Ruling the rûaḥ: Emotional Experience and Expression in Ancient Hebrew

Joel Atwood

Talua Theological Training Institute , Vanuatu

Abstrakt

Emotions are one of the most fascinating and difficult aspects of human experience, and have received significant attention in biblical studies. This paper explores how one Hebrew lexeme, rûaḥ, provides a point of entry into the complex world of how emotions are expressed in ancient texts. Drawing from some insights of Cognitive Linguistics, it examines the use of rûaḥ to express the experience of impatience and patience, and arrogance and humility. This paper then challenges a long-held but simplistic equation of rûaḥ with anger, and argues that a more nuanced and complex relationship exists between lexeme and emotion than most citations in scholarship suggest.

Słowa kluczowe:

emotions, ruah, breath, anger, patience, arrogance, semantics, metaphor, cognitive-linguistics

Andersen, F.I., Job. An Introduction and Commentary (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 14; Nottingham: Inter-Varsity Press 1976).

Bartholomew, C.G., Ecclesiastes (Baker Commentary on the Old Testament Wisdom and Psalms; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic 2009).

Bergman, J. – Von Soden, W. – Ackroyd, P. R., “ יָד ,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (eds. G.J. Botterweck – H.-J. Fabry – H. Ringgren) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1986) V, 393–427.

Boling, R.G., Judges. Introduction, Translation, and Commentary (Anchor Bible 6; New York: Doubleday 1975).

Briggs, C.A., “The Use of רוח in the Old Testament,” Journal of Biblical Literature 19 (1900) 132–145.

Butler, T.C., Judges (Word Biblical Commentary 8; Nashville, TN: Nelson 2009).

Childs, B.S., Isaiah. A Commentary (Old Testament Library; Louisville, KY: Westminister John Knox 2001).

Clifford, R.J., Proverbs. A Commentary (Old Testament Library; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 1999).

Clines, D.J.A., Job 1–20 (Word Biblical Commentary 17; Dallas, TX: Word Books 2006).

Clines, D.J.A. (ed.), The Concise Dictionary of Classical Hebrew (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press 2009) (= CDCH).

Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon, https://cal.huc.edu/ (access: 29.03.2022) (= CAL).

Crenshaw, J.L., Ecclesiastes. A Commentary (Old Testament Library; Philadelphia, PA: Westminster 1987).

Croft, W. – Cruse, D.A., Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004).

Dhorme, É., L’emploi métaphorique des noms de parties du corps. En Hébreu et en Akkadien (Paris: Libraire Victor Lecoffre 1923).

Dhorme, É., Le Livre de Job, 2 ed. (EBib; Paris: Libraire Victor Lecoffre 1926).

Dietch, L.A., Authority and Violence in the Gideon and Abimelech Narratives. A Sociological and Literary Exploration of Judges 6–9 (Hebrew Bible Monographs 75; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix 2015).

Ehrlich, A.B., Randglossen Zur Hebräischen Bibel. Textkritisches, Sprachliches Und Sachliches (Hildesheim: Olms 1968) VI.

Evans, V., Cognitive Linguistics. A Complete Guide, 2 ed. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2019).

Evans, V. – Green, M., Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University 2006).

Fabry, H.-J. – Tengström, S., “ רוּחַ ,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (eds. G.J. Botterweck – H.-J. Fabry – H. Ringgren) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2004) XIII, 365–402.

Fillmore, C.J. – Baker, C., “A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis,” The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (eds. B. Heine – H. Narrog) (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 313–339.

Fox, M.V., Proverbs 10–31. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Anchor Bible 18B; New York: Doubleday 2009).

Gutt, E.-A., Relevance Theory. A Guide to Successful Communication in Translation (New York: SIL 1992).

Gutt, E.-A., Translation and Relevance. Cognition and Context, 2 ed. (Manchester: St Jerome 2000).

Haak, R.D., “A Study and New Interpretation of qṣr npš,” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982) 161–167.

Hentschke, R., “ גבַָּהּ ,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (eds. G.J. Botterweck – H.-J. Fabry – H. Ringgren) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1978) II, 356–361.

Jaques, M., “The Discourse of Emotion in Ancient Mesopotamia: A Theoretical Approach,” Visualizing Emotions in the Ancient Near East (ed. S. Kipfer) (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 285; Fribourg: Academic Press 2017) 185–205.

Johnson, A.R., The Vitality of the Individual in the Thought of Ancient Israel, 2 ed. (Cardiff: University of Wales 1964).

King, P.D., Surrounded by Bitterness. Image Schemas and Metaphors for Conceptualizing Distress in Classical Hebrew (Eugene, OR: Pickwick 2012).

Köhlmoos, M., Kohelet. Der Prediger Salomo (Das Alte Testament Deutsch 16/5; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015).

Kotzé, Z., The Conceptualisation of Anger in the Hebrew Bible (Diss. Stellenbosch University; Stellenbosch 2004).

Kotzé, Z., “A Cognitive Linguistic Methodology for the Study of Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible,” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 31 (2005) 107–117.

Kotzé, Z., “Humoral Theory as Motivation for Anger Metaphors in the Hebrew Bible,” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 23 (2005) 205–209.

Kövecses, Z., Emotion Concepts (New York: Springer 1990).

Kövecses, Z., Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love. A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts (Pragmatics & Beyond 8; Amsterdam: Benjamins 1986).

Kövecses, Z., “The Concept of Anger: Universal or Culture Specific?,” Psychopathology 33/4 (2000) 159–170.

Kruger, P.A., “A Cognitive Interpretation of the Emotion of Anger in the Hebrew Bible,” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 26 (2000) 181–193.

Kruger, P.A., “Emotions in the Hebrew Bible: A Few Observations on Prospects and Challenges,” Old Testament Essays 28/2 (2015) 395–420.

Lakoff, G. – Kövecses, Z., “The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in American English,” Cultural Models in Language and Thought (eds. D. Holland – N. Quinn) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987) 195–221.

Langacker, R.W., Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).

Lauha, R., Psychophysischer Sprachgebrauch im Alten Testament. Eine Strukturalsemantische Analyse von ,לב ,נפשׁ und רוח (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Dissertationes humanarum litterarum 35; Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia 1983).

Levison, J.R., Filled with the Spirit (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2009).

Longman, T., The Book of Ecclesiastes (New International Commentary on the Old Testament; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1998).

Lys, D., Rûach. Le souffle dans l’Ancien Testament. Enquête anthropologique à travers l’histoire théologique d’Israël (Études d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 56; Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1962).

McAffee, M., Life and Mortality in Ugaritic. A Lexical and Literary Study (Explorations in Ancient Near Eastern Civilizations 7; University Park: Eisenbrauns 2019).

Mirguet, F., “What Is an ‘Emotion’ in the Hebrew Bible?: An Experience That Exceeds Most Contemporary Concepts,” Biblical Interpretation 24 (2016) 442–465.

Müller, K., Lobe den Herrn, meine “Seele”. Eine kognitiv-linguistische Studie zur næfæš des Menschen im Alten Testament (Beiträge zur Wissenschaft vom Alten und Neuen Testament 215; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 2018).

Murphy, R.E., Ecclesiastes (Word Biblical Commentary 23A; Grand Rapids, MI: Word Books 1992).

Nelson, R.D., Judges. A Critical and Rhetorical Commentary (London: Bloomsbury – Clark 2017).

Newsom, C.A., The Spirit within Me. Self and Agency in Ancient Israel and Second Temple Judaism (Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 2021).

Ostermann, C., Cognitive Lexicography. A New Approach to Lexicography Making Use of Cognitive Semantics (Lexicographica. Series Maior 149; Berlin: De Gruyter 2015).

Oswalt, J.N., Isaiah 1–39 (New International Commentary on the Old Testament 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1986).

Puech, É., Qumrân Grotte 4-XXVII. Textes araméens, deuxième partie. 4Q550–4Q575a, 4Q580–4Q587 et appendices (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 37; Oxford: Clarendon 2009).

Roberts, J.J.M., First Isaiah. A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2015).

Ryken, L. et al. (eds.), Dictionary of Biblical Imagery (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press 1998).

Schlimm, M.R., “Emotion, Embodiment, and Ethics: Engaging Anger in Genesis,” Bodies, Embodiment, and Theology of the Hebrew Bible (eds. S. Tamar Kamionkowski – W. Kim) (The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 465; New York: Clark 2010) 146–158.

Schlimm, M.R., From Fratricide to Forgiveness. The Language and Ethics of Anger in Genesis (Siphrut 7; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 2011).

Schoemaker, W.R., “The Use of רוּחַ in the Old Testament, and of Πνευμα in the New Testament: A Lexicographical Study,” Journal of Biblical Literature 23 (1904) 13–67.

Seow, C.L., Ecclesiastes (Anchor Bible 18C; New York: Doubleday 1997).

Smith, M.S. – Bloch-Smith, E., Judges 1. A Commentary on Judges 1:1–10:5 (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2021).

Swanson, D.M., “East Wind,” Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible (ed. D.N. Freedman) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2000) 362.

Tilford, N.L., Sensing World, Sensing Wisdom. The Cognitive Foundation of Biblical Metaphors (Ancient Israel and Its Literature 31; Atlanta, GA: SBL Press 2017).

Van der Merwe, C.H.J., “Biblical Hebrew and Cognitive Linguistics: A General Orientation,” New Perspectives in Biblical and Rabbinic Hebrew (eds. A.D. Hornkohl – G. Khan) (Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures 7; Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Open Book 2021) 641–696.

Van Pelt, M.V. – Kaiser, Jr., W.C. – Block, D.I., “ רוּחַ ,” New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis (ed. W.A. VanGemeren) (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 1997) III, 1070–1075.

Van Wolde, E.J., Reframing Biblical Studies. When Language and Text Meet Culture, Cognition, and Context (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 2009).

Watts, J.D.W., Isaiah 1–33, Rev. ed. (Word Biblical Commentary 24; Nashville, TN: Nelson 2005).

Webb, B.G., The Book of Judges (New International Commentary on the Old Testament; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2012).

Weeks, S., Ecclesiastes 5–12. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary (International Critical Commentary; London: Bloomsbury – Clark 2021).

Westermann, C. – Albertz, R., “ רוּחַ ,” Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament (eds. E. Jenni – C. Westermann) (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 1997) III, 1202–1219.

Wilson, G.H., Job (Understanding the Bible Commentary Series; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic 2012).

Wilson, L., Job (Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2015).

Wright, J., “Rûaḥ: A Survey,” The Concept of Spirit. Papers from The Concept of Spirit Conference Held at St. Paul’s

College, University of Sydney, 21–24 May 1984 (eds. D.W. Dockrill – R.G. Tanner) (Prudentia; Auckland: University of Auckland 1985) 5–26.

Zisa, G., “Going, Returning, Rising: The Movement of the Organs in the Mesopotamian Anatomy,” Kaskal 16 (2019) 453–476.


Opublikowane
2022-07-15


Atwood, J. (2022). Ruling the rûaḥ: Emotional Experience and Expression in Ancient Hebrew. The Biblical Annals, 12(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.13554

Joel Atwood  joel.a.atwood@gmail.com
Talua Theological Training Institute https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8034-1053



Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

1. Zgodnie z ustawą o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych z dnia 4 lutego 1994r., autor publikacji przekazuje autorskie prawa majątkowe dotyczące składanego dzieła wydawcy czasopisma the Biblical Annals. Przeniesienie praw autorskich do składanego dzieła następuje na wszystkich polach eksploatacji, w szczególności tych wymienionych w art. 50 ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych:

  • W zakresie utrwalania i zwielokrotniania utworu – wytwarzanie określoną techniką egzemplarzy dzieła, w tym techniką drukarską, reprograficzną, zapisu magnetycznego oraz techniką cyfrową.
  • W zakresie obrotu oryginałem albo egzemplarzami , na których dzieło utrwalono – wprowadzanie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału albo egzemplarzy.
  • W zakresie rozpowszechniania utworu w sposób inny niż określony w pkt. 2 – publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie utworu, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i czasie przez siebie wybranym.

2. Za zgodą redakcji czasopisma opublikowane artykuły w Biblical Annals mogą być przedrukowywane w innych publikacjach.

3. Redakcja publikuje teksty on line na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 - Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).