“Ephraim is a Cake Not turned”: the Fruits of the False Knowledge of God According to Hos 7:8-16

Ibolya Balla

Pápa Reformed Theological Seminary , Węgry

Abstrakt

The document of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, called What is man? A Journey through Biblical Anthropology points out in Chapter 1 (“The Human being created by God”), par. 33 that “[t]he failure to recognise the ‘created’ nature of the human being is made explicit in history as an arrogant presumption…” (46) and in par. 34 that “[a]n extraordinary endowment of intelligence, wealth and power gives the human being the illusion of being equal to God. To expose this deception of conscience the Lord predicts the inglorious end of the arrogant” (47). Many of the critiques and prophecies of Hosea are proclaimed in a period of Israelite history which reflects false and arrogant presumptions of the people of God. During the reign of Jeroboam II (ca. 784–753 BC) Israel experienced economic growth, territorial expansion and peace with the Arameans and the Judeans. However, especially following the Syro-Ephraimite war (734–732 BC) it became clear that Israel’s political and military manoeuvres and his trust in his own strength can only lead to disaster. This is one of the recurring messages of Hosea who points out that the only way to stand is to believe and trust in God alone. Many of his images and concepts describe Israel’s false beliefs and presumptions which are based on the erroneous knowledge of God. Hos 7:8-16 can be read as an essence of this message. Its literary devices and notions emphasize that while Israel appears to be potent, he is in fact impotent, the undiscerning nation’s “strength” is withering away. Israel seems wise and knowledgeable when he is in fact unwise and does not know the way of life. In the context of the entire book this passage affirms that the basis of the relation of God and Israel is always the right knowledge of him which entails the right knowledge of the self and of its place in the universe. One of God’s greatest mercies for creation and Israel is that he is available, he can be sought, found and known through his words and deeds. Hosea as the mediator of God conveys to Israel that they can call upon God, seek him and know him. While his message is for a special historical period and circumstances, it is relevant for all ages when humans ignore their created nature and aspire to be powerful, self-sufficient, intelligent in economic, scientific, political and military matters.

Słowa kluczowe:

Book of Hosea, Knowledge of God, Israel’s folly, Literary devices

Andersen, F.I. – Freedman, D.N., Hosea. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Anchor Bible 24; Garden City, NY: Doubleday 1980). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780300261387

Ben Zvi, E., Hosea (Forms of the Old Testament Literature 21A/1; Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge: Eerdmans 2005).

Czanik, P., Hóseás könyvének magyarázata (Budapest – Gödöllő: Iránytű Kiadó 1996).

Dearman, J.A., The Book of Hosea (New International Commentary on the Old Testament; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2010).

Eidevall, G., Grapes in the Desert. Metaphors, Models, and Themes in Hosea 4–14 (Connaître la Bible Old Testament 43; Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1996).

Elliger, K. – Rudolph, W. (eds.), Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, 5 ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft 1990).

Emmerson, G.I., Hosea. An Israelite Prophet in Judean Perspective (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 28; Sheffield: JSOT Press 1984).

Haddox, S.E., “(E)Masculinity in Hosea’s Political Rhetoric,” Israel’s Prophets and Israel’s Past. Essays on the Relationship of Prophetic Texts and Israelite History in Honor of John H. Hayes (eds. B.E. Kelle – M.B. Moore) (Old Testament Studies 446; New York: Clark 2006) 174–200.

Haddox, S.E., Metaphor and Masculinity in Hosea (Studies in Biblical Literature 141; New York: Lang 2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0800-6

Hong, S.-H., The Metaphor of Illness and Healing in Hosea and Its Significance in the Socio-Economic Context of Eighth-Century Israel and Judah (Studies in Biblical Literature 95; New York: Lang 2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0647-7

Jagersma, H., Izráel története az ószövetségi korban (Budapest: Református Zsinati Iroda Sajtóosztálya 1991).

Kaufmann, Y., The Religion of Israel From its Beginnings to the Babylonian Exile (London: Allen & Unwin 1960).

Keel, O., The Symbolism of the Biblical World. Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 1997).

Kelle, B.E., Hosea 2. Metaphor and Rhetoric in Historical Perspective (Society of Biblical Literature Academia

Biblica 20; Atlanta, GA: SBL 2005).

Kruger, P.A., “Yahweh‘s Generous Love. Eschatological Expectations in Hosea 14:2–9,” Old Testament Essays 1 (1983) 27–48.

Kruger, P.A., “Prophetic Imagery. On Metaphors and Similes in the Book of Hosea,” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 14 (1988) 143–151.

Kruger, P.A., “The Divine Net in Hos 7:12,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 68 (1992) 132–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.68.1.542166

Lancaster, M.D., Like a Lion and the Morning Dawn. Reconceiving Yahweh Through the Metaphors of Hosea 4–14 (PhD Diss. Wheaton College; Wheaton, IL 2020).

Landy, F., Hosea, 2 ed. (Readings. A New Biblical Commentary; Sheffield: Phoenix Press 2011).

Middlemas, J., “Divine Presence in Absence,” Divine Presence and Absence in Exilic and Post-Exilic Judaism. Studies of the Sofja Kovalevskaja Research Group on Early Jewish Monotheism (eds. N. MacDonald – I.J. de Hulster) (Forschungen zum Alten Testament 61/2; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2013) II, 183–211.

Miller, J.M. – Hayes, J.H., A History of Ancient Israel and Judah (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 1986).

Morris, G., Prophecy, Poetry and Hosea (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 219; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1996).

Nogalski, J., Literary Precursors to the Book of the Twelve (Berlin: De Gruyter 1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864304

Nwaoru, E., “The Role of Images in the Literary Structure of Hosea VII 8–VIII 14,” Vetus Testamentum 54/2 (2004) 216–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853304323018909

Oestreich, B., Metaphors and Similes for Yahweh in Hosea 14:2–9 (1–8). A Study of Hoseanic Pictorial Language (Frankfurt am Main: Lang 1998).

Paul, S.M., “The Image of the Oven and the Cake in Hosea VII 4–10,” Vetus Testamentum 18/1 (1968) 114–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1516604

Ramirez, F.F. Ll., “A Love Like a Morning Mist. Hosea 5:15–6:6,” Landas 27/2 (2013) 101–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/LA2013.27207

Seow, C.L., “Hosea 14:10 and the Foolish People Motif,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 44/2 (1982) 212–224.

Sheppard, G.T., Wisdom as a Hermeneutical Construct. A Study in the Sapientializing of the Old Testament (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 151; Berlin: De Gruyter 1980). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110837087

Simkins, R.A., Creator and Creation. Nature in the Worldview of Ancient Israel, https://www.academia.edu/1531038/Creator_and_Creation_Nature_in_the_Worldview_of_Ancient_Israel [access: 7.06.2022].

Stuart, D., Hosea–Jonah (Word Biblical Commentary 31; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 1988).

Sweeney, M.A., The Twelve Prophets. I. Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah (Berit Olam. Studies in Hebrew Narrative and Poetry; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press 2000).

Tóth, K., Hóseás próféta könyve 1–7. részének magyarázata (Budapest: Református Theologiai Akadémia 1978).

Wolff, H.W., Hosea. A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Hosea (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press 1974).

Yee, G.A., Composition and Tradition in the Book of Hosea. A Redaction Critical Investigation (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 102; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1987).


Opublikowane
2022-07-15


Balla, I. (2022). “Ephraim is a Cake Not turned”: the Fruits of the False Knowledge of God According to Hos 7:8-16. The Biblical Annals, 12(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.13564

Ibolya Balla  karib34@hotmail.com
Pápa Reformed Theological Seminary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-725X



Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

1. Zgodnie z ustawą o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych z dnia 4 lutego 1994r., autor publikacji przekazuje autorskie prawa majątkowe dotyczące składanego dzieła wydawcy czasopisma the Biblical Annals. Przeniesienie praw autorskich do składanego dzieła następuje na wszystkich polach eksploatacji, w szczególności tych wymienionych w art. 50 ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych:

  • W zakresie utrwalania i zwielokrotniania utworu – wytwarzanie określoną techniką egzemplarzy dzieła, w tym techniką drukarską, reprograficzną, zapisu magnetycznego oraz techniką cyfrową.
  • W zakresie obrotu oryginałem albo egzemplarzami , na których dzieło utrwalono – wprowadzanie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału albo egzemplarzy.
  • W zakresie rozpowszechniania utworu w sposób inny niż określony w pkt. 2 – publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie utworu, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i czasie przez siebie wybranym.

2. Za zgodą redakcji czasopisma opublikowane artykuły w Biblical Annals mogą być przedrukowywane w innych publikacjach.

3. Redakcja publikuje teksty on line na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 - Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).