 and 2/2, Leiden 1960, p. 3-409; 3-311.
Gregorius Nyssenus, Refutatio confessionis Eunomii, ed. W. Jaeger, in: Gregorii Nysseni opera, v. 2/2, Leiden 1960, p. 312-410.
Joannas Chrysostomos, De incomprehensibili Dei natura (I-V), ed. A.-M. Malingrey, SCh 28 bis, Paris 1970, tr. P.W. Harkins, St. John Chrysostom, On the Incomprehensible Nature of God, Washington 1984, p. 51-163.
Joannas Chrysostomos, De incomprehensibili Dei natura (VI-XII), PG 48, 747-812, tr. P.W. Harkins, St. John Chrysostom, On the Incomprehensible Nature of God, Washington 1984, p. 164-307.
Barnes M.R., The Background and Use of Eunomius’ Causal Language, in: Arianism after Arius, ed. M.R. Barnes – D.H. Williams, Edinburgh 1993, p. 217-236.
Beeley Ch.A., Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God. In Your Light We Shall See Light, Oxford 2008. (Crossref)
Birjukov D., Strategies of Naming in the Polemic between Eunomius and Basil of Cesarea in the Context of the Philosophical Tradition of Antiquity, “Scrinium” 4 (2008) p. 104-121. (Crossref)
Carabine D., The Unknown God. Negative Theology in the Platonic Tradition: Plato to Eriugena, Eugene 1995.
Daniélou J., Introduction, in: Jean Chrysostome, Sur l’incompréhensibilité de Dieu, SCh 28 bis, Paris 1970, p. 9-89.
Daniélou J., Platonism et théologie mystique, Paris 1953.
Del Cogliano M., Basil of Caesarea’s Anti-Eunomian Theory of Names, Leiden – Boston 2010. (Crossref)
Hanson R.P.C., The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God. The Arian Controversy, 318–381, Grand Rapids 2005.
Harkins P.W., Introduction, in: St. John Chrysostom, On the Incomprehensible Nature of God, Washington 1984, p. 3-47.
Hildebrand S.M., A Reconsideration of the Development of Basil’s Trinitarian Theology. The Dating of ‘Ep. 9’ and ‘Contra Eunomium’, “Vigiliae Christianae” 59 (2004) p. 393-406. (Crossref)
Kopecek T.A., A history of neo-arianism, Cambridge 1979.
Lienhard T.J, Ousia and Hypostasis: The Cappadocian Settlement and the Theology of ‘One Hypostasis’, in: The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity, ed. S.T. Davis et al., Oxford, 2000, p. 99-121. (Crossref)
Maspero G., Trinity and Man. Gregory of Nyssa “Ad Ablabium”, Leiden – Boston 2007. (Crossref)
Meredith A., Studies in the Contra Eunomium of Gregory or Nyssa, Oxford 1972.
Przyszychowska M., Historia sporu eunomiańskiego, in: Eunomiusz i jego adwersarze, v. 1, ed. K. Kochańczyk-Bonińska – M. Przyszychowska – T. Stępień, v. 1, Warszawa 2021, p. 15-49.
Radde-Gallwitz A., Basil of Cesarea, Gregory of Nyssa and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity, Oxford 2009. (Crossref)
Robertson D.G., A Patristic Theory of Proper Names, “Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie” 84 (2002) p. 1-19. (Crossref)
Stępień T. – Kochańczyk-Bonińska K., Unknown God, Known in His Activities Incomprehensibility of God during the Trinitarian Controversy of the 4th Century, Berlin 2018. (Crossref)
Vaggione R.P., General Introduction, in: Eunomius, The extant works, Oxford 1987, p. XII-XVII.
Zachhuber J., The Rise of Christian Theology and the End of Ancient Metaphysic. Patristic Philosophy from the Cappadocian Fathers to John of Damascus, Oxford 2020. (Crossref)
Uniwersytet Warszawski https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-6111
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Artykuły w czasopiśmie objęte są licencją Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Autorzy i użytkownicy mogą korzystać z utworów na licencji CC-BY-ND od roku 2018. Dla wcześniejszych publikacji prawa autorskie są udostępnione na prawach dozwolonego użytku zgodnie z zapisami Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.
