Judas or Jesus’ Other Disciples? The Old Testament or Jesus’ Word? A Mysterious Reference to the “Scripture” in John 17:12


Abstrakt

The fulfillment of “the Scriptures” in John 17:12 has long been a bone of contention among commentators on the Fourth Gospel. The majority of authors have argued that ἡ γραφή unmistakably refers to a passage in the Hebrew Bible. Wendy Sproston (North) and Francis Moloney, however, picking up on an earlier observation by Edwin Freed, suggest Jesus’ own words as a more appropriate referent of ἡ γραφή in this verse. The issue of the correct scriptural referent is intrinsically connected with the question of the thematic referent within the verse in question. As it turns out, the fulfillment of the scripture can refer to either the tragic fate of Judas or the preserving of Jesus’ other disciples. The article surveys recent scholarship on these issues in order to identify the most convincing solutions.


Słowa kluczowe

The Gospel of John; John 17:12; Judas Iscariot; Scripture; the use of the OT in the NT

Abbott E.A., Johannine Grammar (London: Adam & Charles Black 1906).
Achelis H. (ed.), Hippolytus Werke. Vol. I/2: Hippolyt’s kleinere exegetische und homiletische Schriften (Die griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte; Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs 1897).
Albl M.C., “And Scripture Cannot Be Broken”. The Form and Function of the Early Christian Testimonia Collections (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 96; Leiden: Brill 1999).
Ashton J., Understanding the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993).
Ashton J., Understanding the Fourth Gospel. Second Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).
Aune D.E., Revelation 6-16 (Word Biblical Commentary 52B; Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson 1998).
Aune D.E., “Dualism in the Fourth Gospel and the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Reassessment of the Problem”, Neotestamentica et Philonica. Studies in Honor of Peder Borgen (ed. D.E. Aune – T. Seland – J.H. Ulrichsen) (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 106; Leiden: Brill 2003) 281-303.
Barrett C.K., The Gospel according to St John. An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text (London: SPCK 1978).
Bauckham R., “The Qumran Community and the Gospel of John”, The Dead Sea Scrolls Fifty Years after Their Discovery. Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20-25, 1997 (ed. M. Galen – L.H. Schiffman – E. Tov – J.C. Vanderkam) (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society 2000) 105-115.
Baumgarten J.M., “The ‘Sons of Dawn’ in CDC 13,14-15 and the Ban on Commerce among the Essenes”, Israel Exploration Journal 33 (1983) 81-85.
Beasley-Murray G.R., John. Second Edition (Word Biblical Commentary 36; Dallas, TX: Word Books 1999).
Becker J., „Aufbau, Schichtung und theologiegeschichtliche Stellung des Gebetes in Johannes 17”, Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 60 (1969) 56-83.
Bennema C., Encountering Jesus. Character Studies in the Gospel of John. Second Edition (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2014).
Bennema C., “Judas (the Betrayer): The Black Sheep of the Family”, Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel. Narrative Approach to Seventy Figures in John (ed. S.A. Hunt – D.F. Tolmie – R. Zimmermann) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2016) 360-372.
Billings J.S., “Judas Iscariot in the Fourth Gospel”, The Expository Times 51 (1939-40) 156-157.
Birdsall J.N., “John X.29”, Journal for Theological Studies 11 (1960) 342-344.
Bjerg S., “Judas als Stellvertreter des Satans”, Evangelische Theologie 52 (1992) 42-55.
Boismard M.-É. – Lamouille A., L’Évangile de Jean (Synopse des quatre Évangiles en français 3; Paris: Cerf 1987).
Borchert G.L., John 12–21 (The New American Commentary 25B; Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman Publishers 2002).
Borgen P., “The Use of Tradition in John 12:44-50”, New Testament Studies 26 (1979-1980) 18-35.
Brown R.E., “The Qumran Scrolls and the Johannine Gospel and Epistles”, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 17 (1955) 403-419.
Brown R.E., The Gospel According to John (XIII-XXI) (The Anchor Bible 29A; New York, NY: Doubleday 1970).
Brown R.E., An Introduction to the Gospel of John. Edited, Updated, Introduced, and Concluded by Francis J. Moloney (The Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library; New York, NY et al.: Doubleday 2003).
Brownson J., “Neutralising the Intimate Enemy: The Portrayal of Judas in the Fourth Gospel”, SBL 1992 Seminar Papers. One Hundred Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting, November 21-24, 1992, The San Francisco Hilton, San Francisco, California (ed. E.H. Lovering) (SBL.SPS 31; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1992) 49-60.
Bultmann R., The Gospel of John. A Commentary (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster 1971).
Burney C.F., The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Clarendon 1922).
Caba J., “Dalla parenesi lucana alla cristologia giovannea. Studio comparato di Lc 9,23-24 e Gv 12,25-26”, Luca-Atti. Studi in onore di P. Emilio Rasco nel suo 70° compleanno (ed. G. Marconi – G. O’Collins) (Assisi: Cittadella 1991) 72-104.
Carson D.A., The Gospel according to John (The Pillar New Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans – Leicester, U.K.: Apollos 1991).
Charles R.H. (ed.), The Greek Versions of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs (Oxford: Clarendon 1908).
Charles R.H. (ed.), The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs (London: Clarendon 1908).
Charlesworth J.H. – Whitaker R.E. – Hickerson L.G. – Starbuck Scott R.A. – Stuckenbruck L.T., Graphic Concordance to the Dead Sea Scrolls (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck – Louisville: Westminster John Knox 1991).
Charlesworth J.H. et al. (ed.), The Dead Sea Scrolls. Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Texts with English Translations. II. Damascus Document, War Scroll, and Related Documents (Princeton Theological Seminary Dead Sea Scrolls Project 2; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck – Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press 1995).
Charlesworth J.H., “A Critical Comparison of the Dualism in 1QS 3:13–4:26 and the “Dualism” Contained in the Gospel of John”, John and the Dead Sea Scrolls (ed. J.H. Charlesworth) (New York, NY: Crossroad 1990) 76-106.
Charlesworth J.H., “Have the Dead Sea Scrolls Revolutionized Our Understanding of the New Testament?”, The Dead Sea Scrolls Fifty Years after Their Discovery. Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20-25, 1997 (ed. M. Galen – L.H. Schiffman – E. Tov – J.C. Vanderkam) (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society 2000) 116-132.
Coloe M.L. – Thatcher T. (ed.), John, Qumran, and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Sixty Years of Discovery and Debate (Early Judaism and Its Literature 32; Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature 2011).
Comfort P.W. – Barrett D.P. (ed.), The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts. A Corrected, Enlarged Edition of the Complete Text of the Earliest New Testament Manuscripts (Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers 2001).
Congemi Trolla B., “L’assenza della tribù di Dan nell’Apocalisse canonica (7,5-8) alla luce delle tradizioni sul patriarca Dan e sui suoi discendenti”, Cristianesimi nell’antichità: fonti, istituzioni, ideologie a confronto (ed. A. D’Anna – C. Zamagni) (Spudasmata 117; Hildesheim et al.: G. Olms 2007) 39-58.
Cortès E., Los discursos de adiós de Gn 49 a Jn 13-17. Pistas para la historia de un género literario en la antigua literatura judía (Colectánea San Paciano 23; Barcelona: Herder 1976).
Daniélou J., “Le fils de perdition (Joh., 17, 12)”, Mélanges d’histoire des religions offerts à Henri-Charles Puech (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 1974) 187-189.
Davies M., Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 69; Sheffield: JSOT Press 1992).
de Jonge M., Jewish Eschatology, Early Christian Christology and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. Collected Essays (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 56; Leiden: Brill 1991).
Denker F.W., “The υἱός Phrases in the New Testament”, New Testament Studies 7 (1960-61) 94-95.
Destro A. – Pesce M., “Un confronto di sistemi. Il Vangelo di Giovanni e la Regola della communità di Qumran”, Atti del VIII Simposio de Efeso su S. Giovanni Apostolo (ed. L. Padovese) (Turchia: la Chiesa e la sua storia 15; Roma: Istituto francescano di spiritualità – Pontificio Ateneo Antoniano 2001) 81-107.
Dodd C.H., The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1953).
Evans C.A., “On the Quotation Formulas in the Fourth Gospel”, Biblische Zeitschrift 26 (1982) 79-83.
Fabris R., Giovanni. Traduzione e commento. Seconda edizione riveduta e ampliata (Commenti biblici; Roma: Borla 2003).
Freed E.D., Old Testament Quotations in the Gospel of John (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 11; Leiden: Brill 1965).
Gagné A., “Caractérisation des figures de Satan et de Judas dans le IVe Évangile: stratégie narrative et déploiement des intrigues de conflit”, Science et esprit 55 (2003) 263-284.
García Martínez F., The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated. The Qumran Texts in English (Leiden: Brill – Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 21996).
Guilding A., The Fourth Gospel and Jewish Worship. A Study of the Relation of St. John’s Gospel to the Ancient Jewish Lectionary System (London: Oxford University Press – Clarendon 1960).
Haenchen E., John 2. A Commentary on the Gospel of John. Chapters 7–21 (Hermeneia; Philadelphia, PA: Fortress 1984).
Hammer I., “Eine klare Stellung zu Joh. 14.13b”, Bibel und Kirche 14/2 (1959) 33-40.
Hanson A.T., The Prophetic Gospel. A Study of John and the Old Testament (Edinburgh: T & T Clark 1991).
Hastings J. – Selbie J.A., A Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels (Edinburgh: T & T Clark 1906).
Hill C.E., “Antichrist from the Tribe of Dan”, Journal of Theological Studies 46 (1995) 99-117.
Huby J., “Un double problème de critique textuelle et d’interprétation. Saint Jean XVII, 11-12”, Recherches de science religieuse 27 (1937) 408-421.
James M.R., The Apocryphal New Testament. A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation (Oxford: Clarendon 1924).
Keener C.S., The Gospel of John. A Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 2003).
Klassen W., Judas. Betrayer or Friend of Jesus? (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 1996).
Knapp G.Ch., H KAINH DIAQHKH. Novum Testamentum Graece. Revognavit atque insignioris lectionum varietatis et argumentorum notations subiunxit (Halle: Orphanotropheum 1787, 51840).
Kretzer A., “ἀπόλλυμι, ἀπώλεια”, The Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (ed. H. Balz – G. Schneider) (Edinburgh: T & T Clark 1990) I, 135-136.
Labahn M., “Jesus und die Autorität der Schrift im Johannesevangelium. Überlegungen zu einem spannungsreichen Verhältnis”, Israel und seine Heilstraditionen im Johannesevangelium. Festgabe für Johannes Beutler SJ zum 70. Geburtstag (ed. M. Labahn – K. Scholtissek – A. Strotmann) (Paderborn: Schöningh 2004) 185-206.
Lévi I., L’Ecclésiastique ou la Sagesse de Jésus, fils de Sira. Texte original hébreu (Bibliothèque de l’école des hautes études. Sciences religieuses 10; Paris: Leroux 1898).
Lévi I., The Hebrew Text of the Book of Ecclesiasticus (Semitic Study Series 3; Leiden: Brill 1969).
Lightfoot R.H., St. John’s Gospel. A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1956).
Lindars B., The Gospel of John (New Century Bible Commentary; London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott 1972).
Lindars B., “Traditions behind the Fourth Gospel”, L’Évangile de Jean. Sources, rédaction, théologie (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 44; Gembloux: Duculot – Leuven: Leuven University Press 1987) 107-124.
Lorein G.W., The Antichrist Theme in the Intertestamental Period (Library of Second Temple Studies – Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Supplement Series 44; London: Sheffield Academic Press 2003).
Martín Nieto E., “El nombre de Dios en S. Jh., 17, 11-12”, Estudios Biblicos 11 (1952) 5-30.
Menken M.J.J., Old Testament Quotations in the Fourth Gospel. Studies in Textual Form (Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 15; Kampen: Pharos 1996).
Merx A., Das Evangelium des Johannes nach der Syrischen im Sinaikloster gefundenen Palimsesthandschrift (Berlin: Reimer 1911).
Michaels J.R., John (Understanding the Bible; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1989).
Michaels J.R., “Betrayal and the Betrayer: The Uses of Scripture in John 13.18-19”, The Gospels and the Scriptures of Israel (ed. C.A. Evans – W.R. Stegner) (Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Supplement Series 104 – Studies in Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity 3; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1994) 459-474.
Michaels J.R., The Gospel of John (The New International Commentary on the New Testament; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010).
Moloney F.J., Glory not Dishonor: Reading John 13–21 (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 1998).
Moloney F.J., The Gospel of John (Sacra Pagina 4; Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press 1998).
Moloney F.J., “The Gospel of John as Scripture”, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 67 (2005) 454-468.
Moloney F.J., The Gospel of John. Text and Context (Biblical Interpretation Series 72; Boston – Leiden: Brill 2005).
Moloney F.J., “What Came First – Scripture or Canon? The Gospel of John as a Test Case”, Salesianum 68 (2006) 7-20.
Moloney F.J., “The Gospel of John: The “End” of Scripture”, Interpretation 64 (2009) 356-366.
Moloney F.J., “«For as yet they did not know the Scripture» (John 20,9). A Study in Narrative Time”, Irish Theological Quarterly 79/2 (2014) 97-111.
Moloney F.J., Johannine Studies 1975-2017 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 372; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2017).
Moody Smith D., “When Did the Gospels Become Scripture?”, Journal of Biblical Literature 119 (2000) 3-20.
Morgen M., “«Perdre sa vie». Jn 12,25: un dit traditionnel?”, Revue des sciences religieuses 69/1 (1995) 29-46.
Morris L., The Gospel according to John. Revised Edition (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1995).
Murphy R.M., “Šahat in the Qumran Literature”, Biblica 39 (1958) 61-66.
Murray L., “The Church Fathers and the Fall of Judas. Grace, Predestination and Free Will among Early Modern Catholic Biblical Commentaries”, Augustiniana 65/3-4 (2015) 185-203.
Neirynck F., “Saving/Losing One’s Life. Luke 17,33 (Q?) and Mark 8,35”, Evangelica III. 1992-2000. Collected Essays (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 150; Leuven: Leuven University Press 2001) 480-503.
North W.E.S., “«The Scripture» in John 17.12”, A Journey Round John. Tradition, Interpretation and Context in the Fourth Gospel (Library of the New Testament Studies 534; London et al.: Bloomsbury 2015) 45-56.
North W.E.S., “Judas Iscariot and Satan in the Fourth Gospel”, A Journey Round John. Tradition, Interpretation and Context in the Fourth Gospel (Library of the New Testament Studies 534; London et al.: Bloomsbury 2015) 21-24.
Obermann A., Die christologische Erfüllung der Schrift im Johannesevangelium: Eine Untersuchung zur johanneischen Hermeneutik anhand der Schriftzitate (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/83; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1996).
Pokorny P., “Lukas 17,33parr. - Die Geschichte Jesu und ein (damals) bekanntes Sprichwort”, For the Children, Perfect Instruction. Studies in Honor of Hans-Martin Schenke on the Occasion of the Berliner Arbeitskreis für koptisch-gnostische Schriften’s Thirtieth Year (ed. H.-G. Bethge – S. Emmel – K.L. King) (Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 54; Leiden: Brill 2002) 387-398.
Popkes W., “δίδωμι”, Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (ed. H. Balz – G. Schneider) (Edinburgh: T & T Clark 1990) I, 320-322.
Quast K., Reading the Gospel of John. An Introduction (New York, NY: Paulist 1991).
Rabin C., The Zadokite Documents (London: Clarendon 1954).
Rebell W., “«Sein Leben verlieren» (Mark 8,35 parr.) als Strukturmoment vor- und nachösterlichen Glaubens”, New Testament Studies 35 (1989) 202-218.
Reim R., Studien zum alttestamentlichen Hintergrund des Johannesevangeliums (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 22; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1974).
Sanders J.N. – Mastin B.A., A Commentary on the Gospel according to St John (London: Adam & Charles Black 1968).
Schnackenburg R., The Gospel According to St John, Volume Three. Commentary on Chapters 12–21 (Herder’s Theological Commentary on the New Testament; New York, NY: Crossroad 1990).
Schuchard B., Scripture within Scripture. The Interrelationship of Form and Function in the Explicit Old Testament Citations in the Gospel of John (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 133; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1992).
Smend R., Die Weisheit des Jesus Sirach (Berlin: Reimer 1906).
Smith C.R., “The Portrayal of the Church as the New Israel in the Names and Order of the Tribes in Revelation 7.5-8”, Journal for the Study of the New Testament 39 (1990) 111-118.
Sproston W.E., “Satan in the Fourth Gospel”, Studia Biblica 1978. II. Papers on the Gospels. Sixth International Congress on Biblical Studies, Oxford 3-7 April 1978 (ed. E.A. Livingstone) (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 2) (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1980) 307-311.
Sproston W.E., “«The Scripture» in John 17:12”, Scripture: Meaning and Method. Essays Presented to Anthony Tyrrell Hanson for His Seventieth Birthday (ed. B.P. Thompson) (Hull: University of Hull 1987) 24-36.
Tenney M.C., “John”, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. IX. John and Acts (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1981) 1-203.
Thompson M.M., John. A Commentary (The New Testament Library; Louisville: Westminster John Knox 2015).
Van Belle G., „L’accomplissement de la parole de Jésus. La parenthèse de Jn 18,9”, The Scriptures in the Gospels (ed. C.M. Tuckett) (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 131; Leuven: Leuven University Press 1997) 617-627.
Vanderkam J.C., The Book of Jubilees (Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium; 511 / Scriptores Aethiopici; 88; Lovanii: Peeters 1989).
von Wahlde U.C., “Judas, the Son of Perdition, and the Fulfillment of Scripture in John 17:12”, The New Testament and Early Christian Literature in Greco-Roman Context. Studies in Honor of David E. Aune (ed. J. Fotopoulos) (Supplement to Novum Testamentum 122; Leiden: Brill 2006) 167-181.
von Wahlde U.C., The Gospel and Letters of John. II. Commentary on the Gospel of John (Eerdmans Critical Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010).
von Wahlde U.C., The Gospel and Letters of John. III. Commentary on the Three Johannine Letters (Eerdmans Critical Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010).
Westcott B.F., The Gospel according to St John. The Authorized Version with Introduction and Notes (London: John Murray 1892).
Wilcox M., “The Composition of John 13:21-30”, Neotestamentica et semitica. Studies in Honour of Matthew Black (ed. E.E. Earle – M. Wilcox – M. Black) (Edinburg: T & T Clark 1969) 143-156.
Wright W.M., “Greco-Roman Character Typing and the Presentation of Judas in the Fourth Gospel”, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 71 (2009) 544-559.

Opublikowane : 2019-01-18


Kubiś, A. (2019). Judas or Jesus’ Other Disciples? The Old Testament or Jesus’ Word? A Mysterious Reference to the “Scripture” in John 17:12. The Biblical Annals, 9(1), 131-176. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.284

Adam Kubiś  akubis@gmail.com
Instytut Nauk Biblijnych KUL 
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4961-2254




Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

1. Zgodnie z ustawą o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych z dnia 4 lutego 1994r., autor publikacji przekazuje autorskie prawa majątkowe dotyczące składanego dzieła wydawcy czasopisma the Biblical Annals. Przeniesienie praw autorskich do składanego dzieła następuje na wszystkich polach eksploatacji, w szczególności tych wymienionych w art. 50 ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych:

  • W zakresie utrwalania i zwielokrotniania utworu – wytwarzanie określoną techniką egzemplarzy dzieła, w tym techniką drukarską, reprograficzną, zapisu magnetycznego oraz techniką cyfrową.
  • W zakresie obrotu oryginałem albo egzemplarzami , na których dzieło utrwalono – wprowadzanie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału albo egzemplarzy.
  • W zakresie rozpowszechniania utworu w sposób inny niż określony w pkt. 2 – publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie utworu, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i czasie przez siebie wybranym.

2. Za zgodą redakcji czasopisma opublikowane artykuły w Biblical Annals mogą być przedrukowywane w innych publikacjach.

3. Redakcja publikuje teksty on line na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 - Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).