Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
Levente Balazs Martos
Pázmány Péter Catholic University , Hungaryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-0352
Abstract
The 2019 PBC document views relationships between parents and children, masters and servants, “shepherds” and “the flock,” civil authority and citizens as asymmetric. The structure of the document suggests that these relationship systems are based on shared human experience and a common theological foundation: they appear to repeat the pattern of the parent-child relationship and originate in the obligation to obey God. Using the document as a starting point, I would like to outline what the concept of asymmetric relationships can mean today. In search of common perspectives, I will compare New Testament texts with the interpretation of asymmetry in today’s social ethics discourse. The inequality and asymmetry of different persons and groups seem to be an undeniable fact, causing tension that can be resolved fruitfully by parties who take responsibility for each other in the presence of a “third.”
Keywords:
vulnerability, asymmetric relationships, reciprocity, obedienceReferences
Bedorf, T., Dimensionen des Dritten. Sozialphilosophische Modelle zwischen Ethischem und Politischem (Phänomenologische Untersuchungen 16; München: Fink 2003).
Bennent-Vahle, H., Mit Gefühl denken. Einblicke in die Philosophie der Emotionen (Freiburg – München: Alber 2013).
Bracci, M., “Nell’obbedienza di Gesù, Figlio di Dio e nostro fratello,” Synaxis 37/2 (2019) 11–24.
Ciampa, R.E., “Ideological Challenges for Bible Translators,” International Journal of Frontier Missiology 28/3 (2011) 139–148.
Cipolletta, S. – Frassoni, E. – Faccio, E., “Construing a Therapeutic Relationship Online: An Analysis of Videoconference Sessions,” Clinical Psychologist 22/1 (2018) 220–229. (Crossref)
Czapski, J., “Ausbruch aus dem Sein. Verwundbarkeit als rätselhafter Sinn der Menschlichkeit im Denken von Emmanuel Levinas,” Verletzbarkeit des Humanen. Sexualisierte Gewalt an Minderjährigen im interdisziplinären Diskurs (ed. T. Bahne) (Regensburg: Pustet 2021) 44–56.
Francis, “Address of His Holiness Pope Francis,” https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2019/june/documents/papa-francesco_20190621_teologia-napoli.html [access: 29.12.2021].
Freistetter, W. – Wagnsonner, C., “Asymmetrie im Spiegel der Weltreligionen,” Aspekte der Asymmetrie – Reflexionen über ein gesellschafts- und sicherheitspolitisches Phänomen (eds. J. Schröfl – T. Pankratz – E. Micewski) (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2006) 173–179.
Gzella, H., “Parallelismus und Asymmetrie in ugaritischen Texten,” Parallelismus membrorum (ed. A. Wagner) (Orbis biblicus et orientalis 224; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht – Fribourg: Presses Universitaires 2007) 133–146.
Herrmann, S., Symbolische Verletzbarkeit. Die doppelte Asymmetrie des Sozialen nach Hegel und Levinas (Sozialphilosophische Studien 7; Bielefeld: transcript Verlag 2013). (Crossref)
Jost, J.T., “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology,” Political Psychology 38/2 (2017) 167–208. (Crossref)
Laumer, A., “Beschleunigung und Resonanz. Pastoraltheologische Perspektiven zu Hartmut Rosas Sozialtheorie,”Theologie und Glaube 111/1 (2021) 1–15.
Macioce, F., “Toleration as Asymmetric Recognition,” Persona y derecho 77/2 (2017) 227–250. (Crossref)
MacGillivray, E.D., “Re-Evaluating Patronage and Reciprocity in Antiquity and New Testament Studies,” Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 6 (2009) 37–81.
Malan, F.S., “Unity of Love in the Body of Christ: Identity, Ethics and Ethos in Ephesians,” Identity, Ethics and Ethos in the New Testament (ed. J.G. van der Watt) (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche
Wissenschaft 141; Berlin – New York: De Gruyter 2006) 257–287.
Pontificia Commissione Biblica, «Che cosa è l’uomo?» (Sal 8,5). Un itinerario di antropologia biblica, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/pcb_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20190930_cosa-e-luomo_it.html [access: 29.12.2021]. English trans. F. O’Fearghail – A. Graffy: The Pontifical Biblical
Commission, What Is Man? A Journey Through Biblical Anthropology (London: Darton, Longman & Todd 2021) (= IAB).
Pontificia Commissione Biblica, Ispirazione e verità della Sacra Scrittura. La Parola che viene da Dio e parla di Dio per salvare il mondo, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/pcb_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20140222_ispirazione-verita-sacra-scrittura_it.html [access: 29.12.2021].
Reydams-Schils, G.J., “Clement of Alexandria on Woman and Marriage in the Light of the New Testament Household Codes,” Greco-Roman Culture and the New Testament. Studies Commemorating the Centennial of the Pontifical Biblical Institute (eds. D.E. Aune – F.E. Brenk) (Novum Testamentum Supplements 143; Leiden: Brill 2012) 113–133. (Crossref)
Riedl, A.M., Ethik an den Grenzen der Souveränität: Christliche Sozialethik im Dialog mit Judith Butler unter
Berücksichtigung des Kindeswohlbegriffs (Paderborn: Schöningh 2017).
Rosa, H., “Resonanz als Schlüsselbegriff der Sozialtheorie,” Resonanz. Im interdisziplinären Gespräch mit Hartmut Rosa (ed. J.-P. Wils) (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2019) 9–30. (Crossref)
Saake, I., “Die Dominanz des Arztes. Warum medizinische Asymmetrien unvermeidbar sind,” Ärztliche Tätigkeit im 21. Jahrhundert – Profession oder Dienstleistung (eds. S. Klinke – M. Kadmon) (Berlin: Springer 2018) 311–329. (Crossref)
Schöning, B., Geschwisterlichkeit lernen. Eine neue theologische Einschätzung der Aufstiegserzählung Davids (Beiträge
zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 223; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 2019).
Shchyttsova, T., “Intergenerative Asymmetrie und Gabe. Zur Heuristik und Poetik des Verhältnisses zwischen
Erwachsenen und Kindern,” Kontexte des Leiblichen (eds. C. Nielsen – K. Novotný – T. Nenon) (Nordhausen: Bautz 2016) 219–232.
Standhartinger, A., “Die ‘Haustafel’ im Kolosserbrief,” Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte und Intention des Kolosserbriefs (ed. A. Standhartinger) (Novum Testamentum Supplements 94; Leiden: Brill 1999) 247–276. (Crossref)
Stubenrauch, B., Theologie studieren (Uni-Taschenbücher 4932; Paderborn: Schöningh 2019). (Crossref)
Tatranský, T., “A Reciprocal Asymmetry? Levinas’s Ethics Reconsidered,” Ethical Perspectives 15/3 (2008) 293–307. (Crossref)
Taube, K.-M., “Patient-Doctor Relationship in Dermatology. From Compliance to Concordance,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica 96/Suppl. 217 (2016) 25–29.
Tomcsányi, T. – Fodor, L., “Segítő kapcsolat, segítő szindróma, segítő identitás,” Egymás közt – egymásért (eds. I. Jelenits – T. Tomcsányi) (Budapest: HÍD Családsegítő Központ – Szeged: Szeged-Csanádi Püspökség 1990) 19–45.
Welborn, L.L., “‘That There May Be Equality’: The Contexts and Consequences of a Pauline Ideal,” New Testament Studies 59/1 (2013) 73–90. (Crossref)
Wirth, M., Distanz des Gehorsams. Theorie, Ethik und Kritik einer Tugend (Religion in Philosophy and Theology 87; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2016). (Crossref)
Witherington, B. – Wessels, G.F., “Do Everything in the Name of the Lord: Ethics and Ethos in Colossians,”Identity, Ethics and Ethos in the New Testament (ed. J.G. van der Watt) (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 141; Berlin – New York: De Gruyter 2006) 303–333.
Pázmány Péter Catholic University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-0352
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher. - The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
- The Publisher may sublicense the work.
- Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).
